With more reporters having blogs, we get to know more about their personal lives and feelings. But in the push for online transparency, should we also know how they cast their vote in elections and whether they are a Democrat, Republican or Independent? Time magazine's James Poniewozik argues that the time is right for full disclosure by reporters, even if they all end up being Democrats who voted for Obama (guilty as charged). "Opinion is not itself dangerous," he writes. "Hidden opinion is, as is journalism slanted to reflect it." Do you think reporters and editors should reveal their political votes and biases, as Slate has done in the past? Or should these votes remain private? How far should journalists go with transparency online? Share your thoughts in the comments below and I'll run the best ones in a future Your Take Roundup.
Should journalists reveal their votes and political leaning?
by Mark Glaser, March 17, 2008
Post a Comment
Multimedia
Best of MediaShift
By This Author
-
@FakeAPStylebook Editors Explain Their Overnight Success on Twitter
For anyone who has suffered through reading the entire AP Stylebook for a journalism class, there's a cathartic release when reading the dry wit of the @FakeAPStylebook feed on Twitter. It combines parody of the journalism usage bible with funny repartee and the absurd. That mix has brought amazing success to the people behind the feed: more than 40,000 followers...
-
Harold Evans Sees Bright Future for Print-on-Demand Newspapers
Evans is the editor-at-large for The Week magazine. He has written numerous books, but his most recent is called "My Paper Chase," a fascinating memoir covering his early years as a cub reporter, copy editor and eventually editor and publisher over decades of distinguished work. He connects what happened in those early years to the changes wrought by technology and the Internet, and what he sees as he watches his wife, Tina Brown, co-found and manage The Daily Beast.
-
4 Minute Roundup: Twitter's Real-Time Search Deals; Bloomberg Rising
Here's the latest 4MR audio report from MediaShift. In this week's edition, I look at the deals Microsoft made recently with Twitter and Facebook to incorporate tweets and status updates into its Bing search engine. Google quickly announced a deal with Twitter too, but why should we care? Also, Bloomberg bought out BusinessWeek magazine, but the jewel might well be...
Stay Informed
-
E-mail List 
News Feed »
Follow us on Twitter »
Who We Are
MediaShift tracks how new media -- from weblogs to podcasts to citizen journalism -- are changing society and culture.
Reader Poll
5 comments so far, Add Yours
john griffin said:
March 19, 2008 9:21 AM
what's to stop a reporter from saying he is voting for one candidate and then turning around and voting for someone else when they are behind the curtain?
i find this proposal hard to police all the way around. i think a professional reporter has a job to report the facts and that should be his main goal and work to take their emotions out of the debate as much as they can. i think that is a big problem with 24/7 news outlets now bc there is too much personal opinion injected into the debate instead of the facts. i guess people could be bored by them ;-)
Nigel Barlow said:
March 20, 2008 4:57 AM
With most journalists blogging,it is rather difficult to conceal one's political views.
Whether this is a good thing or not? Probalby not if you take the position that journalism should be impartial until you get to the comment pages.
But it is difficult for journalists to totally lose their in built bias anyway.
kob said:
March 25, 2008 7:58 AM
my major political leaning is regret.
Ina said:
April 7, 2008 9:39 AM
Seriously, I can guess a journalist's political leanings anyway from his or her work. I would actually rather have full disclosure than strong political convictions masked as objectivity. The very very best journalists transcend their personal leanings and present a balanced view, but that breed is rare and I expect it to become extinct sometime soon. Journalistic objectivity is a myth. And I'd rather see the person behind those articles and grasp their full background and politics via a blog.
Ged Carroll said:
April 9, 2008 3:35 PM
This boils down to trust. If I trust a journalist it doesn't matter what they do in their personal life (so long as its legal).
If I don't trust them, why would believe what they said about their voting.
Finally journalists are entitled to the same rights as everyone else in society to deciding whether they want to disclose their vote or take advantage of ballot box secrecy.
Subscribe to comments for this entry.