|
| CHANGING MEDICAID | |
February 25, 2003 | |
|
Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson met with the nation's governors this week to present a Bush administration proposal to overhaul Medicaid. Health correspondent Susan Dentzer reports on this far-reaching effort to reform Medicaid The NewsHour Health Unit is funded by a grant from The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. |
|
SUSAN DENTZER: Twenty-year-old Amy Pauly of Missouri has serious mental illness that has left her jobless, and she would not have health insurance if it were not for Medicaid. This joint federal and state program is the nation's single largest health insurance plan, covering 47 million people. That includes one in five of the nation's children, low-income pregnant women, many of the elderly in nursing homes, and disabled adults like Pauly. AMY PAULY: Medicaid matters to me because without it I couldn't see the specialists and doctors that I need to. I wouldn't be able to afford the medications that ease the pain that makes it bearable for me to live and function, to try to have a normal life for me. SUSAN DENTZER: But with many of the 50 states now in fiscal crisis, at least 26 states have announced plans to cut back Medicaid coverage this year.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Medicaid's current role | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
SUSAN DENTZER: Rowland says Medicaid enrollees fall into two groups, so-called "mandatory" and "optional" populations. Mandatory means that states participating in the program must cover these groups, while the rest can be enrolled at a state's option. In the mandatory column are poor children, children in foster care, poor pregnant women, and about 12 million low-income elderly and disabled people, including poor older people who are also on Medicare. Among groups in the optional column are children and parents in slightly better off, but still low-income families. And a critical optional population is disabled and elderly people in nursing homes. DIANE ROWLAND: Today Medicaid is really the only source of assistance with long-term nursing home bills. It pays for 50 percent of all the nursing home care, and covers nearly 60 percent of all nursing home residents. SUSAN DENTZER: For both its mandatory populations of Medicaid beneficiaries and the optional groups they decides to cover, states are entitled to receive matching dollars from the federal government. DIANE ROWLAND: There is no cap on the federal spending. It's an open-ended deal where the states spend the dollars they need to meet the needs of their population, and the federal government agrees to match whatever they spend by at least a one-to-one match.
DIANE ROWLAND: This proposal could really be construed as a carrot and a stick. The carrot is giving states increased flexibility and some up-front financial assistance during this fiscal crisis in exchange in return for a stick, which is a limit on future federal financing for the program. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| The president's proposal | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
SUSAN DENTZER: As Secretary Thompson explained the proposal this week to the National Governors Association, it would work something like this: Federal Medicaid payments to the states would be divided up into two pots. The first would cover acute-care needs, mostly for the mandatory populations, such as hospital care and doctors visits for low-income parents and kids. The second pot would be for long-term care, mostly for the optional populations, such as nursing home stays for the elderly or care delivered to the homebound. The federal money going into those pots would grow over time, but no longer on the same open-ended basis as before. The government would pump in billions of dollars in more money over the next seven years, in effect increasing federal contributions to the program. But it would then sharply scale back the growth of those funds thereafter. Thompson told the governors this week that the program was voluntary, and that states that wanted to stay with the current Medicaid program could do so. But states that elected to participate would have more money to allow them to devise innovative ways of covering beneficiaries. TOMMY THOMPSON: In the way of long term care we could ask you to take a look at some of the more exciting programs about keeping senior citizens in their own homes without going to institutions and give you flexibility to do that. SUSAN DENTZER: Some governors said they liked the idea of more flexibility, and of getting financial relief up front. Mark Sanford is South Carolina's Republican governor.
SUSAN DENTZER: But governors raised concerns about the longer-term funding constraints. Ed Rendell is Pennsylvania's Democratic governor.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Reaction to the White House plan | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
SUSAN DENTZER: Medicaid experts and advocates said the combination of more flexibility for states and constrained federal funding could spell huge cutbacks in the future.
SUSAN DENTZER: The administration has not yet put its plan down on paper, and some members of Congress warned this week that governors should wait to see all the details. Congressman John Dingell of Michigan is ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which will have to approve any Medicaid reforms.
SUSAN DENTZER: The governors have now agreed to appoint a task force to examine the administration's plan and to spell out principles that they think should be the basis for Medicaid reform. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | ||
| PBS Online Privacy Policy Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved. | ||