Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

Weblogs »

Econ Bloggers Gain Clout in Financial Crisis

Late last month Dean Starkman, a writer for the Columbia Journalism Review, penned a scathing piece titled "Ouryay Eatbay Just Ewblay Upyay." The essay is addressed to members of the mainstream business press and proclaims dramatically in the opening paragraphs that their beat "just blew up." Starkman wags his finger at economic reporters, chastising the business beat as a group for failing to warn us of the coming crisis before the rug was pulled out from under our feet.

"From a journalistic standpoint, what we are experiencing today is the equivalent of the city hall reporter arriving for work one day to find the mayor and city council being led out in handcuffs," he wrote. "If the business press were, say, a nuclear industry reporter, this is having most of the reactors on your beat melting down to China. What to tell the boss?"

As mainstream reporters have struggled to cover the crisis, a group of bloggers focused on the economy has risen to prominence over the last few years, diving in-depth into complex economic issues in a way unseen in the sound-bite-driven mainstream media. In recent months, many of these econ bloggers have seen their web traffic double as people scramble to understand the crisis and how the government, with its monolithic bailout legislation, is going to fix it.

Mark Thoma, an economics professor at the University of Oregon, experienced similar frustrations with the business coverage after the 2004 presidential election. Specifically, he was dissatisfied with much of the rhetoric from the pundits opining on government economic policy.

"It was probably two issues in particular," he told me in a phone interview recently. "There was the whole 'tax cuts increase revenue' idea that I think a lot of people were getting fooled by, and also I was a little disappointed with a lot of the discussions on Social Security and how it would affect solvency and those sorts of issues."

It was in the midst of this frustration when he launched Economist's View, a site that now sits among the most influential of econ blogs. Over the last few weeks, Thoma's web traffic has risen from 10,000 readers a day to between 15,000 and 20,000. And like other econ bloggers I spoke to for this article, he said that many of those who visit his site every week include business reporters, government regulators, and investors -- an indicator that influence is larger than his direct readership.

Thoma explained to me that his rise within the blogosphere hinged almost entirely on maintaining credibility, so much so that for the first few years he was almost obsessive in checking his data before publishing it.

"When I came in I did not have the credibility that someone from Berkeley or Harvard would have simply because they show up on the scene, so I was really really careful whenever I wrote anything about economics," he said. "I would stress to get it right and do some extra reading and made sure I didn't become idiot of the day on Brad Delong's blog [another influential econ blogger]. One hit like that and I was done, and people would say, 'This guy doesn't know what he's talking about.' So I was extremely careful to make sure I did it right for a couple years."

Going Beyond He-Said-She-Said

I asked Thoma to compare the coverage on the more influential econ blogs to that found in mainstream press like the Wall Street Journal or CNBC. Are the econ bloggers able to better explain and analyze the often-complex factors that have led to the current crisis?

"I'm in academics," he replied. "On the academics side, you don't ever diagnose the patient. It's all theoretical, and what I'm doing now, especially with the financial crisis, is like having a patient show up at the doctor's office and say, 'I've got these symptoms, what's wrong with me?' And the doctor sticks him. That's a completely different use of economics -- a real time analysis -- that I haven't seen before."

BillConerly.jpg

Dr. Bill Conerly, an economic consultant since 1996, told me that econ bloggers tend to go beyond the he-said-she-said level of reporting on the economy, while a reporter simply quotes a few experts with opposing views.

"You get a diversity of viewpoints, more so than you get with the press," he said. "With a typical journalist's story, you take any idea, you find one guy who says it's a good idea, one guy who says it's a crazy idea. It's just quotes that aren't terribly useful. But what I see in the blogs is one guy trying to take things in one direction, and he's pulling data to support that, and somebody else with a different viewpoint is trying to get the data to support his point. And what you get is a much richer dialog going on there. There have been times when I've thought, 'That idiot, if he'd just look at the data.' And then I start actually pulling the data, and I say, 'Well gee, I guess he's not such an idiot after all.'"

Conerly launched his econ blog, Businomics, in March 2006. Perhaps the most noticeable feature on the site is its fluent use of colorful charts; Conerly uses them to help explain the data that he discusses on the blog.

"I almost always do the charts myself," he said. "I'm a visual learner, and I like to see a picture. It's kind of the way I practice when I create a newsletter, an e-zine that goes out to my 1,600 closest friends. It's simply three pages of handwritten charts with comments on it. People love that. I do a lot of speaking, and rarely will I have a PowerPoint slide with text on it; it's almost all charts. And I'll use the charts to tell a story."

Conerly believes that econ bloggers have gained traction in recent years by personalizing their writing. Readers are more attracted to the individual voice of the blogger rather than traditional credentials like a teaching post at a prestigious university or a long list of papers published in peer-reviewed journals.

"I think those who blog have something they want to say, or maybe it's just the guys I look at," he explained. "But they tend to have a distinct point of view, and they're much more likely to comment on work that supports their point of view. You also get a sense of personality...When I go to Brad DeLong's blog, I have a good sense of how to interpret what he writes. I have certain biases that I bring to it having read his blog before."

Antagonism Toward Traditional Media

One trend I noticed while interviewing these bloggers was that nearly every one mentioned an increase in the number of interview requests from traditional news outlets. As the econ bloggers have gained credibility, journalists have started tapping into their expertise. And while most bloggers are happy to oblige, at least one rejected the notion of trading in sound bites for seeing their name appear in an article. At the popular econ site Calculated Risk, the anonymous blogger posted a long-winded attack against the credibility issues that plague journalism.

"Dear reporters, we quote your stuff periodically, giving credit both to the reporter and the publication, under 'Fair Use' terms," the blogger wrote. "We have no objection to your returning the favor. If you have an editor who will not allow that, and you think that the problem can be solved by getting one of us to drop our online personas, give you our real names, and say the same thing to you over the phone, so that you can get your editor to accept it as something other than just blogging, which everybody knows is untrustworthy rantings by anonymous nuts, you are making a faulty assumption about the relationship among us, our birthdays, and yesterday."

tyler cowen 2.JPG

Tyler Cowen, like the other econ bloggers, has seen an increase in the number of media interview requests, but perhaps even more notable is the uptick in emails from those who are less knowledgeable about economics. Cowen is an economics professor at George Mason University, and he and his colleague Alex Tabarrok launched Marginal Revolution five years ago. The blog now has over 25,000 daily readers.

"The people who are sending me emails are much more layman than I'm used to having," Cowen told me. "They're asking for very basic explanations, which wasn't the case six months ago...I respond to every email but I don't usually have answers for their questions. I'll refer them to previous coverage, or say I hope to cover it in the future, or I'll refer them to another blog."

And for some, it's not just a matter of wanting to understand the crisis, but a desire that Cowen deliver a neatly packaged answer to the whole ordeal, an up-or-down vote on one policy proposal or another. Every day he gets questions asking whether the bailout package will work, or whether it's even really needed at all.

"People always want that, and they're begging me in the comments to give them an answer," he said. "But we tend to give a more complex take on things, and that's part of why I like blogging, because you have the room to do that whereas people in the media use sound bites. But no matter what you think, it's a complicated issue and there isn't a simple answer."

Of course, not all econ bloggers exist to provide in-depth analysis of our current economic dilemma. A blog aptly called Sad Guys on Trading Floors shows just that -- a series of images of traders burying their faces in their hands, overcome with sadness at the daily market plunges.

So far, hundreds of bloggers have linked to the site. The cliche that a picture is worth a thousand words does not even begin to explain how well these photographs encompass the dire economic situation that has come about over the past year; they may become iconic images to signify what is perhaps the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.

Simon Owens is a former newspaper journalist and an associate blogger for MediaShift. He currently works as an online analyst for New Media Strategies. You can read more of his writing at his blog or contact him at simon[.]bloggasm [at] gmail.com.

7 comments so far, Add Yours

 

Arnold Kling at Econlog as been super on the crisis.

 

Don't let's forget Calculated Risk

 

I like to go to Seeking Alpha, I get all the opinions I want all in one place. I don't agree with them all, but it's so much easier than tracking down 4-5 different blogs.

 

At the time of financial crises we need to come together united and try to solve the problems which are responsible for such a hazard. We need to overcome it. It is meant to bring calm to the population and markets and display government strength and stability. As a large number of people spend their money in movies, making films, sports, nowadays even on internet many casinos offer to ">http://www.888tournaments.com“> win a chance to play in a blackjack tournament for the people interested in gambling but there people lose a large sum of money there in such stuffs which should be minimized as the world is going through a phase where a little wastage of money could be matter of remorse.

 

USA’s FAST ECONOMIC RECOVERY IN 2 STEPS

Step 1 - STOP THE BAILOUTS and FIX THE BANKS
- Solve the loan problem.
- Solve the derivative problem.
- Reassemble whole loan mortgages

The U.S. economy is shrinking fast, because businesses cannot get loans that they need to operate normally. Banks and lenders already own $ billions in bad loans, and they are afraid to make new loans. The government gave $ billions in bailout money for banks to start lending, but banks hoard the money to save themselves.

Our financial system became untrustworthy, because it mixed $ billions in bad loans in with the good loans. Now, banks do not trust any of the loans, and the entire credit market stopped working.

The U.S. economy will continue to shrink until we untangle the loans. Once the bad loans are isolated, they can be fixed one at a time. Then trust will be restored. Credit will flow, and the economy will grow.

So far, our government is spending $ trillions on bailouts and pork projects, out of ignorance and political ideology. The real solution is much less expensive than that.

The USA has fixed this problem before, and it is not hard to fix again. This is how:

A) Start with the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC), which the federal government setup to solve a Savings and Loan problem in the 1980s.

B) RTC buys up securitized mortgages and derivatives to reassemble whole mortgage loans.
1. “Securitized mortgages” are home loans that have been bundled into large groups and sold to investors. A group of about 4,000 mortgages can be “securitized” and sold just like a stock or bond. Investors like to buy groups of mortgages because they receive all the monthly house payments.
2. Some groups of securitized mortgages were subdivided into smaller pieces, called “derivatives.” However, both of the fancy names refer to mortgage loans.
3. The problem is that many bad loans (with no payments) got mixed in with good loans. That turned the all the securitized mortgages into bad investments, which are ruining our banks. It is a huge problem, and the government has to fix it, before our economy will recover.
4. Total securitized mortgage and derivative market is estimated at $1.3 Trillion by a Professor of Economics at Ohio State University. (Also see the graph from Deutsche Bank at “The Death of Securitized Mortgages” http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/death-of-securitized-mortgages.html )
5. Government should buy up securitized mortgages and derivatives at the lowest market price, which is set via a reverse auction. (Google on “reverse auction”.)
6. Squatters, who sit on their mortgage derivatives, in order to extort big $ from the rest of the system, can be forced to sell. (Law is analogous to eminent domain, or sales forced on cybersquatters that registered the domain names of well-established companies.)
7. Government pays mortgage derivative squatters at market price set by previous reverse auctions, perhaps with a penalty to the squatters.
8. Sellers give up all rights. No new law there.
9. Banks, investors, and insurers now have cash instead of questionable mortgage loans and derivatives. So, the banking system is healthy with cash to lend.
10. Credit will flow, and the economy will grow.

C) Government reassembles whole loans from securitized mortgage components and derivatives.

D) Government sorts the newly reassembled whole loans (mortgages) into groups according to risk/quality.
1. Government uses traditional mortgage experts and guidelines to sort the home loans into quality groups, for example, a high quality group would include homeowners with 20% (or more) equity in their house at today’s market price; and house payments that are 25% (or less) of homeowners monthly income.

E) Government (RTC) sells the reassembled whole loans to traditional mortgage banks.
1. This solves the problem of renegotiating home loans with homeowners. Read on.
2. Law must be changed so that reassembled whole loan mortgages cannot be securitized into derivatives, again.
3. An important purpose is to reconnect each homeowner with his lender, and vice versa.
4. It eliminates incentive for mortgage lenders to make predatory and junk loans. If the loan fails, the lender is stuck with a bad loan.
5. Government recovers much of the $1.3 Trillion purchase cost, because government auctions off the reassembled mortgages.
6. The lower quality, more risky mortgages would fetch a lower price at auction.
7. Mortgage companies, that buy the risky loans, will have more room to negotiate with the homeowners.
8. Some homeowner negotiations will not succeed. Those homeowners will move into affordable rentals. (The government does not owe everyone a free house.)
9. Other renters would like to buy those empty homes at reduced market prices.
10. If the government gets stuck with some homes, the government could profit by selling the homes when the housing market recovers.

F) Insurers like AIG may be reorganized through bankruptcy.
1. Securitized mortgage pools never made business sense, unless they were protected by various insurance schemes.
2. Those insurance schemes always were a scam.
3. Insurance only works when most of the insured assets are never hit with a disaster. That is why flood insurance does not work very well. A major flood ruins all the buildings in a large area, all at the same time. So, the insurance company goes broke, and people that bought the insurance are not protected. That is the problem with securitized mortgage insurance. In an economic downturn, the “disaster” hits all the houses at the same time. Securitized mortgage insurance was doomed to fail, and the insurance companies went broke in 2009.
4. Companies that ran the insurance scam may have to go through bankruptcy.
5. Never ending government bailouts for insurers like AIG are just throwing good money after bad. So, stop the bailouts.

This plan is inexpensive, tried and true. It leaves the banks healthy, with cash to lend. It restores trust in the credit markets, so loans will be made. It reassembles mortgage derivatives into whole loans, and restarts traditional mortgage lending. People can get loans to buy homes. Credit will flow, and the economy will grow.*


Step 2 – STOP THE PORK and START THE RECOVERY

*The economy will grow if President Obama’s massive tax, borrow, and spending plans can be stopped, before he creates another Great Depression. Presidents Hoover and Roosevelt already tried to tax, borrow and spend their way out of a recession in the 1930s. Instead, they created the Great Depression, which lasted 12 years. Straight as he goes, President Obama is doing it, again. Nevertheless, cleaning up the securitized mortgage mess is a necessary first step.

If President Obama announced Steps 1 and 2, today, the stock market would go up within hours. Investors love a real business plan, instead of a political pork plan. Millions of people will be wealthier, feel wealthier, and have more money to spend. That will jump start the economic recovery within days.

 

I'm not an economist, but I fail to understand how the govt borrowing more money is going to solve a problem whose root cause was the easy, overextension of credit that had no relation to the risk involved.

 

baselinescenario.com is the best blog

Post a Comment

Ground rules for posting comments: No profanity or personal attacks. Please comment on the subject of the blog post itself. If you do not follow these rules, we will remove your post. Keep it civil, folks!

Perhaps the most noticeable feature on Businomics is its fluent use of colorful charts; Bill Conerly uses them to help explain the data that he discusses on the blog

We tend to give a more complex take on things, and that's part of why I like blogging, because you have the room to do that whereas people in the media use sound bites." -- Tyler Cowen, economics professor and blogger

By This Author

  • Vanity Fair, New Yorker Fan Blogs Give Free PR to Conde Nast

    The Twitter user who writes under the handle Vanityfairer would not tell me her real name. She began following me in December after I mentioned the magazine Vanity Fair in a tweet, and for the next few months we exchanged replies and direct messages about the magazine's content and its writers. Though she made no claims to be associated...

  • Ohio Newspapers Share Content, But Don't Give Up Hope for AP

    For many, last week's news that the Associated Press planned to begin to crack down on news aggregators that link and quote its content wasn't news at all. Media industry publications have long been reporting on the friction between the AP and aggregators -- a series of verbal swipes made at conferences and in news articles that perhaps reached an...

  • Political Blogs' Double Whammy: Post-Election, Deep Recession

    This week several major bloggers -- most politically right-of-center -- will see the shuttering of their blog ad network. Pajamas Media, which launched in 2004 and provided advertising for conservative bloggers like Glenn Reynolds and Michelle Malkin, announced earlier this year that it would close down its display advertising for blogs in order to put more focus on its online...

Stay Informed

Who We Are

MediaShift tracks how new media -- from weblogs to podcasts to citizen journalism -- are changing society and culture.