Legal Issues »

  • Share
Underwritten by John S. and James L. Knight Foundation

Idea Lab is a group blog by innovators who are reinventing community news for the Digital Age.

Read more about Idea Lab »

  • Check out Idea Lab Sponsorship opportunities!

  • Follow us on Twitter »
  • Each Idea Lab blogger is a winner of the Knight News Challenge grant to reshape community news.

    Learn more about the Knight News Challenge »

    U.S. House Passes Federal Shield Bill, Changes Who is Covered

    Knight 2007 News Challenge Winner
    One of the things we are doing at the Citizen Media Law Project is keeping our eye on new legislation that might have an impact on non-traditional journalists. 

    Yesterday, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed -- for the first time ever -- a federal shield bill by a vote of 398 to 21. This follows on the heels of the Senate Judiciary Committee's passage of a similar bill on October 4. The House version, however, makes a critical change in the language regarding who is entitled to the bill's qualified protections by excluding those who do not receive "substantial financial gain" for their journalistic activities.

    This change significantly narrows the bill's coverage and is plainly aimed to exclude non-traditional journalists. But it doesn't just exclude those whom some in Congress derisively call "bloggers." The new definition would likely exclude many freelance journalists who must rely on other work to supplement their incomes. Do we really want judges to be deciding whether a journalist is earning enough money to qualify for protection?

    More to the point, is financial remuneration the criterion we want to be using when we draw the line between those who are entitled to engage in journalism under the protection of a federal shield law and those who must venture forth unprotected? It seems to me the answer is no. To limit the privilege only to journalists who receive "substantial financial gain" misses the point of how media and journalism are evolving. Most crucially, it misses the growing -- and essential -- role of citizen media creators. They are the closest analog since the nation's founding to the Tom Paine-style pamphleteers the First Amendment was designed, in part, to encourage.

    Journalists -- and more importantly, the public -- desperately need a federal shield law. But what we need is a federal shield law that protects all acts of journalism regardless of whether they are done for pay.

    You can read a longer discussion of the House and Senate bills on our blog.  We've also created a set of shield law resources that provide additional background on the subject and provide information on federal and state shield protections.




    Rate this entry

    • Currently 3.7/5
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

    Rating: 3.7/5 (6 votes cast)

    Check out MediaShift Sponsorship opportunities! mediashift mixer collabspace promo.jpg

    Featured Comment

    I guess that combining the fixed rules for audio, video, image and text will be significant, as are the "open" intuitive based rules that the user contributes.

    jerry
    Zeega: Algorithm Isn't Just Another Word for Automation

    Monthly Archives