AboutAbout

A group blog composed of scientists, show hosts and producers, Correlations is the official blog of WIRED SCIENCE. Tips, questions or comments? E-mail us at correlations@kcet.org.

BloggersBloggers

Liz Burr
Liz Burr

is the Interactive Project Manager for WIRED SCIENCE Digital.

Damon Gambuto
Damon Gambuto

is a producer on the WIRED SCIENCE television series.

Tamsin Gray
Tamsin Gray

is living in Antarctica to research climate change and the ozone hole.

Chris Hardwick
Chris Hardwick

is a co-host on the WIRED SCIENCE television series.

Clifford Johnson
Clifford Johnson

is a professor of Physics at the University of Southern California.

Sheril Kirshenbaum
Sheril Kirshenbaum

is a marine biologist at Duke University.

Tara C. Smith
Tara C. Smith

is an assistant professor of epidemiology in Iowa.

Michael Tobis
Michael Tobis

is a climatologist at UT Austin working on improving climate models.

Ziya Tong
Ziya Tong

is a host and field producer for WIRED SCIENCE.

WIRED Science blogWIRED Science blog

WIRED Science MyBlogLogWIRED Science MyBlogLog

11.05.07

Viewer Comments! Episode 1

Chris Hardwick by Chris Hardwick     Department: Behind the Scenes


Here is a delightful rant from a viewer in Washington, D.C. who rightfully assumes that people on TV have no soul or feelings. I'll address each segment:

Chris Hardwick needs to work on presentation and language skills. When he's doing a walk-through on the set reading the script, he's fine, but on the What's Inside and Hack segments he's terrible.
I are think you very much smart. Maybely you can to teach on me you superior skill. I for to hanging my head inside the shame.

He's got way too many verbal ticks, using "uh" and "umm" several times in each sentence. He should stick to the script and not try to improvise and be funny.
Good point on the former. I accept responsibility for the "uh's." They should edit them out but for some reason the editors must really like them. A little behind the scenes for you: We're usually on a very tight schedule when we shoot "What's Inside," and what you see is more often than not the first time I've had time to go through everything. It can be a challenge to get through ten constituent elements all with wonderful chemical names and purposes that have to be pulled up and placed very specifically for the camera in less than five minutes while talking really fast. Still, that's no excuse and I concede to your criticism.

As to your second point, you're right, ya cantankerous old crank! I really shouldn't try to make science different or fun---a nice 50's health film approach would be much more bromidic. I'd hate to have anyone outside the AARP stay awake and learn anything. I do humbly apologize. I hope your scathing comment helped dissipate some of the vitriol that you felt so that it wouldn't show its face to your friends and family, as is probably the case most of the time.

And everyone who's been to middle and high school knows you don't mix chemicals without safety glasses and gloves; you're asking for an accident and a lawsuit.
First of all, great use of the semi-colon! Secondly, it's true! I was asking for those things SO HARD...but to my disappointment, neither happened. No kidding around, though, people---you ABSOLUTELY should use safety gear when playing with chemicals, or when spewing liquid hatred onto your computer, like this poster.

Washington, DC
I'm sure most of your anger stems from your taxation without representation.

Well, I'm off to work on those presentation and language skills at Presentation and Language College. Keep those hateful sentiments rolling in! You might just make an episode of "Viewer Comments!"

Tags: anger, disdain, hate, lonliness, uh umm, Viewer Comments

CommentsComments

7 Comments

+ Add Comment

Hey Chris,

For what it's worth, I'd say almost the precise opposite. (And I've heard others express delight in the segments too!) The slightly rough and off-the-cuff style that you bring to the presentation -especially the What's Inside and Hack pieces- are great. Uhms and Ahs included (I'm glad the editor keeps them in - we use them in ordinary speech, so why not here?) There's enough over-polished and bejeweled glitz out there on television at the expense of content already. Who needs more of it? Also, the looseness of the presentation gives the show more of an accessible feel. People are more likely to go out and find out (or at least think about) what's inside if they can relate to it as something they might do themselves rather casually. If it was a highly polished segment, I don't think people would relate to it as much.

It is like the difference between reading a super-glossy magazine like Angeleno and reading the LA Weekly or the Village Voice. Good things can be found in all three (no, really!!), but I prefer the latter two for content and accessibility. So my vote is - It ain't broke, so don't fix it!

Cheers,

-cvj


P.S. Readers can look at my unashamedly appreciative remarks on some of the segments here:

http://asymptotia.com/2007/10/26/hack/

http://asymptotia.com/2007/10/03/wired-science-show-tonight-and-website-is-live/

Personally, I hope that more people spew vitriol about you so that you'll respond to it. This was one of the funniest things I read today.

Wait, that was vitriol? I should introduce you to some of the commenters on my blog...

Don't worry Chris, you're still hot!

I love seeing you in your element. The show is brilliant, timely and well done. You just make it fun and talk in the same vernacular that I think. You rock, your podcasts are like frickin' catnip.
Nerds (2 squared) ever! Thank you.
Just a geek loving gal

please, for the love of all that is holy, do NOT stop improvising and being funny, that's all you have going for you! I'm so kidding but please, there are many of us out there that delight in your wit and humor.

I don't know if Wired Science advertises it enough, but I think a couple pokes toward Wired magazine could complete the lives of a few Wired Science fans (as it did mine). I thoroughly enjoy your Hard N Phirm science music album (poke, poke). And how about a What's Inside Instant Ramen? Is that interesting enough?

Post your comment