|
| BURUNDI: ON THE KNIFES EDGE |
|
| March 28, 1996 |
||
![]() |
At
a crucial moment in Burundi's history, Charlayne Hunter-Gault investigates
whether an ethnic conflict similar to the one that engulfed Rwanda will
overtake the nation.
|
|
|
CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: Two years ago in Rwanda, the Hutu and Tutsi
tribes fought a vicious and bloody war that left more than 1/2 million
Tutsis dead, a massacre that shocked the world. More than 1/2 million
people, mostly Hutus, fled Rwanda into the nearby countries of Burundi,
Zaire, and Tanzania. MADELEINE ALBRIGHT, US Ambassador to the UN: (January 30) They are dealing with--the only way to describe it is the African version of the neutron bomb. The buildings there are standing, and somewhere between five to eight hundred thousand, or up to a million people were murdered, and so they are trying to deal with the horror of that kind of national trauma. |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Rwandans in Burundi. | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: The escalating violence in Burundi is threatening
to further de-stabilize an area already plagued by a severe refugee
crisis. Two hundred and fifty thousand Burundians have fled their country,
mostly to Zaire, joining the more than million and a half Rwandan refugees
already in the camps. UN and Zaire GERALDINE SICOLA, Catholic Relief Services: The people have settled. They've been there now for two years. They've engaged themselves in small ways of survival. What comes to mind, though, is that while I was there, it was announced by UNHCR that by the end of this month they would no longer have funds. CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: The United Nations High Commissioner-- CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: --for Refugees, which is sort of overseeing the refugees. MS. SICOLA: That's right. CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: And what does that mean? MS. SICOLA: Well, that means that by the end of this month people are going to have to make a choice between survival and having their basic needs met, perhaps by returning home to Rwanda, or would they stay at the threat of not being able to survive and having their basic needs met because of the fear of going back to Rwanda-- CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: And the fear is still very much alive? MS. SICOLA: The fear is still very much alive, and what is striking, or what struck me as I drove through those countries is that for, for a minute, I never forgot what happened there two years ago. I never forgot the genocide, and I realize that these people are living with that every day. And yet, somehow in Rwanda, you see people getting on with their lives and attempting to survive. CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: In the camps. CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: But the word isn't getting back to the people in the camps from the Rwandans in Rwanda that it's okay to come home? MS. SICOLA: I think that are efforts being made to convince people that, that it is all right to go home. Perhaps more has to be done to do that, for them to be convinced. But fear is, is a debilitating thing. Uh, if you've ever felt afraid of anything, yourself, you know it's very hard to move on beyond that fear. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| The
psychological aspect. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: So how much of the problem--excuse me--is psychological now, and how much of it is physical? CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: Because they won't know any different? MS. SICOLA: Exactly, yes. CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: But you also say that the women can't--I mean, can the women do this, given the kinds of new things that, that--the new tasks that they've had to take on? Tell me a little about that. MS. SICOLA: Yes, certainly because of the genocide and because of the exodus of people out of Rwanda, it seems that the ratio, the gender ratio, is--has now--has now switched. There are definitely more women and children and old people than there are young, young men. And so women are now having to take on, in addition to their already heavy work loads, they're having to take on the burden of the heavier work load that men often did. CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: Because the men are either dead-- MS. SICOLA: Exactly. MS. SICOLA: Exactly. CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: Or whatever. MS. SICOLA: That's right. CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: So that the women are having to do what? MS. SICOLA: Well, I think they're doing more of the heavy agricultural work perhaps than the men used to do. Uh, many houses were destroyed. That's going to be a critical situation as the refugees return. Women are going to have to be engaged in that kind of labor as well in rebuilding homes. And I think we have to be--to think ahead of what effect that's going to have on, on the health and development of the children as well. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Differences between Rwanda and Burundi. | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: Is the same--now, Burundi hasn't had the kind of genocide and civil strife that Rwanda had, but you went there. What is different about it? MS. SICOLA: I think the, the conflicts that we're seeing in many places in the world, in many places in Africa, certainly the situation in Bosnia, is indicating to us that our role in relief and development has to now always be done with, with a lens of looking how we contribute to peace and reconciliation with people. Uh, whether we're doing projects that improve people's economic situation or strengthening local institutions so that they're building a civil society, themselves, we have to look at that in terms of our role of peace building. But we have to look at the cleavages within society and always be trying to bring, bring people together, whether it's an economic development or social development, uh, and we're beginning to see our role in that much more clearly than I think we perhaps ever did before. CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: How do you build support for that? Because I remember when Amb. Albright was on the program, she said that, you know, that the people have to take responsibility for themselves and that the only way that there's going to be any kind of enduring peace in the future is for the people to kind of get it together. CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: Why is it? Why should Americans care? MS. SICOLA: I believe it's a moral imperative. I think it's a moral and ethical imperative, and I think it's a practical imperative. MS. SICOLA: Practical in the sense that this is an increasingly interdependent world. A problem 10,000 miles away affects us. Just the fact that I'm on this program tells us that American people do have an interest, that we are connected to people outside of our own borders. And when there is a problem somewhere else, it's going to affect us here. CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: Well, Geraldine Sicola, thank you for joining us. MS. SICOLA: Thank you very much for your interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | ||
| PBS Online Privacy Policy Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved. | ||