Viewer Comments! Episode 1
Here is a delightful rant from a viewer in Washington, D.C. who
rightfully assumes that people on TV have no soul or feelings. I'll
address each segment:
Chris Hardwick needs to work on
presentation and language skills. When he's doing a walk-through on the
set reading the script, he's fine, but on the What's Inside and Hack
segments he's terrible.
I are think you very much smart. Maybely you can to teach on me you superior skill. I for to hanging my head inside the shame.
He's
got way too many verbal ticks, using "uh" and "umm" several times in
each sentence. He should stick to the script and not try to improvise
and be funny.
Good point on the former. I accept responsibility
for the "uh's." They should edit them out but for some reason the
editors must really like them. A little behind the scenes for you:
We're usually on a very tight schedule when we shoot "What's Inside,"
and what
you see is more often than not the first time I've had time to go
through
everything. It can be a challenge to get through ten constituent
elements all with wonderful chemical
names and purposes that have to be pulled up and placed very
specifically for the camera in less than five minutes while talking
really fast. Still, that's no excuse and I concede to your criticism.
As
to your second point, you're right, ya cantankerous old crank! I really
shouldn't try to make science different or fun---a nice 50's health
film approach would be much more bromidic. I'd hate to have anyone
outside the AARP stay awake and learn anything. I do humbly apologize.
I hope your scathing comment helped dissipate some of the vitriol that
you felt so that it wouldn't show its face to your friends and family,
as is probably the case most of the time.
And everyone
who's been to middle and high school knows you don't mix chemicals
without safety glasses and gloves; you're asking for an accident and a
lawsuit.
First of all, great use of the semi-colon! Secondly,
it's true! I was asking for those things SO HARD...but to my
disappointment, neither happened. No kidding around, though,
people---you ABSOLUTELY should use safety gear when playing with
chemicals, or when spewing liquid hatred onto your computer, like this
poster.
Washington, DC
I'm sure most of your anger stems from your taxation without representation.
Well,
I'm off to work on those presentation and language skills at
Presentation and Language College. Keep those hateful sentiments
rolling in! You might just make an episode of "Viewer Comments!"
Tags: anger, disdain, hate, lonliness, uh umm, Viewer Comments







Blog RSS Feed













7 Comments
+ Add Comment
November 5, 2007 3:43 PM
cvj
Hey Chris,
For what it's worth, I'd say almost the precise opposite. (And I've heard others express delight in the segments too!) The slightly rough and off-the-cuff style that you bring to the presentation -especially the What's Inside and Hack pieces- are great. Uhms and Ahs included (I'm glad the editor keeps them in - we use them in ordinary speech, so why not here?) There's enough over-polished and bejeweled glitz out there on television at the expense of content already. Who needs more of it? Also, the looseness of the presentation gives the show more of an accessible feel. People are more likely to go out and find out (or at least think about) what's inside if they can relate to it as something they might do themselves rather casually. If it was a highly polished segment, I don't think people would relate to it as much.
It is like the difference between reading a super-glossy magazine like Angeleno and reading the LA Weekly or the Village Voice. Good things can be found in all three (no, really!!), but I prefer the latter two for content and accessibility. So my vote is - It ain't broke, so don't fix it!
Cheers,
-cvj
P.S. Readers can look at my unashamedly appreciative remarks on some of the segments here:
http://asymptotia.com/2007/10/26/hack/
http://asymptotia.com/2007/10/03/wired-science-show-tonight-and-website-is-live/
November 7, 2007 3:10 PM
Troped
Personally, I hope that more people spew vitriol about you so that you'll respond to it. This was one of the funniest things I read today.
November 15, 2007 10:29 PM
Tara C. Smith
Wait, that was vitriol? I should introduce you to some of the commenters on my blog...
November 16, 2007 8:48 PM
A
Don't worry Chris, you're still hot!
November 21, 2007 6:20 PM
Emma
I love seeing you in your element. The show is brilliant, timely and well done. You just make it fun and talk in the same vernacular that I think. You rock, your podcasts are like frickin' catnip.
Nerds (2 squared) ever! Thank you.
Just a geek loving gal
February 26, 2008 11:39 AM
Jill
please, for the love of all that is holy, do NOT stop improvising and being funny, that's all you have going for you! I'm so kidding but please, there are many of us out there that delight in your wit and humor.
March 3, 2008 11:37 PM
Chris
I don't know if Wired Science advertises it enough, but I think a couple pokes toward Wired magazine could complete the lives of a few Wired Science fans (as it did mine). I thoroughly enjoy your Hard N Phirm science music album (poke, poke). And how about a What's Inside Instant Ramen? Is that interesting enough?
Post your comment