At the start of the hearing, Bank of America CEO Ken Lewis was visibly nervous (ok, so who wouldn't be). He chose his words carefully. Lawmakers desperately tried to get him to say he had been "threatened," but he wasn't biting. Instead, he tried to explain the conversation he had with then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, and leave it to others to characterize.
I would sum up what Lewis said this way; Paulson told Lewis he supported Bank of America, but if he didn't go through with the deal and needed help later, he and the rest of the management would be gone. Lewis says he decided not to cancel the deal with Merrill Lynch after that conversation.
But Lewis says the threat of losing his job wasn't the reason he went ahead with the deal, saying "it was the seriousness, it was because they made it, not the threat itself." Twenty billion in taxpayer support factored into the equation, too. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Edolphus Towns (D) N.Y. says he'll get the other side of the story when Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke testify.






Comments
Bank of America stock is up 16% since last Friday's close. Bank of American has the resources to pay back its bailout loans but its offer was turned down by the Feds. Analysts said yesterday Bank of America is the best big bank bargain out there. Analysts said yesterday that Merrill played a big role in Bank of America's positive 1Q09 earnings. And analysts said yesterday that in a couple of years the Merrill acquisition will have proven to be a significant part in Bank of America's success.
So why don't these House democrats just move on and stop trying to tear down one of the few things in this economic climate that is actually fixed. Go fix GM.