|
| Rx FOR MEDICARE | |
March 4, 2003 | |
|
The NewsHour Health Unit is funded by a grant from The Henry
J. Kaiser Family Foundation. |
|
Susan, today before the AMA, the president gave an outline of his plan redesign of Medicare. What does it look like? SUSAN DENTZER: Well, it looks about like it looked when the president first began to talk about this back around the time of the State of the Union address. Of course he's been discussing the principles of Medicare reform for the better part of two years. Around the time of the State of the Union address some details leaked about the plan. It was envisioned first of all as a proposal that would really amount to not just introduction of a drug benefit but actually a rather substantial restructuring of the entire Medicare program -- with prescription drug coverage, if you will, used as a kind of cheese to lure mice into a new version of the Medicare program.
When details of that leaked back in January and in the weeks leading up to that, many members of Congress, including Republicans, were very alarmed about the idea that people who wanted to stay in traditional old-fashioned Medicare would not have access to full blown prescription drug coverage for outpatient prescription drugs and basically blew the whistle on the president's plan. The president had to essentially take the model that was about to be wheeled into the showroom, cart it back to the production factory at the White House and add a few more bells and whistles. What he discussed today was that new version of the plan -- with one major new wrinkle attached to it, which is that for people who stayed in the traditional Medicare benefit program they would have, if they were low-income beneficiaries, they would get $600 a year to apply to prescription drugs. They would also have access, everybody, in fact, would have access to a Medicare prescription dug discount card which the White House says would entitle you to 10 to 25 percent off the cost of prescription drugs at the retail level. And you would also have some order of magnitude of protection at the very high end for catastrophic drug costs, although the White House has not yet specified what that level would be. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Adjustments to the Bush plan | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
RAY SUAREZ: So the big objection, that people who stayed in traditional Medicare would have no coverage? That's been addressed?
SUSAN DENTZER: Still the same -- $400 billion over ten years,
which suggests that the number is driven more by the need to plug into a broader
budget context than it is really meaningful related to the policies now under
discussion. In fact, most of the Congressional approaches for this would cost
many orders of magnitude more, a leading plan that almost passed the Senate last
year would cost... is priced nominally at about $600 billion over ten years would
probably cost $800 billion over ten years. So many members of Congress are talking
about a much broader approach to this, making drugs more widely available to people
on Medicare, obviously at higher cost. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| An expanded role for private insurers | ||||||||||||||||||||
| RAY SUAREZ: Does the new plan envision a more prominent role for private insurers?
The model here is the federal employees' health benefits program, which is the way members of Congress and more than 8 million federal workers and their dependents and retirees obtain health coverage now. They essentially leaf through -- it's the equivalent of leafing through a big book every year, picking from among a number of health insurance offerings by private plans, the Aetna's of the world, the Blue Crosses of the world, et cetera, and deciding which one best suits your family and picking that one with the government kicking in a substantial contribution to that plan. So that's the construct that the White House is thinking of here, and that is what they envision as the primary structural reform of Medicare. In fact, what they'd have is all of these private plans coming in to participate in offering this new enhanced Medicare as well as another version called Medicare Advantage, offering those plans, competing against each other for the prices of those plans, and in essence it is hoped holding down the cost increases of Medicare over time by virtue of that competition.
SUSAN DENTZER: That's right. One construct that the White House has suggested is that the country would be divided up into ten divisions. Health insurers would say I'm prepared to cover all of the Medicare beneficiaries within this particular collection of states. They would bid on what they would charge to cover those Medicare beneficiaries, to meet the specified benefits set out by Medicare, and the government would pay some amount of contribution based on where all the bids came in at. Individuals, if they wanted a more lavish plan than what the government is talking about, would have the freedom to pay more to get it and, in fact, might be able to make sure that they had a plan which looked very much like the traditional Medicare program does now in terms of the ability to choose among doctors and hospitals and so on.
SUSAN DENTZER: Everybody in Medicare, the eligibility of Medicare would not change at all from what is currently. You would always have the option, the White House is careful to stress this, of staying in the good, old- fashioned Medicare program. You would just have much less in the way of not only drug coverage but these other services which are increasingly important to elderly individuals. Preventive care, regular screenings, Medicare covers some of those things now like mammograms. It doesn't cover a real broad array of those things. Also as the White House is very insistent on stressing, it leaves people exposed for very high out of pocket costs and hospitalization and in other arenas. In theory that would be eliminated from this enhanced Medicare package. RAY SUAREZ: Susan Dentzer thanks a lot. SUSAN DENTZER: Thanks, Ray. | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | ||
| PBS Online Privacy Policy Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved. | ||