Best Practices »

Underwritten by John S. and James L. Knight Foundation

Idea Lab is a group blog by innovators who are reinventing community news for the Digital Age.

Read more about Idea Lab »

  • Check out Idea Lab Sponsorship opportunities!

  • Follow us on Twitter »
  • Each Idea Lab blogger is a winner of the Knight News Challenge grant to reshape community news.

    Learn more about the Knight News Challenge »

    The Leadership Vacuum in Journalism

    Ideas are cheap; execution is everything. There are several factors that come into play to make the difference between a successful and a failed execution. One of those factors is leadership.

    There are different kinds of leaders. Some lead from the front. (William Wallace comes to mind.) But, in war at least, we haven't had a general lead from the front since Alexander the Great. It simply drains a person too much to lead from the front, especially on a modern battlefield where too much is happening all at once.

    Some lead like ants, working hard and getting others to follow in line. Others lead like owls, giving sage advice in a calm and zen-like manner. Still others lead like puppies, bringing an unparalleled enthusiasm to galvanize others into action.

    So the question is: What types of leadership does journalism need now?

    A generation ago, we needed people who could take small newspapers and turn them into thriving businesses, people who could lead because of their stature, cut-throat competitiveness, and business savvy. The journalism industry has different goals and needs now. Today, we need flexibility, innovation, community, collaboration and tech-savvy, to name a few things.

    Which begs the question: Do we need new leaders? This isn't a question relating to specific people, but characteristic traits.

    I have often used the chessboard as an analogy for the state of journalism: "Content is king, collaboration is queen, the board itself is transparency." But the game of chess needs a leader, somebody who can step back, look at the board and make decisions.

    Just as a William Wallace-type general would be ineffective on a modern battlefield, could a William Randolph Hearst make it in today's journalism environment? What new characteristics would Hearst need to nurture? What would be outright foolish in today's culture? More importantly, is journalism suffering a brain drain? What new leaders are we losing to other industries?

    I went to my Tweeple for some thoughts.

    What do you think? Share your thoughts on the leadership needed in journalism in the comments below or by replying on Twitter to my tweet (which will then show up above).

    Rate this entry

    • Currently 5/5
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

    Rating: 5/5 (2 votes cast)

    Check out MediaShift Sponsorship opportunities!

    Featured Comment

    I think newspapers, blogs, and magazines should all be doing audio versions. I grew up enjoying and listening to audiobooks and now I don't have the same option for the short form content that I prefer to consume.

    Will Mayo
    Do Touch That Dial: Turn Your Newspaper Into a Radio Station

    Newsletters

    MediaShift delivers the best news on media and technology directly to your in-box.

    Monthly Archives