|
| NEWSMAKER: JOHN HOWARD | |
September 10, 2001 |
|
|
As Australian Prime Minister John Howard visits Washington, he discusses his country's trade status, East Timor and the relationship between Australia and the U.S. |
|
PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: Australia is a strong and peaceful presence in East Asia and the Pacific. Australia's a generous land, mindful of the struggles of poor nations, always helping when and where it can. Your government and your good people are an example of democracy, individual liberty, and the virtues of free trade amongst all nations.
But since that visit, members of the opposition Labor Party have warned against being drawn into an anti-Chinese alliance. Australia's major security issue is to prevent the possible collapse of its next-door neighbor, Indonesia, with its population of over 200 million people. Two years ago, when Indonesia ended its occupation of East Timor and chaos ensued, Australia took the lead in forming an international force to restore order. Australian troops still are the largest component of the UN peacekeeping force there. JOHN HOWARD: The government has left me no alternative... RAY SUAREZ: Howard's right of center Liberal Party controls parliament, and new elections may be called within weeks. Even as Australia has emphasized its role as an Asian nation and absorbed more than 800,000 ethnic Asians, immigration issues remain a flashpoint in domestic politics. The government's poll ratings have jumped since it refused to admit a cargo of more than 430 mostly Afghan refugees on a Norwegian ship off the Christmas Islands. After a week of diplomatic maneuvering, a deal was worked out for Australia to pay for the refugees to go to New Zealand and the Pacific island nation of Nauru. |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Australia and refugees | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
JOHN HOWARD: Good evening, Jim. JIM LEHRER: On this Afghan refugee situation, why did you not allow those people into Australia? JOHN HOWARD: Well, because they were illegal immigrants. We're very happy to take refugees and on a per capita basis we take more refugees than any country except Canada, but if you allow illegal immigration of that type to interrupt the refugee flow, you really are allowing those people to go ahead of others who may be assessed by the UNHCR as being more in need of refugee acceptance into Australia. JIM LEHRER: Even 430 people would have made that big a difference in a country as large as yours? JOHN HOWARD: I mean, that wouldn't have been the end of it. There are estimates of thousands of people wanting to come to Australia. And we have a very large coastline. It is an island continent. If you continually have the situation where we're seen by people smugglers as being an easy touch, the number of people wanting to come will grow rather than diminish. JIM LEHRER: What do you say to those who say there were domestic political ramifications of this, that if you had not been approaching a probable election you might have taken a different turn?
JIM LEHRER: But there is no question, is there not, that your decision was politically popular in Australia? The majority of the Australians did not want those people to come in? JOHN HOWARD: Well, whether it ultimately turns out to be politically popular or not is beside the point. We did it because we thought it was the right thing to do, and we did it against the background of having taken refugees on a very generous basis, indeed, a more generous basis, than many of the countries around the world that have presumed to criticize us for what we've done. JIM LEHRER: On your trip to Washington, this unwillingness of President Bush to start free trade negotiations immediately, that must be a great disappointment to you? JOHN HOWARD: No, I understand there are domestic political reasons here in Washington for that. I mean I'm a realist. I appreciate the domestic political challenges of fellow leaders. He's got to negotiate… JIM LEHRER: Everybody has them, in other words. JOHN HOWARD: Of course they do. I have them. George Bush has got them. You have got to be realistic in this business. And he's got to negotiate a mandate, a trade mandate from Congress, a trade promotion mandate. Right at the moment, those negotiations might be compromised by any commitment in principle, but once that issue is resolved I would hope that we'll return to the question of looking at the possibility of a free trade agreement between our two countries. I think there could be a lot in it. And I hope when the other issues are resolved, we can get back to it. |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Complementarity between countries | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
JOHN HOWARD: Well, because there's a great complementarity between Australia and the United States. We're both modern, sophisticated, highly educated, very progressive economies. Obviously there's a huge difference in size. But things like Internet usage and those types of things are almost as high in Australia as they are in the United States. On a per capita basis we're very similar. I think there is great potential. There will be a lot of hurdles particularly in the area of agriculture. We may not in the end find it worth the candle. But we've got to at least have a go and see if we can find the basis of a mutual agreement. JIM LEHRER: What would be in it for Australia? What would be the advantages of having a free trade agreement with the United States? JOHN HOWARD: Well, access to an enormous economy. JIM LEHRER: What is it that you have that you can't sell here now in an open way?
JIM LEHRER: Like what? What products? JOHN HOWARD: A whole range right across the board. But when you have a level of sophistication and technological skill, which is very similar, I think the potential is enormous. We get a lot of investment from the United States. The U.S. is our largest foreign investor. We invest quite a bit back. So I think it's a natural fit for the future. And when you have a close relationship, as we do with the Americans, it's always a mistake to sort of just sit on it and assume that it will look after itself. You've got to...like friendships, you have to keep good relationships in good repair. |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
| A fast-growing economy | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
JIM LEHRER: What is the relation...the economic relationship between Australia and the United States beyond trade? How do you....
JIM LEHRER: That's Rupert Murdoch's organization. JOHN HOWARD: Of course. So it goes both ways. JIM LEHRER: Now our economy, the U.S. economy right now is having its problems. What's the state of the Australian economy? JOHN HOWARD: Very strong at the moment. We're actually growing at a very strong clip. I think if things go as predicted, the next calendar year we could grow faster than any economy in the industrialized world. We've had solid growth of around, average around 4 percent for the last few years. We have a big budget surplus. We've seen employment growth although our unemployment rate is still higher than yours. Right at the moment the outlook in Australia economically is very strong indeed.
JOHN HOWARD: A number of reasons. One of them is we've run a very flexible exchange rate. We're able to shift a lot of our exports out of Asia to North America and Europe when the Asian downturn hit a few years ago. JIM LEHRER: You were selling things to Asia, things went bad and you went boom. JOHN HOWARD: We shifted quite a bit, not all of it but we were able to avoid the hit from Asia. And on top of that we've reformed our tax system and taken about $3.5 billion Australian a year out of the costs of our exports because we have an across-the-board value-added tax now, a goods and services tax; and that doesn't apply to exports. That's given our exporters an enormous boost. We've reformed our waterfront, which has made our export sector a lot more efficient. So a lot of those things have come together to enable us to absorb the shock of what happened in Asia. Now obviously we're watching what is happening here in America because America is the dominant economic power in the world. JIM LEHRER: So it could hurt you in the long run? JOHN HOWARD: Well, everybody can be affected, but we've done everything we can domestically to insulate ourselves against it, and the omens at the moment are very positive for Australia economically. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Australia and security | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
JIM LEHRER: All right; the security issue. You and President Bush observed the 50th anniversary of the military alliance today. How do you read security threats in your part of the world? What is it that....
JIM LEHRER: What is your view of China as a threat in your part of the world? JOHN HOWARD: Well, I think... I tend to take a positive view about the relationship with China and the relationship between China and the United States is obviously critical to stability in the whole region. Our urging is also for very constructive dialogue. I think that's the president's view too.
JOHN HOWARD: Oh, I didn't jump on him. I know Rick Armitage very well. He's a passionate devotee of the Australian-United States relationship. He was, you know, expressing the passion of his feeling. I don't think any of us envisage a situation in the near term where fighting side by side in those terms is going to occur. But, remember, in the past Australians and Americans have fought side by side. By the strength of our alliance have to avoid the necessity of it happening again. JIM LEHRER: Some people interpret that as his saying, hey, we may have to come to the aid of Taiwan against China. We want Australians there by our side and we're going to ask for it. Did you interpret it that way? JOHN HOWARD: No, I didn't interpret it that way. I just interpreted him as...it was a dramatic and rhetorical way of emphasizing what a close alliance means. And we do have a close alliance. I mean, there is no country that we're closer to in a strategic and ideological sense. JIM LEHRER: So from your point of view he was telling you what you already knew, is that right? JOHN HOWARD: He was expressing the reality that it's a very close alliance and a very close friendship. Neither he nor I, or indeed anybody, wants to do anything to provoke a conflict between China and Taiwan. It's in everybody's interest to engage China in dialogue. It's in everybody's interest to reach out consistent with defending our own values and our own system and our own position. I mean, we have a pragmatic approach to the Chinese. We're very different. We tend to focus on the things that we have in common rather than the things that divide us. JIM LEHRER: But you don't have any problems with the Chinese now, any outstanding controversy?
JIM LEHRER: You don't see them...when you sit down at your desk everyday, as a potential enemy of Australia? JOHN HOWARD: No, I don't. I don't think anybody wants to attack Australia. But we do live in a region that has the potential for local instability in a number of spots. That's a very different world in a way from what it was a few years ago. JIM LEHRER: All right. Mr. Prime Minister, thank you very much. JOHN HOWARD: Thank you. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | ||
| PBS Online Privacy Policy Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved. | ||