|
| THE NEXT BALKAN HOTSPOT? | |
| July 14, 1999 | ||
|
|
Talks have begun over Montenegro’s uncertain future and reports that Slobodan Milosevic is sending additional troops there. Ian Williams of Independent Television News reports on the tiny republic's efforts to protect itself from Milosevic. |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| They want to live normally | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
IAN WILLIAMS: Checkpoints have been set up by federal soldiers loyal to Milosevic. There's an estimated 15,000 troops, with reports of more arriving. Local television secretly filmed these tanks controlling a key border highway. There have been a series of tense standoffs. This one at the height of the Kosovo war a month ago was filmed from the police side, and was triggered when the military, in the distance, tried to disarm the police. They failed. And with the end of the war, suspicion of the federal army has continued to grow.
IAN WILLIAMS: Mr. Timovic's radio station, the most popular in the capital, was almost closed down during the war. Military police accused it of treason. The Montenegro police gave it armed protection. Now it trumpets its pro-independence line louder than ever. Pro-Milosevic voices are largely silent. The moves towards independence here are more practical than nationalistic.
IAN WILLIAMS: The government thinks it's correctly reading the mood of the people, particularly the young. At the weekend, a Serb band entertained the young, though largely subdued crowd. Lead singer Goritza's father fought with the Yugoslav army in Kosovo. He returned to Belgrade a fortnight ago a disturbed and changed man, refusing to talk about what he'd seen or done. And for her, like so many others here, ten years of conflict is enough.
IAN WILLIAMS: Montenegro has concluded that the time and mood are ripe for change, and it's gambling that the West, having backed them during the war, will continue to do so. Ian Williams, Channel Four News, in Montenegro. | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||
| Trying to buy time | ||||||||||||||||||||
| JIM LEHRER: And to Elizabeth Farnsworth. ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: On Monday, the Yugoslav army denied it was sending more troops into Montenegro, calling the report "American propaganda." Serbian and Montenegrin officials began two days of meetings today about Montenegro's future. And for more on that we turn to Daniel Serwer, a Balkan analyst at the U.S. Institute for Peace and a former special U.S. Envoy to the Bosnian Federation; Janusz Bugajski, director of East European Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies; and Laura Silber, a senior write for the Financial Times, who reported extensively from Yugoslavia for ten years. She wrote "Yugoslavia: Death of a Nation." Laura Silber, what's at stake in these talks between Montenegro and Serbian authorities in Belgrade today and tomorrow?
ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: But, Mr. Bugajski, Montenegro has real demands. It has something it's asking at these talks, right?
ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: So they're making specific economic demands. They want a separate currency, right, or a separate arrangement for their currency? JANUSZ BUGAJSKI: They want a convertible dinar or a separate currency as seen by an international currency board much like the Bulgarians have which allows for a certain degree of economic progress, plus to open up the country for foreign investment, privatization, and so on. ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: But even if this is not perhaps -- even if nobody expects this to solve anything, it could still cause big problems, right? I mean, there is something at stake here.
ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: Why? Why do you say that? I thought NATO had made it pretty clear that they would move if Milosevic moved against Montenegro. DANIEL SERWER: There's no security guarantee. There are lots of, what shall I say, efforts to get Serbia not to move against Montenegro. But I think the Montenegrins are fundamentally on their own. They're going to have to -- if they need to be defended, they're going to have to do it themselves. | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||
| Milosevic needs Montenegro | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
LAURA SILBER: Well, he needs it for a few reasons. One is Montenegro itself is not united behind Djukanovic. ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: Explain who Djukanovic is. LAURA SILBER: Djukanovic is the president of Montenegro. He's been in office for over a year. He is actually giving exactly the message that the West wants to see now. He's pro-democracy. He's pro-western. He also has minorities, Albanians and Muslims in his government, and it's setting an example that, in fact, there can be democracy in Yugoslavia. Milosevic wants him out. Milosevic does not recognize him and vice versa. So - and also he really resents that Djukanovic has a window to the outside world, what Milosevic now an indicted war criminal doesn't have. ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: And we should explain that Djukanovic opposed what Milosevic did in Kosovo, never was part of that war, and NATO pretty much spared Montenegro, although there were a couple of NATO bombings during the war, too. Okay. Mr. Bugajski, we're not talking about ethnic differences between Montenegro and Serbia. What are the differences? Just briefly, what's the background?
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Trying to establish an open society | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
DANIEL SERWER: I think it's quite clear that the Montenegrin leadership has taken a definitive turn in a democratic direction. It's trying to establish an open society with an open economy. There's no question about that. It seems to me. And that's a big threat to Milosevic. It's the same threat he faces to some degree from the Serb opposition. ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: Would you consider the president of Montenegro, Mr. Djukanovic, a leader of the opposition, not of the Serb opposition, but an opposition leader? DANIEL SERWER: I think he has only limited political appeal inside Serbia today. But Montenegro is an important symbol for the Serb opposition. And frankly, if Montenegro is able to take this definitive turn in a democratic direction, it will expose the failure of the autocracy in Serbia even more. And that's what he's Milosevic is really afraid of. Djukanovic has the problem that he can't achieve what he wants to achieve with Belgrade under the leadership that it's under at the moment. ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: In other words, he can't have the kind of free market system and democracy and those elements that he's looking for as long as Milosevic is in power? DANIEL SERWER: I think that's right. And we're all concerned with Montenegro today. I think there are legitimate reasons to be concerned. But the main game is really inside Serbia today. And Montenegro will be much better off if the regime changes in Serbia. ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: Do you want to add anything about how it fits in with the opposition?
ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: And is there -- does Milosevic still have the force to come down on him? I mean, I want to get back to this question that you raised about whether Montenegro's alone and whether NATO would step in and help, but does Milosevic still have the force to put down anything that might happen in Montenegro? With these police we saw, for example.
| ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||
| "Largely on their own" | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ELIZABETH
FARNSWORTH: Okay. Let's say that there is a move further towards democracy in
Montenegro. You don't think that there there's anything that NATO can or will
do?
ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: Do you agree with that? LAURA SILBER: I do. And I think it's also a calculation of whether President Milosevic thinks he wants to open a front in Montenegro. In the past he's thrived on conflict. And I think if he thinks it will prolong his hold over Serbia by starting a civil war in Montenegro, which obviously could also involve Serbia, there could be a civil war that would spread, I think that the United States would be very reluctant to get involved in a civil war in Montenegro, in Serbia. I think they would feel it would be too dangerous, too uncertain. And that is what worries me.
JANUSZ BUGAJSKI: But there's an alternative scenario. In other words, if the democratic opposition is not successful in dislodging Milosevic through peaceful means, the spark for democratization naturally would be through bloodshed, which is provoked in Montenegro, which as Laura said could spread to Serbia - in other words, a potential Serbian civil war would start in Montenegro. There's one other thing I'd like to add about western involvement. Quite possibly, what's needed is Dayton or a Rambouillet, some sort of international conference between Povorica and Belgrade, something to bring this into the international forum.
JANUSZ BUGAJSKI: International sponsorship, support, evident support for Montenegrin democracy, openness, integration. LAURA SILBER: But we can't do a conference with Milosevic at the helm. It has to be later on, because I think that having Milosevic decide what rights Montenegro gets is ridiculous. JANUSZ BUGAJSKI: Well, he didn't decide at Rambouillet, and I don't think he decided the kind of conference I suggested. ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: Okay. Well, thank you all very much for being with us. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | ||
| PBS Online Privacy Policy Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved. | ||