With the daily drumbeat of cutbacks at newspaper companies, there is less room for investigative reporters who can take weeks or months to do one in-depth report. If their future isn't secure at mainstream media outlets, then where will investigative reports come from? TV news? Non-profits like the Center for Public Integrity or ProPublica? Online-only outfits like TalkingPointsMemo or The Smoking Gun? Do you think investigative journalism will survive in the digital age or not? If you think it has a future, how do you see it being financially supported? Share your thoughts in the comments below and I'll run the best ones in the next Your Take Roundup.
How will investigative journalism survive in the digital age?
by Mark Glaser, April 25, 2008
Post a Comment
Best of MediaShift
By This Author
-
Should Newspapers Create Consortium for E-Readers?
COLUMBIA, MO -- I am attending a half-day symposium here at the Reynolds Journalism Institute at the University of Missouri's journalism school, this time a meeting of the "Digital Publishing Alliance," a group of newspapers and tech folks who are looking at how newspaper content might work on various e-readers like the Amazon Kindle. The timing of the meeting is...
-
Live-Blogging RJI Symposium on New Tools, New Business Models
COLUMBIA, MO -- I am at the new Reynolds Journalism Institute building on the campus of the University of Missouri, my alma mater. It's interesting to be in a new building looking out on a campus that is so familiar and so different now. The mission of the RJI is to "develop and test ways to improve journalism through...
-
4 Minute Roundup: Swine Flu Online; Disney Joins Hulu
Here's the latest 4MR audio report from MediaShift. This week I look at the positive -- and negative -- way the Internet, blogs and Twitter have spread information about the swine flu. There are great resources, maps and tracking sites, but it's easy to get in a panic as well. Also, Disney joined up in the video site Hulu, putting...
Stay Informed
-
E-mail List 
News Feed »
Follow us on Twitter »
Who We Are
MediaShift tracks how new media -- from weblogs to podcasts to citizen journalism -- are changing society and culture.
Reader Poll
5 comments so far, Add Yours
joe said:
April 26, 2008 6:18 AM
Yes, it will survive, and it will be better, as long as corporations don't buy up all the good websites.
As for the financial model, three ways: 1) non-profits 2) privately-held companies 3) selling the online behavior of a site's readers to advertisers. The third option should raise serious questions about privacy, but I think there's a way to protect consumer privacy and still monetize online news. I don't mind it if TPM sells some of my clicking habits to advertisers if in return I get to read TPM for free.
I also think investigative reporting in magazines will continue to thrive. People will still pay for mag subscriptions.
Eric Umansky said:
April 26, 2008 11:26 AM
As one of the journalists at ProPublica (and one who's going to be helping oversee the Web site), I think investigative journalism will not only survive "in the digital age" but it actually has the potential to prosper.
It will no doubt look different from the kind of investigation journalism we've grown used to. (I suspect that 10,000-word pieces aren't exactly the way forward. And indeed we're focusing on new ways of presenting reporting.) But what investigative journalism does--uncover new information--is something that I think is *gaining* in value in the digital age. That's because as the daily news turns increasingly into a commodity--where everybody knows and has access to the basic the outlines of events soon after they happen--the potential value added by news organizations falls largely into two areas: 1) offering a fresh view or perspective on the news 2) giving readers/viewers information they didn't already have.
That's what investigative journalism does, it uncovers things. And that's what we hope to be doing at ProPublica as well. Shining a light in previously unexplored domains.
Doug Fabens said:
April 27, 2008 11:46 AM
NOT necessary to post this... just wanted to contribute that a type of 'investigative journalism' - local video investigative reporter confronts someone with his camera/videographer and asks double-bind questions for his viewers' entertainment - is still alive and financially highly rewarding. (It bothers me when PBS investigative reports resemble that model... )... But, can online investigative reporting compete - either or both as a matter of meaningful content, or reward for reporters getting the story that's really there vs. the story that sells best? Again, feel free to decline to post this if it's not a point you want to address.
Kevin OKeefe said:
April 27, 2008 2:26 PM
Yes, it will survive and possibly for the better. Empowering people who have the info in their hands to share it online themselves or with people who are already covering the subject online in greater depth than the main stream media can lead to a lot of info coming to the forefront - info and facts that may not have been uncovered by historical investigative journalism.
It is a great question though Mark. I shared my thoughts in depth as it pertained to lawyers doing investigative journalism through blogs. How's it financially supported? Passion and an enhanced reputation. You can read more here: http://tinyurl.com/5qg79h
Dan Yurman said:
April 27, 2008 8:20 PM
Digital age or not the issue of survival of investigative journalism will depend on the training prospective practioners get in college and on the job. The typical path of taking a fresh out of school reporter and putting them on the night crime beat may sound like something out of a novel, but it won't necessarily teach the reporter about economics, politics, technology, or power and its misuse.
Subscribe to comments for this entry.