Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Rediscovering George Washington
Washington: Father of His Country The Washington Collection
Washington in the Classroom About the Program
Timeline: George Washington's Life Milestones
Multimedia Room Search the Site
Gilder Lehrman Collection Documents
Gilder Lehrman Collection Images
Other Documents
Gilder Lehrman Collection Documents
Letter to Jonathan Trumbull, July 21, 1799
TRANSCRIPT GLC 5787
George Washington. Autograph letter signed: Mount Vernon, to Jonathan Trumbull, 1799 July 21. 7 p.

Mount Vernon 21st July 1799

My dear Sir,

Your favour of the 22d. Ulto. got to my hands yesterday, only. It came safe, and without any apparent marks of violence; but whence the length of its passage, I am unable to inform you.

For you, and to your brother Colo[nel] Jno. Trumbull I feel much indebted for the full, frank and interesting communication of the political sentiments contained in both your letters.

The project of the latter is vast, and under any circumstances would require very mature consideration; but in its extent, and an eye being had to the disorganizing Party in the United States, I am sure it would be impracticable in the present order of things.

Not being able to convey my ideas to you, on this subject, in more concise terms than I have already done to your brother, in answer to the letter he informs you he had written to me, I shall take the liberty of giving you an extract thereof – as follow. –

[2] “For the Political information contained in it (that is his letter) I feel grateful, as I always shall for the free, & unreserved communication of your sentiments upon subjects so important in their nature, and tendency. No well informed and unprejudiced man, who has viewed with attention the conduct of the French Government since the Revolution in that Country, can mistake its objects, or the tendency of the ambitious projects it is pursuing. Yet, strange as it may seem, a party, and a powerful one too, among us, affect to believe that the measures of it are dictated by a principle of self preservation; that the outrages of which the Directory are guilty, proceed from dire necessity; that it wishes to be upon upon [sic] the most friendly & amicable terms with the United States; that it will be the fault of the latter if this is not the case; that the defensive measures which this Country have adopted, are not only unnecessary & expensive, but have a tendency to produce the evil which, to deprecate, is mere pretence in the Government; because War with France they [3] say, is its wish; that on the Militia we sh[oul]d rest our security; and that it is time enough to call upon these, when the danger is imminent, & apparent.

“With these, and such like ideas, attempted to be inculcated upon the public mind (aided by prejudices not yet eradicated) and with art and sophistry, which regard neither truth nor decency; attacking every character, without respect to persons, Public or Private, who happen to differ from themselves in Politics. I leave you to decide on the probability of carrying such an extensive plan of defence as you have suggested in your last letter, into operation; and in the short period which you suppose may be allowed to accomplish it in.”

I come now, my dear Sir, to pay particular attention to that part of your Letter which respects myself.

I remember well, the conversation which you allude to, and have not forgot the answer I gave you. In my judgement it applies with as much force now, as then; nay more, because at that time the line between [4] Parties was not so clearly drawn, and the views of the opposition, so clearly developed as they are at present; of course, allowing your observation (as it respects myself) to be founded, personal influence would be of no avail.

Let that party set up a broomstick, and call it a true son of Liberty, a Democrat, or give it any other epithet that will suit their purpose, and it will command their votes in toto!* [Washington’s footnote, written at bottom of page: * As an analysis of this position, look to the pending Election of Governor, in Pennsylvania.] Will not the Federalists meet, or rather defend their cause on the opposite ground? Surely they must, or they will discover a want of Policy, indicative of weakness, & pregnant of mischief, which cannot be admitted. Wherein then would lye the difference between the present Gentleman in Office, & Myself?

It would be [a] matter of sore regret to me, if I could believe that a serious tho[ugh]t was turned towards me as his successor; not only as it respects my ardent wishes to pass through the vale of life in retirem[en]t, undisturbed in the remnant of the days I [5] have to sojourn here, unless called upon to defend my country (which every citizen is bound to do), but on Public ground also; for although I have abundant cause to be thankful for the good health with wh[ic]h I am blessed, yet I am not insensible to my declination in other respects. It would be criminal therefore in me, although it should be the wish of my Country men, and I could be elected, to accept an Office under this conviction, which another would discharge with more ability; and this too at a time when I am thoroughly convinced I should not draw a single vote from the anti-federal side; and of course, should stand upon no stronger ground then any other Federal character well supported; & when I should become a mark for the shafts of envenomed malice, and the basest calumny to fire at; when I should be charged not only with irresolution, but with concealed ambition, which wants only an occasion to blaze out, and, in short, with dotage and imbecility.

All this I grant ought to be like [6] dust in the balance, when put in compet[it]ion with a great public good, when the accomplishment of it is apparent. But as no problem is better defined in my mind than that principle, not men, is now, and will be, the object of contention, and that I could not obtain a solitary vote from that Party; that any other respectable Federal character would receive the same suffrages that I should; that at my time of life, (verging towards three score & ten) I should expose myself without rendering any essential service to my Country, or answering the end contemplated; Prudence on my my [sic] part must arrest any attempt of the well meant, but mistaken views of my friends, to introduce me again into the Chair of Government.

Lengthy as this letter is, I cannot conclude it without expressing an earnest wish that, some intimate & confidential [inserted: friend] of the President would give him to understand that, his long absence from the seat of Government in the present critical conjuncture, affords matter for severe [7] animadversion by the friends of government; who speak of it with much disapprobation; while the other Party chuckle at, and set it down as a favourable omen for themselves. It has been suggested to me to make this communication, but I have declined it, conceiving that it would be better received from a private character, more in the habits of social intercourse and friendship. With the most sincere friendship, and affectionate regard,

I am always, Your Obedient Servant,
Go: Washington.

His Excellency Jonathan Trumbull


Notes: Fitzpatrick, Writings of Washington, 29: 312-314, transcribed from a letterpress copy at the New York Public Library. This is one of Washington’s most important political letters. This letter has a docket on p. 8 and also a later note on p. 7 reading: “Copied for Washington Irving / October 8, 1858.” Washington’s footnote alludes to the campaign of Thomas McKean, soon to be elected governor of Pennsylvania. His closing remarks concern President Adams’s spending much of his time away from the capital.