|
| NEW RELATIONSHIP | |
May 22, 2002 |
|
|
Assessing U.S.-Russia relations as Presidents Bush and Putin meet in Moscow. |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| The Russian reaction to U.S. policy | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
WOMAN ON STREET (Translated): There's too much dictating going on from America. I don't like Bush. I have serious doubts about his intellectual abilities. MAN ON STREET (Translated): It seems as though America is a country that likes to dictate its will to other countries. You have to make some decisions, taking other opinions into account. Bush is a peasant, a cowboy. Putin is much better. He speaks better, he's more educated, or at least that's my impression. MAN ON STREET (Translated): I don't like what America does. I think the Americans should pay more attention to the opinions of other nations, the United Nations especially.
SPOKESMAN: The president of the United States, and the president of the Russian Federation. SIMON MARKS: President Bush maintains the two countries are about to open a new chapter in their post-Cold War ties, a chapter that opens with the nuclear agreement the two presidents will sign Friday, setting the stage for cuts of up to two-thirds in their arsenals of deployed strategic nuclear warheads over the next ten years.
SIMON MARKS: The U.S. and Russia have also found a new accommodation over the eastward expansion of NATO. A new, NATO-Russia council will give Moscow a greater level of involvement in the decision-making processes of its former military nemesis, an agreement that codifies the expansion of the alliance to include many of Russia's former satellites in eastern Europe. But in Moscow, there is by no means unanimous agreement that the latest achievements are historic, or that a new chapter is about to begin.
ALEXEI ARBATOV, Member, Russian Duma: It's not a relationship between equals. Certainly, Americans are dominating, and Russians feel that they are not getting enough in response to what Russia has been doing since September 11. |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Modernizer and authoritarian? | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
SIMON MARKS: What Vladimir Putin has been doing since September 11 is securing US support by hitching his wagon to President Bush. The Russians say they warned of the risks of global terror even before the attacks on New York and Washington. Where President Bush speaks of an "axis of evil", the Russian leader now talks of an "arc of instability." He's provided an unprecedented degree of intelligence to the US, as well as significant advice on the dangers of fighting a military campaign in Afghanistan.
SIMON MARKS: The ambivalence of the Russian public to developments is mirrored by the ambiguous approach of their leader. On the one hand, Vladimir Putin has emerged as a modernizer, the kind of leader willing to make deals with Washington in order to secure acceptance from the western family of developed nations. But on the other hand, he stands accused by his opponents by presiding over an authoritarian crackdown here that has weakened, not strengthened, Russian democracy.
But he's also curtailed many of Russia's open-society reforms. A whole generation of pioneering young journalists who were reaching a national audience just a few months ago, are now silenced after a government offensive against the free media. Independent labor unions, political parties, human rights organizations, and academics, also say they're being harassed by a government intent on old-style control, a development in which some lawmakers here say the U.S. is now complicit.
SIMON MARKS: Vladimir Putin still enjoys tremendous approval here - over 65 percent in every opinion poll published. But with two years to go before he faces reelection, criticism of his domestic and now foreign policies is starting to grow. Analyst Lilia Shevtsova says the president finds himself caught between two worlds, between the modernizers who seek an expansion of democracy, and the hard-liners who crave Russia's former place at the superpower table. LILIA SHEVTSOVA: Putin is making probably constructive job in dismantling the superpower status of Russia, but he is not doing it in a smart way, because he's not explaining things to Russia. He should simply tell Russians what he intends to do in foreign policy arena, why Russia is behaving as a minor partner to the United States; what are the deliverables, what Russia is getting out of its integration into the West. So far, his response was very muted to these issues, and without national consensus, I don't think that the partnership between Russia and the United States will be fruitful.
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||
|
|||||
| |||||
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | |||||