As I explained in a post on the Citizen Media Law Project's blog two weeks ago, the legislation substantially reforms the Freedom of Information Act and expands the definition of who is a "representative of the news media" under FOIA. This change would significantly benefit bloggers and non-traditional journalists by making them eligible for reduced processing and duplication fees that are available to "representatives of the news media." The new law accomplishes this by adding the following language to FOIA:
[T]he term 'a representative of the news media' means any person or entity that gathers information of potential interest to a segment of the public, uses its editorial skills to turn the raw materials into a distinct work, and distributes that work to an audience. In this clause, the term 'news' means information that is about current events or that would be of current interest to the public. Examples of news-media entities are television or radio stations broadcasting to the public at large and publishers of periodicals (but only if such entities qualify as disseminators of 'news') who make their products available for purchase by or subscription by or free distribution to the general public. These examples are not all-inclusive. Moreover, as methods of news delivery evolve (for example, the adoption of the electronic dissemination of newspapers through telecommunications services), such alternative media shall be considered to be news-media entities.
Other important reforms include:
- Broadening the scope of information that can be requested by including government contracting information held by private contractors;
- Assigning public tracking numbers to all requests;
- Denying agencies that exceed the 20-day deadline for responses the right to charge requesters for search or copying costs;
- Making it easier to collect attorneys' fees for those who must sue to force compliance with their FOIA requests; and
- Establishing an office at the National Archives to accept citizen complaints, issue opinions on requests, and foster best practices within the government.
The full text of the OPEN Government Act of 2007 is available here. The press release announcing the President's signing is available on the White House website.
Creative Commons Attribution NC SA 3.0 License
2 comments so far, Add Yours
Thomas Jackson said:
January 2, 2008 5:25 AM
When the President signed the Open Government Act of 2007 in the 11th Hour, he did nonetheless crack the door. It will take a full year for Government to become “open,” with the built in12 month delay in the in new law, but it will open the door. For the first time since the original act was implemented, federal government officials can be held accountable for violating the law. Had this new act been in place last year, the officials that used and twisted the act to keep documents out of the hands of a Coast Guard employee would be on a Federal Court Docket trying to stave off fines and jail time. TJ
And as a blogger am I a journalist? I certainly have more readers in more countries around the world than many small papers I'm aware of. My site stats support that.
Bloggers Payback said:
October 9, 2009 5:08 PM
For starters, duplicate content could never have been considered a problem, despite the fact that bloggers can now also be labeled as journalists. As with so many things over the years, the term journalist is now starting to enter a gray area of definition as brought on by the blogging platform available to anyone. It's very interesting to note that, as Thomas said, we as bloggers certainly have a much wider exposure and reach than conventional journalists, making it a medium that was rightfully addressed by the government.
Subscribe to comments for this entry.