Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

a NewsHour with Jim Lehrer Transcript
Online NewsHour Online Focus
IMPEACHMENT POLITICS

October 4, 1998 
Washington politics have been dominated by the impeachment story. The Friday release of more documents collected by the independent counsel continued the focus on how the House of Representatives will handle the charges against the President. Following a background report, political analysts and voters in Denver weigh in on the issue.

realaudio

NewsHour Links


Oct. 4, 1998:
Election '98: The National Report

Oct. 4, 1998:
A group of voters in Denver consider the impeachment issue.

Oct. 4, 1998:
A look at two open seat contests.

Oct. 4, 1998:
How impeachment is impacting two races.

Oct. 4, 1998:
How will the budget and other issues impact Election '98?

Oct. 4, 1998:
A conversation between voters in Denver and Members of Congess.

 


NewsHour Links

The House Judiciary Committee

The House of Representatives

The United States Senate

JIM LEHRER: From the Capitol, Kwame Holman looks ahead.

 

The House prepares for hearings.

KWAME HOLMAN: When the House Judiciary Committee meets tomorrow, members are expected to spend most of the day -- and possibly part of Tuesday as well -- debating a resolution that would authorize the committee to "investigate fully and completely whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its constitutional power to impeach William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States of America." Committee Chairman Henry Hyde said he chose that language because it follows -- word for word -- the Watergate resolution of the Judiciary Committee 24 years ago. The only member of the current Judiciary Committee to have served during Watergate is the ranking Democrat John Conyers.

JOHN CONYERS: I am pleased by the Republican proposal for Watergate-like rules for operation as we move into the inquiry.

KWAME HOLMAN: But Conyers -- speaking for all Democrats on the committee -- vehemently opposes following those Watergate rules that would allow an open-ended inquiry of President Clinton with no restrictions on the issues to be investigated.

JOHN CONYERS: Well, we're talking four to six weeks or -- you know, we're talking about a reasonable period of time that we would negotiate. But we've got to put a limit on it. I mean, I'm horrified at the thought that somebody would tell me that this should just go on until -- I mean, we're in the fifth year of finding out if there are any -- if there's anything to bring, and now we're going to then go into an inquiry that would also be open-ended for, what, four or five years?

KWAME HOLMAN: Since the Starr Report was released a month ago, Republicans on the Judiciary Committee have made it a practice to respond publicly to all complaints from their Democratic colleagues.

CHARLES CANADY: Our focus is on the referral from the independent counsel. I don't know that we will look at anything else, anything beyond the matters that are addressed in that referral. But we all know that the independent counsel has other matters under investigation; he indicated that in the report that was published. There is a possibility that he will refer additional information to us. If he does that, we certainly shouldn't be foreclosed from considering that.

KWAME HOLMAN: The impeachment process began in early September with the promise of bipartisanship.

HENRY HYDE: (September 9) We're going to do our level best as much as humanly possible to work in a bipartisan fashion.

KWAME HOLMAN: But subsequent decisions to release the videotape of the president's grand jury testimony and thousands of pages of supporting material from the Starr Report have created a wide partisan chasm on the committee.

MARTIN MEEHAN: My sense all along is that the Republicans want to release as many documents as many times as they possibly can and that's still my feeling.

KWAME HOLMAN: That partisan mood may overshadow future action by the committee as it moves toward a full blown inquiry into possible impeachable offenses by the president.

JIM LEHRER: The public opinion polls are sending a variety of messages. The impeachment charges and his acknowledgement of a relationship with Monica Lewinsky have not affected President Clinton’s high job performance ratings. But his personal approval ratings have plummeted. Congress’s ratings are high, except on its handling of the impeachment issue. The polls reflect an uncertain landscape for the fall election. Margaret Warner has more on that.

MARGARET WARNER: With me are three people who are watching this election closely: Ron Brownstein, a reporter for the Los Angeles Times; and two political consultants who are advising House and Senate candidates in their respective parties, Republican Bill McInturff, and Democrat Bob Schrum.

 

Candidates play it safe.

 

Ron, how important is this election going to be to the president’s impeachment prospects?

RON BROWNSTEIN: Probably very important. So far, neither party is precisely framing the election or referendum on whether Bill Clinton should stay or go. But in large measure that’s what it may turn out to be, even though relatively few candidates are emphasizing it in their campaigns. If Republicans make big gains, they probably will be much more enthusiastic about moving forward with impeachment proceedings, and if the elections are a relative wash, I think the fact that the public is still resistant to going forward may have more weight.

MARGARET WARNER: Bill McInturff, how are Republican candidates playing this issue now?

BILL McINTURFF: Well, I think this is the balance. The public does not want this to be a partisan issue. They want us to be fair. They want us to be bipartisan. They want us to be quick. And so other than some Republican candidates who are thirty or forty points behind, who have no chance, you don’t see mainstream Republicans in a Republican close race and trying to partisan – to make this a partisan issue. I don’t think they should. I think this story sits on top of the environment and both parties are trying to react with enormous caution because the public’s telling us, we don’t want this to be a partisan issue, we want this handled fairly and in a bipartisan way.

MARGARET WARNER: All right. And Bob, how are you seeing – before we talk about what the Democrats are doing, how are you seeing what Republicans are doing?

BOB SCHRUM: Well, I think the public may want it to be quick, but I don’t think the Republicans want it to be quick. I think the Republicans see two advantages in this situation right now. One, I think they believe that especially when you look at predicted likely voters, this is going to yield them some real gains in this election. And secondly, I think the strategy, if that happens, is to come back to hold lengthy impeachment hearings and inquiries and see if they can prepare the country for the idea that the president ought to be impeached.

MARGARET WARNER: And how are Democratic candidates dealing there – with this issue in a counter way?

BOB SCHRUM: Well, they’re mostly not talking about it. I mean, Democrats are trying very hard to talk about the health care bill of rights, about saving Social Security, about the minimum wage, about education. But I think Bill’s right, there’s an overlay that comes out of Washington, not of the national news, that hangs over this election. And people obviously get asked questions: What’s your position; Do you think the president ought to be impeached; do you think he ought to resign? Most people, for example, people running for the Senate, say – and I think quite properly so -- that they may have to be a juror in a proceeding and they can’t prejudge it. I’m astounded actually that there are a few Republican Senate candidates who have gone to the point of saying, yes, I think he ought to be impeached. At some level you want to say, well, I think they can’t even be on a jury if the trial ever comes to the Senate.

RON BROWNSTEIN: You know, if you look at the candidates who are either staunchly, unequivocally defending Bill Clinton, or are calling on him to resign, they’re almost all in safe seats. People who are in the marginal seats – in the swing seats – are, as Bill and Bob said, are being very cautious, whether they’re Republicans or Democrats, because in fact, you have an electorate at this point that is critical of what Clinton has done but quite resistant to the idea of removing him before his presidency is over. So you’re seeing very little evidence of sort of a stampede among even Republicans -- Republican candidates – to say he should go.

MARGARET WARNER: Bill, go back to the issue that Bob raised about the sort of intensity factor, though, among some Republicans who do want impeachment. Turnout is historically much lower in off-year elections. Do you think this impeachment issue could affect turnout, and, if so, which way and with which voters?

     
 


The California Senate race.

 

BILL McINTURFF: Well, from August 17th, when the president gave his speech, through the first week in October, this has been a turn of events for the Republicans. It has really energized our core voters. It has really ratcheted up the number of people who want to go vote, who say they’re going to vote Republican. Now, what happened this week and what’s happening right now in the data is, as the House has moved forward, as we’ve released the video, as there will be a vote for inquiry, there’s no question that it’s also now we’re seeing some reaction from core Democrats, who are beginning to filter this through – this isn’t fair; it’s too partisan. And we’re seeing a ratchet up on the Democrats’ side. So I think what it might mean, as I’ve been saying for a year, this could be the lowest turnout in American history. It’s possible that as both sides pick a side on this impeachment thing that we might actually see a tick up in turnout. But, in general, overall, what’s still happening is most likely voters are four to six points at least more Republican than when you look at all registered voters, and the edge is, I think, generally on our side.

BOB SCHRUM: I think that’s pretty honest, actually. It’s obvious that the highest Republican hopes depend on the lowest possible voter turnout. And the release of a tape, which Democrats resisted and Republicans promoted, and is a wonderful illustration in how life has the opposite consequence of what you think it’s going to have, has created a new situation in which I think there is more awareness among Democrats and among core Democratic groups like African-American voters, that maybe it’s important to go out and vote this year. And if that happens, this equation will change again. It would defy all historical odds for that to occur, but this whole situation really doesn’t have a lot of precedence.


    REGIONS | TOPICS | RECENT PROGRAMS | ABOUT US | FEEDBACK |SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS:
POD|RSS
SEARCH
Funded, in part, by:ChevronIntelBNSF RailwayWells FargoToyotaMonsantoCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.