Idea Lab is a group blog by innovators who are reinventing community news for the Digital Age.
Each Idea Lab blogger is a winner of the Knight News Challenge grant to reshape community news.
Learn more about the Knight News Challenge »
There's been extensive coverage (here, here, here, and here) in the last week of the arrest and subsequent dismissal of charges against Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin, the founders of the Phoenix New Times, a print and online newspaper. Lacey and Larkin were arrested for violating Arizona's grand jury secrecy statute,
which makes it a criminal offense for anyone to disclose a "matter attending a grand jury proceeding," after they published details from a grand jury subpoena they received.
In a post published on our site yesterday, the Citizen Media Law Project's assistant director Sam Bayard offered a careful analysis of the facts and law involved in the case.
While we believe the Arizona statute is overbroad and violates the First Amendment, the case highlights the importance of knowing the laws -- especially the quirky local laws -- that apply to your newsgathering and publishing activities. Even if you decide to go forward with a planned course of action, it's important to understand your potential legal liability so that your decision can be made with full knowledge of the risks involved.
It may be that Lacey and Larkin had consulted legal counsel to understand Arizona's grand jury secrecy law before they made the decision to publish, but most freelance and non-traditional journalists don't have a lawyer on hand. As we roll out our citizen media legal guide, which will cover grand jury secrecy rules, we hope that the Citizen Media Law Project can start to fill this gap.
In a post published on our site yesterday, the Citizen Media Law Project's assistant director Sam Bayard offered a careful analysis of the facts and law involved in the case.
While we believe the Arizona statute is overbroad and violates the First Amendment, the case highlights the importance of knowing the laws -- especially the quirky local laws -- that apply to your newsgathering and publishing activities. Even if you decide to go forward with a planned course of action, it's important to understand your potential legal liability so that your decision can be made with full knowledge of the risks involved.
It may be that Lacey and Larkin had consulted legal counsel to understand Arizona's grand jury secrecy law before they made the decision to publish, but most freelance and non-traditional journalists don't have a lawyer on hand. As we roll out our citizen media legal guide, which will cover grand jury secrecy rules, we hope that the Citizen Media Law Project can start to fill this gap.
Post a Comment
Featured Comment
The translation plug-in sounds like a very good idea: we at times have
long lines in Portuguese shops... or you can use it on the bus... ”
— Fer Pili
Knight Rewards On-the-Spot Competitors at MIT Meetup
Topics
Monthly Archives
Get Idea Lab via E-mail


Creative Commons Attribution NC SA 3.0 License
2 comments so far, Add Yours
Ian Monroe said:
October 26, 2007 12:01 PM
The Phoenix New Times is not the only alt-weekly with legal problems these days. See also http://www.orlandoweekly.com/features/story.asp?id=11910
for the story of how three classified advertising representatives were arrested by Orlando vice cops last week.
Benjamin Melançon said:
October 27, 2007 7:36 AM
Congratulations on CitMediaLaw's new audio podcast! Colin Rhinesmith of both the Action Coalition for Media Education (ACME) and Citizen Media Law Project posted to the ACME list today.
Takeaway quotation from the podcast was by David Ardia on the House version of the federal shield bill that limits it to those who enjoy substantial financial gain from media work:
This is in part why I'm so keen to define news and journalism as a step undergirding all the work we're doing.
(Unrelated related content note: both ACMEcoalition.org and CitMediaLaw.org run on Drupal.)
Subscribe to comments for this entry.