<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/06/sleeping-with-the-enemynbc-youtube-cross-promotion-off-to-crass-start180.html" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/atom.xml" />
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2009:/mediashift//4/tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.312-</id>
<updated>2009-11-09T05:22:08Z</updated>
<title>Comments for Sleeping With the Enemy::NBC, YouTube Cross-Promotion Off to Crass Start</title>
<subtitle>Your guide to the digital media revolution, with host Mark Glaser.</subtitle>
<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.24-en</generator>
<entry>
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.312</id>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/06/sleeping-with-the-enemynbc-youtube-cross-promotion-off-to-crass-start180.html" />
<link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=312" title="Sleeping With the Enemy::NBC, YouTube Cross-Promotion Off to Crass Start" />
<published>2006-06-29T20:52:35Z</published>
<updated>2006-06-30T17:08:27Z</updated>
<title>Sleeping With the Enemy::NBC, YouTube Cross-Promotion Off to Crass Start</title>
<summary> When I talked to my sister yesterday, she said she had been thinking of me when she saw a report on &quot;NBC Nightly News&quot; about the video-sharing service, YouTube. &quot;I thought that story might interest you, because of what you write about,&quot; she said. OK, true enough, and I had heard about the recent promotional deal between NBC Universal...</summary>
<author>
<name>Mark Glaser</name>
<uri>http://www.pbs.org/mediashift</uri>
</author>

<category term="Online Video" />

<category term="TVShift" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/">
<![CDATA[<p><img alt="NBC Universal and YouTube.JPG" img class=left src="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/files/NBC%20Universal%20and%20YouTube.JPG" width="172" height="126" />
When I talked to my sister yesterday, she said she had been thinking of me when she saw a report on "NBC Nightly News" about the video-sharing service, <a href="http://www.youtube.com">YouTube</a>.</p>

<p>"I thought that story might interest you, because of what you write about," she said. <span class="caps">OK, </span>true enough, and I had heard about <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/internet/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=189602163">the recent promotional deal</a> between <span class="caps">NBC</span> Universal and YouTube. But YouTube had reached similar promotional deals with <span class="caps">MTV2 </span>and E! Television, but my sister hadn't noticed then.</p>

<p>What was different now? <span class="caps">NBC</span> Universal has a very large platform to promote YouTube, including on its very popular nightly news show. I went to the <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619/">Nightly News video vault</a> and watched the report on YouTube (of course with the Internet Explorer browser only).</p>

<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/06/digging_deeperbloggeranchor_br.html">Anchor Brian Williams</a> looks into the camera and opens the segment like this: "If you ever find yourself with a computer and an hour to kill, have we got a website for you." In the background are the words "Must See <span class="caps">TV,</span>" a play on <span class="caps">NBC'</span>s past slogan. Is this an infomercial? What's going on here?</p>

<p>The segment itself is relatively fair, and discusses <span class="caps">NBC</span> Universal's fear and loathing of YouTube for running copyrighted content in the past. And YouTube itself is a phenomenon worthy of a segment on "The Nightly News." But the timing of the segment with the <span class="caps">NBC </span>promotional deal with YouTube -- along with the smarmy intro wording and graphics -- smacks of marketing's encroachment into the news.</p>

<p>And I'm not the only one who noticed the poor timing of the piece. Broadcasting &amp; Cable magazine's blog also took a shot at what it called <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/blog/1380000138/post/1280003728.html">Tube Touting</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><span class="caps">NBC </span>didn't take long to start hawking YouTube.com, the broadcast-yourself video clip site with which it has just struck a cross-promotion agreement. My problem is that the plug was in a <span class="caps">NBC</span> Nightly News story, albeit the last one in Wednesday night's broadcast. And it isn't even sweeps.</p></blockquote>

<blockquote><p>I'm not sure <span class="caps">NBC'</span>s disclaimer that it was teaming with the site justified what appeared to be a promotion for it masquerading as a news story, albeit an interesting one. And I'm not sure it was a sufficient explanation since it did not point out that the deal was to give each other plugs, YouTube on the site, <span class="caps">NBC </span>on air.</p></blockquote>

<p>A good point. Putting the story on "The Nightly News" was akin to going to YouTube and seeing every video highlighted on its home page from an <span class="caps">NBC </span>show. Instead, YouTube has a tasteful text link on its home page to the <span class="caps">NBC </span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/group/theoffice">promotional contest</a> for "The Office."</p>

<p>Other than that crass start to the cross-promotional deal, <span class="caps">NBC </span>should be given credit for making the deal, a change from its <a href="http://www.adrants.com/2006/03/idiot-nbc-execs-remove-youtube-content-th.php">past behavior</a> of trying to bottle up viral video from its network. Steve Hall at AdRants had the <a href="http://www.adrants.com/2006/06/nbc-gets-less-stupid-partners-with-youtub.php">perfect headline</a>: "NBC Gets Less Stupid, Partners With YouTube." </p>

<p>Perhaps this marks a turning point for Big Media companies who have been trying to stomp out the spread of their video content online. Working with -- instead of against -- grassroots sites like YouTube is in the spirit of openness and community on the Internet. And with the massive audience of video watchers and shooters on YouTube, it's a community they will fight at their peril.</p>

<p>Other coverage of the <span class="caps">NBC</span>/YouTube deal:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/27/AR2006062701750.html"><span class="caps">NBC</span> Taps Popularity Of Online Video Site</a> (Washington Post)</p>

<p><a href="http://news.com.com/NBC+strikes+deal+with+YouTube/2100-1025_3-6088617.html"><span class="caps">NBC </span>strikes deal with YouTube</a> (News.com)</p>

<p><a href="http://www.podtech.net/?p=804"><span class="caps">NBC</span>-YouTube Deal Blurs Lines Between Promotion and Content, Analyst Says</a> (PodTech podcast)</p>

<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entertainment/nbc-promoting-shows-on-youtube-183834.php"><span class="caps">NBC</span> Promoting Shows on YouTube</a> (Gizmodo blog)</p>

<p><a href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/nbc-and-youtube-to-make-buddy-comedy.html"><span class="caps">NBC </span>and YouTube to Make Buddy Comedy</a> (Idea Grove blog)</p>

<p>What do you think? Did <span class="caps">NBC </span>do the right thing by partnering with YouTube? How will the YouTube community react to the deal? Should "The Nightly News" have run its piece on YouTube? Share your comments below.</p>

<p><span class="caps">UPDATE</span>: <span class="caps">NBC</span> News spokeswoman Barbara Levin reacted to my blog post about the possible conflict of interest. "'NBC Nightly News'  regularly reports cultural trend stories regardless of whose property it is (for example: DaVinci code/Sony; World  Cup/ABC-ESPN; Polygamy-Big Love/HBO)," she said via email. "The 'Nightly' piece was in the works well before the <span class="caps">NBC </span>announcement was made."</p>

<p>That might well be true, but it's the appearance of conflict and the timing of the piece that smacks of a commercial tie-in built into editorial. If <span class="caps">NBC </span>had bought YouTube, it would be a business story. But <span class="caps">NBC </span>made a cross-promotional deal with YouTube -- specifically for on-air promotion -- so it's weird to have such a promotional story that runs on the evening news.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.312-comment:1305</id>
<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.312" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/06/sleeping-with-the-enemynbc-youtube-cross-promotion-off-to-crass-start180.html"/>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/06/sleeping-with-the-enemynbc-youtube-cross-promotion-off-to-crass-start180.html#comment-1305" />
<title>Comment from ptvGuy on 2006-06-29</title>
<author>
<name>ptvGuy</name>
<uri>http://www.ptvguy.com/</uri>
</author>
<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ptvguy.com/">
If PBS were to make a similar deal, could you imagine Jim Lehrer pulling a stunt like that.  The words in the background should have said, &quot;Must Promote TV.&quot;
</content>
<published>2006-06-29T23:14:29Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.312-comment:1328</id>
<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.312" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/06/sleeping-with-the-enemynbc-youtube-cross-promotion-off-to-crass-start180.html"/>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/06/sleeping-with-the-enemynbc-youtube-cross-promotion-off-to-crass-start180.html#comment-1328" />
<title>Comment from leonard glaser on 2006-07-02</title>
<author>
<name>leonard glaser</name>
<uri></uri>
</author>
<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
I think the partnering is a great deal for the public.  You have the reliable and well liked news media joining with YouTube to give it more credence and you have the additional readers from the net.  I never heard of YouTube but I&apos;ll check it out now.
</content>
<published>2006-07-02T16:03:09Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.312-comment:1332</id>
<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.312" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/06/sleeping-with-the-enemynbc-youtube-cross-promotion-off-to-crass-start180.html"/>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/06/sleeping-with-the-enemynbc-youtube-cross-promotion-off-to-crass-start180.html#comment-1332" />
<title>Comment from Jeff Burkett on 2006-07-03</title>
<author>
<name>Jeff Burkett</name>
<uri>http://www.medialandscaping.com</uri>
</author>
<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.medialandscaping.com">
I blogged about this on June 6 when the deal was initially announced and I still think that NBC is a bunch of knuckleheads.  The Lazy Sunday video was getting huge viewing numbers online and sparked a whole new interest in SNL.  And all of this promotion cost them zero $.  So what does NBC do?  They have their lawyers send nasty notes to YouTube to pull down the content, or else.  

As I heard Jeff Jarvis say once, this is the end of the age of litigation and the beginning of the age of monetization.  All content owners need to realize that they have lost control already, so stop fighting it!

This deal with YouTube is fine, but it reminds me of the old analogy, &quot;Why marry the cow when you get the milk for free?&quot;

See my original post here:

http://burk504.typepad.com/medialandscaping/2006/06/nbc_and_youtube.html
</content>
<published>2006-07-03T15:03:42Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.312-comment:1346</id>
<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.pbs.org,2006:/mediashift//4.312" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/06/sleeping-with-the-enemynbc-youtube-cross-promotion-off-to-crass-start180.html"/>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/06/sleeping-with-the-enemynbc-youtube-cross-promotion-off-to-crass-start180.html#comment-1346" />
<title>Comment from Poor on 2006-07-06</title>
<author>
<name>Poor</name>
<uri></uri>
</author>
<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
The apartment at Parsippany New Jersey have many problems especially the one next to the Parsippany Police Department called Intervale Gardens.  Garbage, Trash can that have no cover and generated Bugs, Flies and Mosquito can you do a report on the conditions of these apartment? 
Please also visit http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/NJ-Parsippany.html. for further info 

Landlord are collecting rent every month but provide very little main tenant service in return as they always said the poor get poorer and the rich get richer.
Thanks

</content>
<published>2006-07-06T16:58:19Z</published>
</entry>

</feed> 