 |
| Originally Aired: June 5, 2006 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Global Warming Presents New Business Opportunities |
 |
 |
| As various groups push to raise awareness of the adverse effects of global warming and energy prices continue to rise, companies are advertising greener, cleaner products that may cost a little more. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

 |
       |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ANDREW CASTALDI, Swiss Re: Caribbean waters were warmer than normal, and the warmth went deeper than normal PAUL SOLMAN, NewsHour Economics Correspondent: And that's what that ridge shows? ANDREW CASTALDI: That's right. PAUL SOLMAN: Andy Castaldi heads up the Catastrophe and Perils Division at Swiss Re, one of the world's top insurance firms. This time-lapse footing of last August in the Gulf is for his clients. ANDREW CASTALDI: And hurricanes are so sensitive, even a half-degree difference above average is going to cause greater potential for more intense hurricanes. PAUL SOLMAN: Now there's Katrina forming, right over Florida. ANDREW CASTALDI: A Category 2. Then, all of a sudden, it hits the warmer waters of the Gulf, and it grew to a Category 5. PAUL SOLMAN: The storm cost insurance companies a fortune. Property losses twice those of September 11th. Warmer waters, global warming -- seems connected, but maybe it isn't. If it is, however, insurance firms could face a flood of future claims. And glaciers are melting, sea levels rising. AL GORE, former presidential candidate: This is what would happen in Florida. Around Shanghai, home to 40 million people... PAUL SOLMAN: If Al Gore's new film is right, the waters could, as in Noah's day, prevail exceedingly upon the Earth, inundate cities, bankrupt the insurance industry. AL GORE: Think of the impact of a couple hundred thousand refugees -- and then imagine a hundred million. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Andrew Castaldi
Swiss Re |
 |
 |
After every mega event, there will be some type of economic loss that has to be recovered somewhere ... Insurance is the best way for people to sustain themselves and rebuild their lives thereafter. |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
Preparing for the worst
PAUL SOLMAN: Small wonder, then, that insurance companies
are taking action.
Moreover, it's not just to protect themselves, because
global warming is also becoming a business opportunity.
ANDREW CASTALDI: After every mega event, there will be some
type of economic loss that has to be recovered somewhere.
PAUL SOLMAN: In other words, the threat of global warming is
a way to sell more insurance.
ANDREW CASTALDI: Insurance is the best way for people to
sustain themselves and rebuild their lives thereafter.
PAUL SOLMAN: So I watch your presentation, and I say,
"Hmm, I'd better buy more insurance than I'd thought, because the
likelihood that something bad is going to happen is higher than I might have
realized."
ANDREW CASTALDI: That is one way of looking at it.
PAUL SOLMAN: Another way of looking at it, that insurance is
actually a metaphor for the global warming problem as a whole.
VINOD KHOSLA, venture capitalist: I won't contend that I can
prove with 100 percent certainty, but 98 percent of the scientists, maybe more,
believe that we have a serious climate problem.
PAUL SOLMAN: Vinod Khosla is a Silicon
Valley mogul.
VINOD KHOSLA: You can't prove that your house is going to
burn down.
PAUL SOLMAN: No, I don't think my house is going to burn
down.
VINOD KHOSLA: No, you don't, but you still pay every year,
year after year, your insurance premiums to make sure, just in case. Are we
willing to take that kind of risk at the planetary level for Earth, and not buy
any insurance? |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Louis Chenevert
President, United Technologies Corp. |
 |
 |
Our technology has made environment a priority, because we believe that it makes good business sense. |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Green is good business
PAUL SOLMAN: The insurance Khosla's pushing?
Biofuels. He's betting that consumers will pay a little bit
more for greener, cleaner products.
A business a lot bigger than Khosla's, or even Swiss Re's,
is making a similar bet: United Technologies, UTC, is one of America's top 50 companies. Its
products, Pratt & Whitney jet engines, Carrier air conditioners, Otis
elevators, may emit as much as 2 percent of the world's total of greenhouse
gases.
So the company has plenty of room to make and sell cleaner
products.
LOUIS CHENEVERT, President, United Technologies: We've got
98,000 pounds of thrust basically flowing through the back of the engine. That's
the equivalent of like 200,000 horsepower.
PAUL SOLMAN: This Pratt & Whitney engine is 11 percent
more efficient than its predecessor, boasts UTC president Louis Chenevert, and
it's 11 percent less carbon.
Worldwide, that means millions of fewer tons of greenhouse
gas in the air.
The Carrier Division is also in the vanguard. Here's the
hip-hop hype of its corporate video. There's its ever greener machines.
LOUIS CHENEVERT: Carrier just came out with a new line of
product. Forty percent less energy consumption from the same level of cooling.
PAUL SOLMAN: The same goes for Otis Elevators, developed in
a Connecticut
building that's basically one tall shaft. Globally, 1.8 million Otis elevators
carry up and back...
LOUIS CHENEVERT: ... the equivalent of the world's
population every nine days.
So how do we make elevators even better? Well, we've
invented the Gen-2 elevators, which basically are smaller, lighter, much more
energy efficient.
PAUL SOLMAN: Fifty percent more efficient. And its movement
generates electricity for the building, like your car generator feeds the
battery.
LOUIS CHENEVERT: You know, our technology has made
environment a priority, because we believe that it makes good business sense.
PAUL SOLMAN: Especially good sense when fuel prices jump.
It's like this experimental Wal-Mart we visited last year.
FRANK PRELI, United Technologies Corporation: So we're using
tires that have been recycled out to the sidewalk itself.
PAUL SOLMAN: Plus signs powered entirely by solar cells, the
store heated with help of reused frying oil, cooled with recycled air, using
UTC technology.
There are even low energy lights that shoppers trigger on
and off when they walk by -- a P.R. stunt to some, it's an appeal to
environmentally conscious customers and good economics in an era of high fuel
prices.
Our tour guide put it bluntly:
FRANK PRELI: Ultimately, many of these things are cheaper. We're
buying less. We're using more. We're doing it more efficiency. We're saving
money.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Frank Preli
United Technologies Corp. |
 |
 |
Anything you make onesie-twosie, it's going to be expensive. You start talking about making millions, up to 60 million a year, our costs come down very, very dramatically. |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Driving technology forward
PAUL SOLMAN: Meanwhile, back in Connecticut...
FRANK PRELI: And this is the area where we develop and work
on fuel cells for space applications...
PAUL SOLMAN: We're not quite finished with UTC. Because the
longest term environmental bet it's made is its biggest: fuel cell technology.
Ever since the Apollo missions to the moon, UTC has been
making cells for NASA, portable power plants that chemically combine hydrogen
and oxygen into water and in the process generate electricity.
It takes more than being a member of the Blueman Group, it
turns out, to understand just how it works, but the effect is clear enough.
FRANK PRELI: By combining these fuel cells in a stack, you
can increase the voltage and the current that you can get out of them.
PAUL SOLMAN: Combine enough of them, and you can power a
hydrogen car.
FRANK PRELI: So what we've done in this vehicle is package
the fuel cell power plant under the hood, along with all of the other
electronics.
PAUL SOLMAN: UTC has spent 20 years and hundreds of millions
of dollars to develop fuel cell technology here.
FRANK PRELI: So this is -- it's kind of like a very fast
golf cart. We prefer to describe it as a very fast automobile.
PAUL SOLMAN: It'll take more R&D and mass production,
before hydrogen cars become affordable. This experimental model will set you
back a few hundred thousand dollars.
However, says Preli...
FRANK PRELI: Anything you make onesie-twosie, it's going to
be expensive. You start talking about making millions, up to 60 million a year,
our costs come down very, very dramatically. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
James Connaughton
President's Council on Environm. Quality |
 |
 |
The most powerful incentive is profits. And there's enormous investments that can be made, that not only will help us address greenhouse gases long term, but will help us reduce harmful air pollution that affects human health today. |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
An unsteady future
PAUL SOLMAN: Now, some skeptics wonder where the hydrogen is
going to come from, how safe it will be.
Others might charge that UTC isn't out to clean up the
planet for the rest of us, so much as clean up for itself -- make hay while the
sun scorches, if you will.
But then, that's the nub of the private sector approach to
global warming -- selling green -- the approach President Bush favors, says his
environment chief, Jim Connaughton.
JAMES CONNAUGHTON, Chairman, President's Council on
Environmental Quality: The most powerful incentive is profits. And there's
enormous investments that can be made, that not only will help us address
greenhouse gases long term, but will help us reduce harmful air pollution that
affects human health today, as well as address our energy security objectives.
PAUL SOLMAN: The administration thinks rising energy prices,
plus, perhaps, a subsidized nudge to promising technology, should slow
greenhouse gas emissions without regulation.
But many businesses themselves are now saying that's not
enough.
John Stowell of the utility company, Duke Energy.
JOHN STOWELL, Duke Energy: So we need to build. But
unfortunately, we're about to enter this era of massive capital investment
under a cloud of regulatory uncertainty.
The uncertainty that we face is when will there be
regulation, and what form will it take?
PAUL SOLMAN: There already is regulation elsewhere in the
world, or course -- the Kyoto protocol, a treaty that commits its signers to
cutting back carbon emissions. The U.S., however, has yet to sign it.
So states have begun to take the initiative, and more than
half of them now have climate action plans, or emissions targets.
Shell Oil's David Hone.
DAVID HONE, Shell Oil: A federal initiative along these
lines is something that would be preferable from a business standpoint to the
multiplicity of state regulations that we're starting to see.
PAUL SOLMAN: So if global warming regulation is revving up,
better to get on with it, to give big business a more accurate sense of how
high profits can go if it cuts greenhouse gasses, and how much it will cost big
business and us to insure against a potentially calamitous future.
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|