Because the established powers in the media industry have a history of setting the news agenda, it has taken a lot of urging and cajoling for them to start giving more power and control to their audience. And now we're starting to see the flowering of experimentation on many big news sites, from the FirstPerson citizen media effort at MSNBC.com to the recent redesign of USAToday.com with reader comments and recommendations for each story. But in perusing all the feedback to that redesign, many complaints have already cropped up. "I tune in to sites like this to find out what informed journalists and editors think is important in the world today, not what Woody1 has to say about Ann Coulter," says one anonymous commenter. "I don't think the public interest is well served by this bottoms-up approach to journalism...Reader comments have a place on this site, but it should not be on the front page." How far do you think major news sites should go with reader participation? Should comments be played up more or downplayed? Should all big news sites have forums for readers? Share your thoughts in the comments below and I'll run the best ones in the next Your Take Roundup.
How much audience participation is right for a news site?
by Mark Glaser, March 5, 2007
Post a Comment
Multimedia
Best of MediaShift
By This Author
-
@FakeAPStylebook Editors Explain Their Overnight Success on Twitter
For anyone who has suffered through reading the entire AP Stylebook for a journalism class, there's a cathartic release when reading the dry wit of the @FakeAPStylebook feed on Twitter. It combines parody of the journalism usage bible with funny repartee and the absurd. That mix has brought amazing success to the people behind the feed: more than 40,000 followers...
-
Harold Evans Sees Bright Future for Print-on-Demand Newspapers
Evans is the editor-at-large for The Week magazine. He has written numerous books, but his most recent is called "My Paper Chase," a fascinating memoir covering his early years as a cub reporter, copy editor and eventually editor and publisher over decades of distinguished work. He connects what happened in those early years to the changes wrought by technology and the Internet, and what he sees as he watches his wife, Tina Brown, co-found and manage The Daily Beast.
-
4 Minute Roundup: Twitter's Real-Time Search Deals; Bloomberg Rising
Here's the latest 4MR audio report from MediaShift. In this week's edition, I look at the deals Microsoft made recently with Twitter and Facebook to incorporate tweets and status updates into its Bing search engine. Google quickly announced a deal with Twitter too, but why should we care? Also, Bloomberg bought out BusinessWeek magazine, but the jewel might well be...
Stay Informed
-
E-mail List 
News Feed »
Follow us on Twitter »
Who We Are
MediaShift tracks how new media -- from weblogs to podcasts to citizen journalism -- are changing society and culture.
Reader Poll
3 comments so far, Add Yours
Todd Zeigler said:
March 5, 2007 6:25 PM
I think there is a sweet spot between sites like Digg and Newsvine and your traditional newspaper website that no one has really hit yet. USA Today deserves credit for trying to reach that sweet spot.
I think the new USA Today potentially has the right mix of features but has been undone a bit by the site's design and architecture. It suffers from the "swap meet" approach that so many newspaper sites employ. I look at the site and my eye doesn't know where to go. It just seems messy, which is understandable given the scope of the site.
With time and some tweaks to the site's design, I think this new site will serve its users well. I like the features but just wish it was pulled together a little better.
gzino said:
March 5, 2007 7:51 PM
Readers have to be empowered to be active participants if they so choose. A dialogue is superior to a monologue, and now technology enables it at the largest scales. The challenge is site design and usability - can't turn off the readers that just want to passively consume...still the largest group for any media outlet. Certainly this can be done although USA Today didn't do a great job of it. USA Today also has very broad, shallow, objective, emphemeral content...hard to build engaged, passionate communities around that type of content, even if you put the right tools in the people's hands.
shruthi said:
February 17, 2008 7:04 AM
Do you think the news media has changed over time. By change I mean, how interactive has it become with the audience. Is this a growing trend, is it here to stay?
Subscribe to comments for this entry.