Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

Your Take »

How should the military respond to citizen journalism in the field of combat?

Ever since the advent of U.S. military personnel blogging about their experiences in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, the military brass has been in a conundrum. Do they allow these eye-opening first-person accounts from the front lines, or do they try to rein them in to keep control over the storylines of the Iraq War? Not only are milblogs providing first-person text accounts of war, but there are also photos and video streaming in from the front lines as never before. (See this MediaShift guide to soldier videos from Iraq.)

I recently received a question on this topic from Chris Eder, a broadcast journalist for the Air Force who blogs at AFNBroadcaster. "The Air Force's #1 weakness is telling a timely story, and its #1 strength is telling an accurate story," Eder said. "Citizen journalism's #1 strength is telling a timely story. Given these restraints, how do you think the Air Force could best leverage all of these voices to tell one message?" Good question and one I will put to you, dear MediaShift readers. How should the Air Force and the rest of the U.S. military deal with citizen journalism among soldiers? Should they just filter posts that could give away strategy or soldier locations? Is it something they should embrace, and how? Share your thoughts in the comments below and I'll run the best ones in the next Your Take Roundup and send them to Eder.

2 comments so far, Add Yours

 

First of all I wouldn't be a good journalist if I didn't correct the message. The AF's #1 weakness quote is my opinion, not AF fact. I crafted that statement as a catalyst to justify citizen journalism in the AF.

Dear MediaShift Reader-
I look forward to your ideas!

 

Heh. Nice application of Rule No. 8.

I don't really think the Air Force should be trying to "leverage" their airmen's messages. As soon as Big AF started to appear to grant semi-official status to a milblogger, I think that blogger would lose some credibility and independence.

I think the best thing the AF can do is to stay out of our way so long as we don't compromise OPSEC or run afoul of the UCMJ.

Post a Comment

Ground rules for posting comments: No profanity or personal attacks. Please comment on the subject of the blog post itself. If you do not follow these rules, we will remove your post. Keep it civil, folks!

By This Author

  • Gannett Pushes for More Tech Hires, Data Centers, Niche Sites

    These are dark days for newspaper companies in the U.S. There are layoffs in print newsrooms, classified ad revenues are dwindling, and readership is shrinking. To combat these trends, Gannett introduced a bold initiative in 2006 to remake its 85 daily newspaper newsrooms into "Information Centers," making the web the primary platform for 24-hour news, with more video, databases, maps...

  • Welcome to the Redesigned, Revamped MediaShift

    After months of planning and hard work behind the scenes, we are proud to launch a new revamped MediaShift website -- call it MediaShift 2.0. The basic idea was to transform the one-person blog into an online magazine with more writers, more content and more input from you. In a survey of MediaShift readers, you told us clearly that you'd...

  • Political Fact-Check Sites Proliferate, But Can They Break Through the Muck?

    As the U.S. elections near the finish line, the presidential campaigns are throwing around enough verbal attacks and inflammatory advertising to make the average voter's head spin. Fortunately, there are now three excellent sources for fact-checking political discourse online: Annenberg Public Policy Center's FactCheck.org, the St. Petersburg Times and Congressional Quarterly's PolitiFact and the Washington Post's Fact Checker blog....

Stay Informed

Who We Are

MediaShift tracks how new media -- from weblogs to podcasts to citizen journalism -- are changing society and culture.