As the World Cup kicks off in Germany today, there are many mobile services in Europe that are promising to let people watch soccer matches or highlights as they happen. One research firm, Informa, predicted that these mobile broadcasts would bring in $300 million in revenues, particularly in soccer-mad Germany and Italy. So my question to you is whether you'd pay a charge to watch live sports action -- or even highlights -- on your cell phone. Which sport would you pay for -- soccer, American football, hockey, college hoops -- and how much would you be willing to pay? Or do you think TV over mobile phones is not something you care for, and the screen is too small? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and I'll run the best ones in next week's Your Take Roundup.
Multimedia
Best of MediaShift
By This Author
-
@FakeAPStylebook Editors Explain Their Overnight Success on Twitter
For anyone who has suffered through reading the entire AP Stylebook for a journalism class, there's a cathartic release when reading the dry wit of the @FakeAPStylebook feed on Twitter. It combines parody of the journalism usage bible with funny repartee and the absurd. That mix has brought amazing success to the people behind the feed: more than 40,000 followers...
-
Harold Evans Sees Bright Future for Print-on-Demand Newspapers
Evans is the editor-at-large for The Week magazine. He has written numerous books, but his most recent is called "My Paper Chase," a fascinating memoir covering his early years as a cub reporter, copy editor and eventually editor and publisher over decades of distinguished work. He connects what happened in those early years to the changes wrought by technology and the Internet, and what he sees as he watches his wife, Tina Brown, co-found and manage The Daily Beast.
-
4 Minute Roundup: Twitter's Real-Time Search Deals; Bloomberg Rising
Here's the latest 4MR audio report from MediaShift. In this week's edition, I look at the deals Microsoft made recently with Twitter and Facebook to incorporate tweets and status updates into its Bing search engine. Google quickly announced a deal with Twitter too, but why should we care? Also, Bloomberg bought out BusinessWeek magazine, but the jewel might well be...
Stay Informed
-
E-mail List 
News Feed »
Follow us on Twitter »
Who We Are
MediaShift tracks how new media -- from weblogs to podcasts to citizen journalism -- are changing society and culture.
Reader Poll
5 comments so far, Add Yours
Rahul Bhide said:
June 9, 2006 2:01 PM
I would pay to watch highlights or short clips of sports like soccer, Formula 1 or the Paris-Capetown rally on my cell phone. It would be nice if the carrier has some sort of package where I can use GPRS instead of WiFi, and not pay extra for transfer/access.
Peter Files said:
June 10, 2006 12:40 PM
I am a very home grown sports fan in Chicago. South Side. That means White Sox (though I don't mind if the Cubbies go all the way as long as they don't beat the White Sox in the process), da Bears, and the Bulls. The violence that has been the mainstay of pro-hockey has turned me off mostly, though I do like the prices and atmosphere of a considerably less expensive Kane County Cougars game every once in awhile.
However, I do not live and die from game to game, unlike some. So for me, the need to have games broadcast to my cell phone is non-existent.
I will probably change my thinking on this when the 2005 World Champion White Sox hit the playoffs on their way to taking the 2006 Championship, unless it turns out that you cannot see the darned ball on the screen, or tell a ball from a strike. In that case, what's the point? You might as well get a small portable TV with batteries.
Does that mean that my lack of interest should squelch what looks like a highly profitable source of income for the cell industry? With the amount of illegal sports gambling going on in this country, I don't think they have anything to worry about, though they probably should consider a scores update channel or some way for sports viewers to inexpensively switch from game to game, just like TV. Then they will really have them.
It's a good thing that these are U.S. companies and can't take bets too. LOL
Peter,
Chief Spell Wrecker, The Peter Files Blog of Commentary and Comedy
BIll said:
June 10, 2006 5:11 PM
I would definitely pay for live access to sports events. Probably as a season subscription as opposed to any other models.
Ged Carroll aka renaissance chambara said:
June 11, 2006 12:33 PM
It depends, I am not a big enough sports fan personally, but I can understand the appeal.
When I used to work in an oil refinery, we had a huge bill from calls to the UK equivalent to a 900 number. We called the number and it turned out to be a live cricket reportage. We got a radio that covered long wave transmissions for the finance director and the calls stopped.
In order for sport to work on a mobile device the content needs to be adapted for that format, think about how hard it is to follow many ball sports like tennis, cricket, baseball or an ice hocky puck. If the media adapts to these limitations we could see a new golden age of sports reporting not seen since the golden days of radio.
bob said:
June 17, 2006 9:22 PM
What cell phone??
Subscribe to comments for this entry.