Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

Enter Keyword:

-Search tips
Onstream Media Powered Video
Teacher Resources

Salmon vs. Dams:
The Dam Removal Debate on the Elwha River

Download a printable version (PDF)

Overview
Grade Level: 10-12
Background Information:

Hydroelectric Power has long been touted as a clean alternative source of energy. It produces roughly 70% of the power in the Pacific Northwest. However, hydroelectric is not without its costs. Salmon runs on the major river systems, such as the Columbia River, and on minor rivers, such as the Elwha River in Olympic National Park, have suffered greatly in recent decades, and some of these salmon species are becoming listed as endangered or threatened species. Today, large dams on the Columbia River, owned by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) provide the majority of power for the Pacific Northwest. Yet hundreds of small, privately owned dams are scattered around the region. These are in various states of disrepair, and often only provide enough power to fuel a small community or one or two factories. However, these dams do as much or more damage to the salmon runs in their area than the large dams (BPA dams have extensive programs to help the fish successfully navigate the dams). This lesson is derived from real testimony given to Congress regarding two of these small dams in the pristine Olympic National Park in Washington. In this lesson, students will use roll playing to discuss the merits of tearing down these dams so that the Elwha River can run free. Some of the testimony given for this lesson is taken directly from congressional records, some is paraphrased to make it more accessible to students, and some is made up in order to facilitate the discussion. The activity is presented in the form of a council meeting to encourage students to try to build consensus in finding solutions instead of militantly standing behind their own viewpoints.

A historical timeline is provided at the end for additional background information.

 

Acknowledgement

Thanks to Roger Oakes, Lakeridge High School, for his help in refining this activity.

 

Content Standards
Related National Standards:

This lesson addresses the following National Content Standards found at: http://books.nap.edu/html/nses

 

Content Standard C: As a result of their activities in grades 9-12, all students should develop understanding of:

  • Interdependence of organisms.
    • Human beings live within the world's ecosystems. Increasingly, humans modify ecosystems as a result of population growth, technology, and consumption. Human destruction of habitats through direct harvesting, pollution, atmospheric changes, and other factors are threatening current global stability, and if not addressed, ecosystems will be irreversibly affected.

Content Standard F: As a result of their activities in grades 9-12, all students should develop understanding of:

  • Natural resources
    • Humans use many natural systems as resources. Natural systems have the capacity to reuse waste, but that capacity is limited. Natural systems can change to an extent that exceeds the limits of organisms to adapt naturally. · Environmental Quality
    • Many factors influence environmental quality. Factors that students might investigate include population growth, resource use, population distribution, over consumption, the capacity of technology to solve problems, poverty, the role of economic, political, and religions views, and different ways humans view the earth.
  • Science and technology in local, national, and global challenges
    • Understanding basic concepts and principles of science and technology should precede active debate about the economics, policies, politics, and ethics of various science- and technology-related challenges. However, understanding science alone will not resolve local, national, or global challenges.
    • Humans have a major effect on other species. For example, the influence of humans on other organisms occurs through land use - which decreases space available to other species - and pollution - which changes the chemical composition of air, soil, and water.
Extension Web Sites from PBS:

Online Newshour - Rush to Market
This is a transcript from the Jim Lehrer newshour in which people discuss the issue of salmon vs. development in the Seattle area and will give students another example of the complexities of this issue!

The American Experience - Divided over Dams
This site provides a text that covers the pros and cons of dam building.

Nature - Fish Food
Look at this site for a brief rundown of the salmon life cycle.

The Living Edens - Kamchatka: Land of Abundant Salmon ... Filets
This is a lesson plan teaching about anadromous fish and the salmon life cycle. Includes video and a fish dissection activity.

Anyplace Wild - Salmon and Alaska
This site contains a list of salmon facts, description of the Native American relationship to salmon, and other relevant Internet connections.

Activity 1: Land Use Controversies - The Stakeholders
Time Allotted:

15 minutes

 

Materials:

Large paper and markers or chalkboard space and chalk for brainstorming

 

Objectives:
  • Students will describe possible conflicts between various people in land-use issues.

Brainstorm Activity:
  • Ask the students to imagine a pristine wilderness in your area. Have them brainstorm with a partner or as a group "who can you think of that might be interested in the value of this area". Have them come up with as many people or groups of people that they can think of.
Watch the AFG Video Segment:

Sipsey Wilderness - Clash of Viewpoints
Differing viewpoints about wilderness preservation and resource utilization have existed for hundreds of years.
  • Ask students to add to their list after watching the video.
  • If they have made their lists in small groups, have the groups report to the class as a whole and compile a class list of possible stakeholders in a land use debate.

 

Discussion Questions:
  • Who is right?
  • Which uses are incompatible with each other?
  • Who do you think should be able to determine the use for the land?
Activity 2: The Elwha River Council
Time Allotted:

Two class periods with two optional 20-minute extensions (these can be done as homework).

 

Materials:

Copies of the 8 personal statements (1 statement for each group) and student instruction sheet. Photocopy the student instructions on to the back of each of the personal statements. Each student should get a copy of one personal statement and the instructions.

Directions for Council Members

Poster Board or paper for visual aids (materials for 8 groups)

 

Objectives:
  • Students will develop an understanding of a conflict between the needs of society (dams and hydropower) and natural resources (salmon and the native ecosystem).
  • Students will be able to describe opposing points of view in a major controversy.
  • Students will work in small groups to understand a perspective relating to the issue of power generation and salmon fisheries.
  • Students will use roll playing to explain a perspective regarding the removal of dams in a small river system to a larger group.
  • Students will build consensus to try to come up with a solution to the problem of salmon vs. dams.
Part 1: Preparation

Time allotted: 1 class period

  1. Break students into eight small groups who will represent the eight different community perspectives and one group of 4-6 students who will serve as Council members. Any students who are absent on this first day can also serve as Council members at the final meeting. Give the students in each community group copies of one of the personal statements along with the student instructions. Give each of the Council members a copy of the Elwha Council Instructions and Historical Background and Outline to review.
  2. Optional: You may want to give these out in the prior class period and have them read the statements for homework. Have them write a one-page description of the person's perspective in their own words. They should include: who they are, how they are connected to the problem, their views on the problem, and how the student would feel if they were in the same position as their character. Students also might include an outline of the main points or arguments their character provides.
  3. Students will spend the first class period preparing for the Council meeting: outlining their arguments, making a visual to provide to the Council, and electing a spokesperson who will present their arguments to the Council. Have students watch the related AFG Video Clip to get some more perspective on the issues that might be important to their character. They might also spend some time brainstorming possible solutions that would be acceptable to their characters.

Note: Another option for this activity is to not have separate Council group. Presentations would be given to the entire class and all students would participate in the questioning and deliberations.

 

 

Part 2: The Council

Time allotted: 1 class period

  1. Place students in a circle.
  2. The spokesperson for each group will present their arguments to the general council.
  3. The council will have time to ask questions of each group.
  4. The council will then break while students meet in small groups to come up with ideas for possible solutions. These discussion groups should a mixture of students representing all the different community perspectives. Encourage students to work toward a solution that is acceptable to all sides.
  5. Have each group present their ideas to the Council.
  6. If there is time, the Council can meet privately to deliberate and make a final decision. They will present their final plans to the group at large.
Part 3: Synthesis

Time allotted: 20 minutes

Using the Environmental Decision Making Model, students should answer the question: "Should the dams on the Elwha River be removed". This should be done individually.

 

Suggested Assessment

Use the assessment rubric below to score student presentations for this activity.

Elwha River Project Rubric:

Clearly & Seriously presents points as expressed by their person
5
4
3
2
1
Visual Aid Enhances the presentation
5
4
3
2
1
Personal synthesis(taking on character)
5
4
3
2
1
Polite to other participants
5
4
3
2
1
Works with group to try to come up with a solution
5
4
3
2
1
Participation in whole process
5
4
3
2
1

 

Note: The Environmental Decision Making Model can be used to evaluate individual student understanding. We often use it to help students format essays on a test.

Extension Activities
  • Watch 'When the Salmon Runs Dry.' A 60-minute video outlining the larger debate surrounding the economy of saving the salmon. Available from Oregon Public Broadcasting.
  • The Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act was passed in 1992. Since then, there has been a lot of debate, and some action, regarding the two dams on the river. Students can conduct research using the Internet and news databases such as SIRS to learn what has happened regarding the dams since the passage of the Elwha River Act. Alternatively, they might research the facts on the dam before beginning this debate.
  • They then may want to write their congressmen stating their opinions on what should be done.
Related Web Sites

For more information, see
Elwha River Restoration Project
Elwha Restoration Project Office

To contact your congressman
Contacting the Congress