<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/01/top-5-week-two025.html" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/atom.xml" />
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2009:/mediashift//4/tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.54-</id>
<updated>2009-11-09T05:22:59Z</updated>
<title>Comments for Top 5 Week Two</title>
<subtitle>Your guide to the digital media revolution, with host Mark Glaser.</subtitle>
<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.24-en</generator>
<entry>
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.54</id>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/01/top-5-week-two025.html" />
<link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=54" title="Top 5 Week Two" />
<published>2006-01-25T20:37:30Z</published>
<updated>2006-01-26T02:59:38Z</updated>
<title>Top 5 Week Two</title>
<summary> Deborah Howell Washington Post ombudswoman ignites firestorm Netflix downloads Mail-order DVD company plans digital downloads John Lasseter Creative genius at Pixar becomes go-to guy at Disney for animation Sex.com Domain name brings in $14 million after long saga Net-only media diet Blogger spends one month away from traditional media...</summary>
<author>
<name>Mark Glaser</name>
<uri>http://www.pbs.org/mediashift</uri>
</author>

<category term="Top 5" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/">
<![CDATA[
<ol>
<li><a href="http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/washpostblog/2006/01/deborah_howell_.html">Deborah Howell</a><br />
<span>Washington Post ombudswoman ignites <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/01/20/jmb_qa.html#more">firestorm</a> </span></li>
<li><a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117936750?categoryid=20&amp;cs=1&amp;s=h&amp;p=0">Netflix downloads</a><br />
<span>Mail-order <span class="caps">DVD </span>company plans digital downloads</span></li>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/25/business/media/25lasseter.html">John Lasseter</a><br />
<span>Creative genius at Pixar becomes go-to guy at Disney for animation</span></li>
<li><a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=15405&amp;hed=Sex+Sells%21+Sex.com+Nabs+%2414M&amp;sector=Industries&amp;subsector=InternetAndServices">Sex.com</a><br />
<span>Domain name brings in $14 million after long saga</span></li>
<li><a href="http://www.openthewindow.net/">Net-only media diet</a><br />
<span>Blogger spends one month away from traditional media</span></li>
</ol>

]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.54-comment:95</id>
<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.54" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/01/top-5-week-two025.html"/>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/01/top-5-week-two025.html#comment-95" />
<title>Comment from Ender on 2006-01-25</title>
<author>
<name>Ender</name>
<uri></uri>
</author>
<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
What are your thoughts on WashPost&apos;s cancelling comments? Would you do the same for your blog if comments get out of hand?
</content>
<published>2006-01-25T22:51:35Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.54-comment:96</id>
<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.54" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/01/top-5-week-two025.html"/>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/01/top-5-week-two025.html#comment-96" />
<title>Comment from Mark Glaser on 2006-01-25</title>
<author>
<name>Mark Glaser</name>
<uri>http://www.pbs.org/mediashift</uri>
</author>
<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift">
Good question. I&apos;m actually going to write about the whole thing, particularly about my thoughts on how we are doing comments here. Look out for a post on it tomorrow.
</content>
<published>2006-01-26T02:11:58Z</published>
</entry>

</feed> 