Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

All-American Presidential Forums on PBS" Moderated by Tavis Smiley

HomeThe CandidatesThe IssuesYour QuestionsElection ResourcesVideoAbout the ForumsTranscript
THE ISSUES

MORE ON TAVIS SMILEY

VIEWER POLL

Should the federal government ensure that all communities meet health and environmental standards?

The government should do what it can to ensure clean environmental standards in all communities but should not be held accountable if environmental standards slip.
The government should not be held responsible for environmental degradation generated by non-governmental businesses but should be held responsible for any pollution generated by government agencies.
The government should be obligated to intervene on behalf of its citizens when third-party businesses exploit the environment, and if it fails to do so, the government should be punished for its inaction.

 

Polls are not scientific

RELATED LINKS

Wangari Maathai

"When people are not aware of the need to have a healthy environment, in fact, they end up living in a very sordid environment. Their environment becomes polluted, sometimes people even throw pollution in their neighborhoods, because they know that those people are not aware. So it's very, very important for people to understand the value of the environment."
Wangari Maathai
Nobel Laureate
Environmental Activist

Read the interview

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE

While most communities in the U.S. meet federal environmental standards, many low-income people of color live in grossly polluted areas. A recent study1 found that African Americans are 79% more likely than whites to live in neighborhoods where industrial pollution is suspected of posing the greatest health danger. These communities often lack adequate funds and resources to affect local environmental policy.

The issue of environment is also an issue of public health. Citizens in communities bordering hazardous waste dumps, polluted water and carbon-heavy areas of trade have some of the highest risks2 of developing cancer, as well as cardiovascular and respiratory disease. Children are especially vulnerable. Asthma rates among youth continue to grow in these areas, making the disease the leading cause3 for school absenteeism in the U.S. African American children are 5 times4 more likely to die from asthma than white American children.

On the minds of many Americans:

1 Health costs versus environmental costs—do the health costs we accrue as a nation due to poor environmental standards make it economically viable to clean up polluted areas?

2 Renewables and clean energy—how can new sources of cleaner energy be implemented to improve environmental and health conditions in America's communities?

3 Third-party involvement—with the majority of pollution in these communities being generated by third parties (not those living in the community), is this environmental issue also a human rights issue?

4 Limited time and resources—how do communities with limited time and resources mobilize to demand better environmental standards from the government?

5 Neighboring port communities—since trade is expected to triple in major U.S. ports by 2010, if clean energy is not introduced, how will neighboring port communities be adversely affected?

What do you think?

 

SEND PAGE TO

View Point

Share your thoughts on these and other issues related to environmental justice.

SHARE YOUR COMMENT

Name  

E-Mail Address  

City & State  

Message  

You may post this with my name

You may post this without my name

Please do not post this

Comments are moderated and will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. They may be edited for length and clarity. We will never share or publish your e-mail address.