AboutAbout

A group blog composed of scientists, show hosts and producers, Correlations is the official blog of WIRED SCIENCE. Tips, questions or comments? E-mail us at correlations@kcet.org.

BloggersBloggers

Liz Burr
Liz Burr

is the Interactive Project Manager for WIRED SCIENCE Digital.

Damon Gambuto
Damon Gambuto

is a producer on the WIRED SCIENCE television series.

Tamsin Gray
Tamsin Gray

is living in Antarctica to research climate change and the ozone hole.

Chris Hardwick
Chris Hardwick

is a co-host on the WIRED SCIENCE television series.

Clifford Johnson
Clifford Johnson

is a professor of Physics at the University of Southern California.

Sheril Kirshenbaum
Sheril Kirshenbaum

is a marine biologist at Duke University.

Tara C. Smith
Tara C. Smith

is an assistant professor of epidemiology in Iowa.

Michael Tobis
Michael Tobis

is a climatologist at UT Austin working on improving climate models.

Ziya Tong
Ziya Tong

is a host and field producer for WIRED SCIENCE.

WIRED Science blogWIRED Science blog

WIRED Science MyBlogLogWIRED Science MyBlogLog

12.06.07

How to Say When

Damon Gambuto by Damon Gambuto     Department: Culture


So I'm back from an extended Thanksgiving holiday and I've been thinking about overconsuming.  The percentage of my wardrobe that I can wear without feeling as though it's an act of mortification seems to be decreasing at an alarming rate, but that's just the beginning.

My self-loathing has metastasized to include all of the implications of my over-consumption.  I've been thinking about how much energy those of us occupying space on the streets and highways of First World nations (or what The World Bank would term "high income countries") use.

How much energy does this life of mine relative to, say, a fellow on the streets Ethiopia, use?    Turns out, more - a lot more - and not just around the holidays.  Each year my lifestyle demands about 531 times as much energy as that "for-perspective-average-developing-nation-citizen" I just referenced.

While I can summon mountains of regret about my expanding waistline, I feel (mostly) capable of changing the behavior that leads to this (high income economy) problem. When it comes to figuring out how to live a less energy intensive lifestyle, my dilemma seems deeper than Chicago-style pizza (sidenote: it's neither Chicagoan nor pizza, but that's another story).  

Whence all the reflection and self-loathing?  Truth be told, it's sort of a pastime for me, but this most recent detour into my dark places was borne out of thinking deeply about our economy.  Well, to be honest, I just finished reading Bill McKibben's at once rueful and hopeful book DEEP ECONOMY.  It's an accessible look inside the way we consume all manner of things (energy, food, et al) and how many of our notions of efficiency aren't so.  That is to say, the contemporary mantra of economic growth and its beneficial effects on health, happiness, and the creation of wealth is a little one note.  

McKibben investigates the modes of our free markets (a misnomer, but again, another story) and how they work at making us wealthier in ways that don't seem so "durable" (the word he uses in the stead of sustainable) when one takes into account things economists often ignore with the word "externality."

What we've chosen is an (often ludicrously) energy intensive economy that in its race to grow wealth leaves a lot of people without time to grow up (and by not growing up I mean dying).

McKibben does a great job of explicating the ways that we aren't getting it right, but I confess - as lovely as his farm co-op stories are - I am not moved to think that he offers up so many pragmatic solutions for those of us that don't live in his rural Vermont community.  You see, as of May 23 of this year, most of us live in urban areas.

So what can I do to consume less so that there might be more (i.e., enough) for everyone?  That's the question that seems to be behind my somatization of this First World self-loathing.  Of course we've heard about hybrid cars and compact fluorescent lightbulbs, but are those the deckchairs on our sinking (Space)ship Earth?  Let's hear some of your ideas and over the next few entries I'll mention some of mine.

Tags: economy, energy, holidays, sustainability

CommentsComments

5 Comments

+ Add Comment

Thanks for another enlightened, insightful and well-researched essay.

I'd like your perspective on Kohlberg's "Stages of Moral Development" as it relates to public policy strategies (for energy and health care issues).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kohlberg%27s_stages_of_moral_development

December 7, 2007 12:31 PM

dustin zachary

Yeah! Finally someone is talking about consumerism instead of the oh so fashionable notion of "going green". Who isn't cashing in on this phenomenon? Corporate America certainly has come to realize that the 'green' in "going green" is the color of our almighty U.S. dollar. Everyone is hopping on the bandwagon to sell environmentally friendly products now that it's profitable and as consumers we LOVE this. It's an opportunity to over consume and pat ourselves on the back at the same time. The discussion I'd like to see happen is about curbing consumerism first and going green second. Catchphrases like "carbon footprint" drive me crazy as they make the concept of saving our planet a fad rather than a lifelong pursuit. I realize it has taken almost 30 years to get the average American to realize our planet is in peril but we're getting dangerously close to losing the point to all of this. If we were more like Paul Watson and a less like Al Gore we could seriously whip this planet into shape. Thanks, Damon, for opening up this discussion! You rock! PBS also rocks for having people like you blogging.

I agree about corporate America taking advantage of the latest fad of environmentally safe products. We should think about defining and regulating what constitutes a "green" product. This is sort of like the problems we're having in the organic foods market where companies are fraudulently profiting from "organic" foods that really aren't. All that being said don't knock corporate America for helping to clean up our planet. Who cares how we get there just so long as we get there right?

That's just what we need - more government regulations that only press us toward more consumption. I don't care whether it's organic or green or both. The fact is we're hogs when it comes to this planet's resources so let's stick to discussing on a practical level how we can consume less.

Public policy strategies as they relate to energy and health care issues?!?! There's a surefire way to discuss a lot about nothing and at the same time alienate the backbone of America who doesn't care much for intellectual masturbation. Let's talk about real solutions and ideas for consuming less. Here's a few things I've been practicing: Composting, avoiding bottled/canned drinks altogether and changing my diet to avoid as many prepackaged foods as possible (shop around the perimeter of the supermarket for this - it also forces you to eat extremely healthy). I feel like I could do a lot more. Give me your ideas, Damon.

Post your comment