|
| TRACKING POLLUTION | |
September 7, 2004 |
|
|
Air pollution is difficult
to track and prevent because plumes of impurities that originate in
one country can drift half a world away, ultimately affecting the climate
and human health on different continents. Betty Ann Bowser looks at
global efforts to overcome geopolitical hurdles in clearing the air. |
|
JEFF LEACH: And it's giving us the relative humidity, ozone pressure and the ozone mixing ratio. BETTY ANN BOWSER: A few moments later, a NASA research plane flew overhead with three sophisticated instruments onboard to take readings. Though the technologies were different, they all focused on measuring one thing: Air pollution. According to Cameron Wake at the University of New Hampshire, air pollution contributes to some 60,000 deaths a year.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The air pollution study | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The scientists were especially interested in the chemistry of one of the newest discoveries of modern atmospheric science; that air pollution is not just a local problem. Huge plumes of bad air can be generated half a world away, and transported across oceans and between continents. Dr. Berrien Moore is a University of New Hampshire scientist.
BETTY ANN BOWSER: Atmospheric scientists want to understand the chemistry of those connections, and what impact that has on global climate change. And in order to gain that knowledge scientists have to be able to track the plumes. Daniel Jacob of Harvard University has developed a computer model to follow one pollutant, carbon monoxide.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interpreting the data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BETTY ANN BOWSER: In fact, the U.S. part of the study was done in New England because it's been described as "the tailpipe of America," where much of the pollution flows from the Midwest and Southeast, then out to sea. In order to track that kind of movement, Greg Carmichael from the University of Iowa has developed another computer model that locates the plumes, then tells the planes where to fly, and the "Ron Brown" where to go at sea.
SPOKESMAN: What we're looking at is a gas called formaldehyde, which is one of the many constituents that are important in trying to understand pollution chemistry.
FRED FEHSENFELD: The warmer colors down here indicates that the aircraft was flying at lower elevations. And it was flying through the plume of material associated with the urban centers and the industries out here. And then as the plane moved to the North, you can see the colors turning to cooler colors. And this is where it intercepted the plume of smoke that's coming from the Alaskan forest fires. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practical applications of the data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Then they compared the data to see if there were more lung problems in places where the planes also turned up more pollution. Sometimes they were able to match the data down to specific zip codes. CAMERON WAKE: We're building on previous studies, so our expectation really is that when we do have air pollution events, we're going to see a reduction in pulmonary function. So one of the things that we hope to be able to do from this study is begin to pull apart different types of fine particles, and how those different types of fine particles might be affecting human health.
Another application of the data will begin this fall, when NOAA will start doing daily air quality forecasts for New England. It won't be as accurate as weather forecasting, but it is a start. GREG CARMICHAEL: I think we're making good progress. I think over the next two to five years that we will have very, very good predictive capability. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Enabling people to act on air pollution | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BETTY ANN BOWSER: Scientists want to predict air quality because, unlike the weather, if people know air pollution is coming, they can do something about it. GREG CARMICHAEL: Let's say the news person comes on, the weather person comes on and says, "Tomorrow, here's the snapshot of what the air quality will be tomorrow. But here's what the air quality would be if 50 percent of the people decided not to drive." And so, if 50 percent of the people don't drive tomorrow, the air quality's going to get much better. BETTY ANN BOWSER: Ultimately, the data collected by ICARTT may influence public policy. Tim Bates is NOAA's chief scientist on board the "Ron Brown."
BETTY ANN BOWSER: And because atmospheric scientists now know air pollution is a global problem, they believe it will also demand global solutions. For example, Jacobs says that problems in the U.S. can never be solved unless the dramatically rising levels of pollution in Asia are also attacked.
BETTY ANN BOWSER: And atmospheric scientists say even with better science, the key to better air for everybody on the planet is cooperation between the nations. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The NewsHour Science Unit is funded by a grant from: ![]() The National Science Foundation. Reports are produced solely by the NewsHour and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. |