|
| THE O'SHAUGHNESSY DAM DEBATE | |
August 12, 2005 | |
|
Correspondent Spencer Michels reports on the battle over the 100-year-old O'Shaughnessy Dam in Northern California. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The rich history of Hetch Hetchy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The construction was considered an engineering marvel, carried out by thousands of workers, led by San Francisco's chief engineer Michael O'Shaughnessy, for whom the dam was named. O'Shaughnessy and his backers were part of the nation's progressive elite, according to California historian Kevin Starr.
For decades, Muir led a spirited battle against the dam, along with the Sierra Club, which he founded. But following the 1906 earthquake, low water pressure was blamed for the fire that wiped out San Francisco, helping convince easterners that the city needed a more reliable water system. In 1913, Congress approved the Hetch Hetchy project. Muir died the next year. The system began delivering water in 1934, and the dam created a lake containing 117 billion gallons of water when full. Superintendent Norm Rickson has worked here for more than three decades.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Environmentalists and city officials square off | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SPENCER MICHELS: Still, limited public access to Hetch Hetchy Valley, and no access to the reservoir because it might pollute the water, has bothered some people, including the Sacramento Bee's Tom Philps, who won a Pulitzer Prize this year for a series of editorials advocating the dam's removal.
SPENCER MICHELS: Really? NORM RICKSON: I mean, you know, just to grow the trees back. Trees don't grow in 40, 50 years. SPENCER MICHELS: The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission runs Hetch Hetchy. And its general manager, Susan Leal, says she was shocked by proposals to "dismantle an elegant water system," as she puts it.
SPENCER MICHELS: San Francisco gets 20 percent of its power from Hetch Hetchy, enough to run streetcars and buses and other municipal projects, and sells power at cost to nearby irrigation districts. But it's the disruption of water supplies that most bothers the city. SUSAN LEAL: You know, we're in a semi-arid state. This is California's gold. And for us to eliminate a source, probably one of the best sources of water, not only in the state but in the world, is foolhardy. SPENCER MICHELS: But the water storage and the water could be replaced, concludes a report commissioned by Environmental Defense. Using newly developed computer modeling techniques, University of California scientists investigated what the loss of O'Shaughnessy Dam would do. Graduate student Sarah Null and Professor Jay Lund did the work.
SPENCER MICHELS: Meaning? JAY LUND: Meaning if you improve the operations of the storage that you have, maybe you don't need that extra garage. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The difficulties of replacing the dam | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SPENCER MICHELS: One solution frequently mentioned is to enlarge the storage capacity of downstream reservoirs like Don Pedro, perhaps by raising its earthen dam. Costs for reconfiguring a new system are estimated at between $1 billion and $10 billion. Editorial writer Philps says it's a good tradeoff.
SPENCER MICHELS: Still, convincing city, state and federal officials, plus the public, to dismantle Hetch Hetchy is a formidable task.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | ||
| PBS Online Privacy Policy Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved. | ||