


Return to the BOBs
7 Lessons Learned While Judging World-Changing Blogs
I spent the past week in freezing wet Berlin, helping judge the Best of the Blogs awards once again, an international competition run by the German public media outlet, Deutsche Welle (DW). There were some surprising winners, some heated arguments among the judges flown in from around the world, but overall a good set of winners who rose above the millions of existing blogs.
One big question is how the winners are actually chosen. There is an open nominating process where anyone can go online to nominate a blog, as long as it is in one of the 10 languages covered (English, German, Spanish, Russian, Portuguese, Dutch, Persian, French, Arabic, Chinese). Then the judges and DW narrow down the field to 10 finalists in the 10 language categories as well as Best Weblog overall, Best Podcast, Best Videoblog, Blogwurst (for wacky blog) and Reporters Without Borders Award (for freedom of speech).
Then the various judges come together in Berlin to vote on overall winners in each category. Separately, the public gets to vote on their own winners, though they don’t get the glory or prizes that the jury awards bring. After all the voting, there was an awards ceremony in Berlin’s swanky Museum für Kommunikation.
Similar to last year’s judging, there were some interesting international dynamics at play when you bring people together from so many cultures to make difficult decisions. Rather than hash out every detail behind the scenes, I’ve compiled a list here of the lessons I learned at this year’s BOBs:
1. The Cold War dynamic lives on. The Iron Curtain might have fallen right in Berlin, but that doesn’t mean old rivalries have ended. When judging between blogs from various languages, an interesting interplay happened, especially with the Best Weblog overall award (kind of the grand prize). As Chinese judge Michael Anti told me during a break, “it seems like the Russians take one side, the Americans take another side, and everyone else tries to pick sides.”
That was evident most in the Russian support for the eloquent black-and-white photoblog from Belarus, Foto-Mania, which eventually won out over the American entry, TechPresident, a cross-partisan group blog covering the way technology is being used by presidential candidates. On one side is a 23-year-old journalist showing the stark reality of life in a sometimes crumbling Minsk, while on the other is a group of political advisors rating campaign websites. Both I think are noteworthy, world-changing blogs, and the final decision in favor of Foto-Mania was razor-thin.
Perhaps one of the most important factors that helped the Russian bloc was its leader, Anton Nossik, a popular blogger who eloquently described each blog nominated. While Nossik was able to win favor among various judges, he was also engaged in text-messaging people while on stage during the awards ceremony — an embarrassing faux pas. [UPDATE: In comments below, Nossik says he was not text-messaging people but actually live-blogging the awards on stage.]
2. America remains influential despite anti-American sentiments. I was joking with fellow American judge Andrew Baron that we might need to wear those apology T-shirts saying that we hadn’t voted for President Bush. While an American blog from Sunlight Foundation won Best Weblog overall last year, it seemed doubtful the U.S. could pull off the trick again this year. But there was still a thread of American influence, whether is was a Persian videoblog about Iranians living in Los Angeles or a Dutch version of Huffington Post. Plus, there were two finalists — one in Persian and one in Portuguese — that were written by people living in Washington, DC.
Politically, people in other countries might not be fond of the U.S., but they still like to emulate and discuss our culture.
3. A universal message counts. There are a few difficulties in trying to judge blogs in 10 different languages. Most judges couldn’t understand the blogs in other languages so had to depend on other judges to explain what they said. There was also the apples-to-oranges decisions among blogs that might be driven by a single personality, might be showing off design, or helping to raise money for a cause. How to decide among them?
What I noticed was that winning blogs often had a universal message that could transcend language and culture. Foto-Mania spoke with pictures. Alive in Baghdad showed life in Iraq via video shot by locals. Valour-IT helped raise money to give laptops with voice-recognition software to wounded American soldiers. These are blogs that are changing the world by showing us something different, crossing boundaries and setting an example for others to follow. The language barrier just didn’t matter in those cases.
4. You can lead by example when it comes to freedom of speech. When I nominated the English-language blog by Jotman for the Reporters Without Borders award, I wondered whether it would have a chance. It is written by an anonymous Westerner who lives in Bangkok, Thailand, who has written first-hand accounts of the Thai coup in 2006 and the Burmese protests and crackdown in 2007. But I figured he was not someone who had to worry about freedom of speech, as he was not Burmese nor Thai, and he probably didn’t grow up under a dictatorship that was censoring the media.
I further figured that a Chinese or Persian blogger would probably do better to get this award as they were under political pressure and could face jail time just for writing on their blog. But I figured wrong. Jotman ended up winning the award because he was setting an example for others who might find themselves in a dangerous situation, with a government cutting off Internet access, media access, and even cell phone access in order to hide atrocities.
Jotman used the tools of a citizen journalist — a camera, videocamera, blog and street smarts — to find Burmese monks who were hiding out in safe houses. He asked people to send in first-hand reports, and filed his own. Reporters Without Borders felt that this award might lead others to do the same thing, emulating Jotman’s pluck in such difficult circumstances.
5. The world (outside the U.S.) cares about the BOBs. How much do they care? Last year, a Russian blogger exhorted his readers to go online and vote as much as possible to help a Russian nominee best a Brazilian blog as retribution for a World Cup soccer loss. This year, hackers broke into the online voting to try to tilt the competition. Yet most Americans — and even American bloggers — have no idea what the BOBs are, and English-language blogs received the second-lowest blog nominations out of all the languages represented.
The leading languages nominated were blogs in Portuguese and Spanish, and the online voting reflected that weighting. For Best Weblog overall, a popular Portuguese blog, Blog do Tas led the voting, followed by a Spanish blog, La Carcel de Papel — neither of which garnered much support from the judges. Meanwhile, English-language blogs received a sparse number of votes online, with Adam Curry’s Daily Source Code podcast garnering a tiny 2% of that vote.
6. The awards ceremony needed more focus on the winning blogs themselves. The ceremony was nice, and helped spread the word locally in Berlin about the world-changing blogs. But this year, in the name of brevity, they simply had us read the titles of the winning blogs for each language, rather than explain what the blogs were about. I thought this did the blogs — and the audience — a disservice because you can’t always tell what a blog is about just by its title alone.

The “forum discussion” part of the ceremony touched briefly on some of the winning blogs, but could have gone further and included the audience more. Blogs are supposed to be about conversation, so it would have been nice to have heard from the audience.
7. People in Berlin seem less enraptured by technology. Outside of the judging and ceremony, I noticed the laid-back nature of people in Berlin. On a workday morning, people were going to work dressed in blue jeans and casual jackets, instead of the monkey suits I’m used to seeing in European and U.S. urban areas. Plus, while cell phones were around, most people refrained from using them in inappropriate public situations, in my experience. Rather than seeing 70% of the people walking down the street using cell phones, as seems normal in San Francisco or perhaps London, only about 10% were using them. That’s refreshing.
What do you think about the BOBs award winners? Are they all deserving, or do you have your own favorites that were left out? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Top and bottom photos by Gaga Nielsen; middle photos by Mark Glaser.
Filed under Weblogs, World View
Permanent Link to This Post





Actually, I was blogging results as they happened to be announced. The device in my hand was not an iPhone, but rather an iPod Touch, using local WiFi. :)
In Russia you can see it in almost every Internet conference: folks sitting at the speakers' table onstage blog the event in realtime (including photos of the audience), and listeners are commenting them, also in realtime.
By Anton Nossik 12:00PM on 21 Nov 07
I hope you will check out our new website: http://www.ayearatthewhel.com
We are trying to find answers about Americans.
By amy bugbee 1:11PM on 21 Nov 07
I just LOVE the picture you took of Gilles!
(Caption should read: "And I will NOT answer any questions!" - I've been quoting him ever since.)
By kaltmamsell 1:07AM on 28 Nov 07
This is a great overview and analysis of The Bobs. Nice behind the scenes (and on stage) observations :-)
I enjoyed meeting all of people..
By Ahmad Humeid 10:43AM on 04 Dec 07