<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2007/04/how-should-the-military-respond-to-citizen-journalism-in-the-field-of-combat093.html" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/atom.xml" />
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2009:/mediashift//4/tag:www.pbs.org,2007:/mediashift//4.1893-</id>
<updated>2009-11-09T05:26:13Z</updated>
<title>Comments for How should the military respond to citizen journalism in the field of combat?</title>
<subtitle>Your guide to the digital media revolution, with host Mark Glaser.</subtitle>
<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.24-en</generator>
<entry>
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2007:/mediashift//4.1893</id>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2007/04/how-should-the-military-respond-to-citizen-journalism-in-the-field-of-combat093.html" />
<link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=1893" title="How should the military respond to citizen journalism in the field of combat?" />
<published>2007-04-03T20:36:28Z</published>
<updated>2008-10-07T22:13:20Z</updated>
<title>How should the military respond to citizen journalism in the field of combat?</title>
<summary>Ever since the advent of U.S. military personnel blogging about their experiences in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, the military brass has been in a conundrum. Do they allow these eye-opening first-person accounts from the front lines, or do they try to rein them in to keep control over the storylines of the Iraq War? Not only are milblogs providing...</summary>
<author>
<name>Mark Glaser</name>
<uri>http://www.pbs.org/mediashift</uri>
</author>

<category term="Culture" />

<category term="Your Take" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/">
<![CDATA[<p>Ever since the advent of <span class="caps">U.S. </span>military personnel blogging about their experiences in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, the military brass has been in a conundrum. Do they allow these eye-opening first-person accounts from the front lines, or do they try to rein them in to keep control over the storylines of the Iraq War? Not only are milblogs providing first-person text accounts of war, but there are also photos and video streaming in from the front lines as never before. (See this <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/08/digging_deeperyour_guide_to_so.html">MediaShift guide</a> to soldier videos from Iraq.) </p>

<p>I recently received a question on this topic from Chris Eder, a broadcast journalist for the Air Force who blogs at <a href="http://afnbroadcaster.blogspot.com/2007/03/citizen-journalism-or-decline-of.html"><span class="caps">AFNB</span>roadcaster</a>.  "The Air Force's  #1 weakness is telling a timely story, and its #1 strength is telling an accurate story," Eder said. "Citizen journalism's #1 strength is telling a timely story. Given these restraints, how do you think the Air Force could best leverage all of these voices to tell one message?" Good question and one I will put to you, dear MediaShift readers. How should the Air Force and the rest of the <span class="caps">U.S. </span>military deal with citizen journalism among soldiers? Should they just filter posts that could give away strategy or soldier locations? Is it something they should embrace, and how? Share your thoughts in the comments below and I'll run the best ones in the next Your Take Roundup and send them to Eder.  </p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2007:/mediashift//4.1893-comment:9317</id>
<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.pbs.org,2007:/mediashift//4.1893" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2007/04/how-should-the-military-respond-to-citizen-journalism-in-the-field-of-combat093.html"/>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2007/04/how-should-the-military-respond-to-citizen-journalism-in-the-field-of-combat093.html#comment-9317" />
<title>Comment from Chris Eder on 2007-04-04</title>
<author>
<name>Chris Eder</name>
<uri>http://afnbroadcaster.blogspot.com/</uri>
</author>
<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://afnbroadcaster.blogspot.com/">
First of all I wouldn&apos;t be a good journalist if I didn&apos;t correct the message.  The AF&apos;s #1 weakness quote is my opinion, not AF fact.  I crafted that statement as a catalyst to justify citizen journalism in the AF.

Dear MediaShift Reader-
I look forward to your ideas!
</content>
<published>2007-04-04T09:24:16Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
<id>tag:www.pbs.org,2007:/mediashift//4.1893-comment:9475</id>
<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.pbs.org,2007:/mediashift//4.1893" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2007/04/how-should-the-military-respond-to-citizen-journalism-in-the-field-of-combat093.html"/>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2007/04/how-should-the-military-respond-to-citizen-journalism-in-the-field-of-combat093.html#comment-9475" />
<title>Comment from Yankee Sailor on 2007-04-12</title>
<author>
<name>Yankee Sailor</name>
<uri>http://www.yankeesailor.us</uri>
</author>
<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yankeesailor.us">
Heh. Nice application of Rule No. 8.

I don&apos;t really think the Air Force should be trying to &quot;leverage&quot; their airmen&apos;s messages. As soon as Big AF started to appear to grant semi-official status to a milblogger, I think that blogger would lose some credibility and independence. 

I think the best thing the AF can do is to stay out of our way so long as we don&apos;t compromise OPSEC or run afoul of the UCMJ.
</content>
<published>2007-04-13T06:53:25Z</published>
</entry>

</feed> 