|
| RUUD LUBBERS | |
November 14, 2001 |
|
|
The story of refugees at the Afghan-Pakistan border, then Ruud Lubbers, UN High Commissioner for Refugees, discusses the crisis situation with Robert Mac Neil. |
|
The UN refugee agency keeps pressing the Pakistan government to open the border so more refugees can come across. The government is not going to do that, and most aid agencies now agree that it's more important to get help to people inside Afghanistan. The World Food Program says it must supply 52,000 tons of food each month to feed 6 million Afghans through the winter. The neediest areas are in the Northwest where the drought is most severe. Places which will be cut off by the snow also need urgent help.
HEATHER HIL, UN World Food Program: We're taking every precaution we can, from stockpiling fuel to bringing in the heavy equipment needed to keep these roads clear to keep the trucks moving even after the snows fall.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A relatively effective food program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
So that can be brought in much better now. So think this is a turning point for humanitarian, a very good development. Having said that, the scariest, of course, the situation in the South and East, basically where the Pashtuns live and where the Taliban has retreated to. ROBERT MAC NEIL: And where there's heavy fighting again today?
We have seen a few hundred thousand fleeing, even when the borders were closed with Pakistan, going secondary and tertiary roads. We are trying to accommodate them. And that battle, in relation to the people there in that part of Afghanistan, is certainly long. ROBERT MAC NEIL: Inside Afghanistan, how many people are now at risk, do you think, and where are they -- at risk of starvation or not having shelter in the winter? RUUD LUBBERS: Let's say this. Earlier, an estimate was made 7.5 million are in trouble. When I count down from that, I would say most of them have food, so there might be remote places of a couple of hundred thousand people who are starving. But it's certainly not the millions. Then we have the people who had to flee with the air strikes, the cities of Kandahar, Kabul, Jalalabad, that part of the country they are fleeing to the countryside and to the mountains. There I see serious trouble of people who couldn't find shelter in the villages. And so let's say there were a couple of hundred thousand in real difficulties there, with shelter questions. Now, winter is coming.
RUUD LUBBERS: Food is better at this moment, I would say. Food is better. ROBERT MAC NEIL: Does that mean more food is not needed? RUUD LUBBERS: No, it has to go on. And more recently, the last days, we have problems with the truckers, I mean mainly World Food problems; we ourselves also. There, in the eastern part of southern Iraq, one is waiting, because as you say to yourself, one has the military successes, but in the part which is still dominated by Taliban, there's, again, fighting, there's uncertainty, there's risks. And that means that the truckers who have contracts to bring in food and things are at this very moment refusing to go. And this is rather recent. I'd say, four days ago the rest were going. So this is a bit of a paradox: The success in the North created an even more uncertain situation in the East and the South. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Crisis has no borders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ROBERT MAC NEIL: Outside Afghanistan, on the countries on the borders, there are millions of refugees. What is their situation as regards food and shelter now in Iran, in Pakistan?
Here we have a problem that the government of Pakistan refuses to adjust to them, it's difficult to reach the people and assist the food when you cannot reach them. So here we have reason for concerns. Thirdly, now finally, they accept that we start to bring these people in situated camps around the border, and there we have the food available and shelter for them available, so I think we can do improvement. That's the situation in Pakistan. In Iran, we have, I guess, 100,000, let's say, at the border, on two sides at this moment just at Afghan territory and at the border itself. In Iran, there is not a big food problem at this moment, and most of the people there are living in the cities, not in isolated situations and not in refugee camps.
RUUD LUBBERS: No, I think it is a disaster anyhow. The country was already a disaster, that's one. It has devastated the whole infrastructure, agricultural, went into the drain because they have very nice systems to bring water in and irrigation, it's all demolished, that's one. Secondly, we have had so many people fleeing, fighting, there was persecution of certain tribes, like the Hazarias -- there where people came out of the war zones. I mean, it seems modest, but hundreds of thousands of people really having to flee from very difficult situations is a ground. The only thing one could say is that at least there are some positive signals that maybe there is coming a solution for Afghanistan, but it's still a very human ground. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Possible solutions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RUUD LUBBERS: I agree with that. ROBERT MAC NEIL: And what is a swift and concerted effort? I mean, there are many relief organizations, non-governmental as well as governmental organizations, pushing aid towards Afghanistan. Can you quantify their efforts and how far short they fall of what's needed?
Right now that we are talking, people, again, for the first time, are moving into the country -- to the city of Kabul, the people will go again, they'll go to Iraq, they will go to Mazar, and from there in the country side. Secondly, which is much more difficult, how can we enter the Taliban-dominated part of the country where all these difficulties are going on if the swift action is needed. It's very difficult to achieve that. So here I simply have to say the analysis is correct, it's neat, but it's still not done, and it is difficult to perceive what to do exactly. Here I would say that I make a strong plea here, once again, to the government of Pakistan and a certain extent Iran, where the southeast border with Iran is, as well, that they really accept the people... ROBERT MAC NEIL: Allow the refugees to come in. RUUD LUBBERS: Allow the refugees to come in. I'm not saying keep them back. We are not talking millions there, but maybe are talking hundred thousands. And those will now flee to the war through very difficult areas, take those risks and really people in need of assistance and protection, and we should give that. So I think the international community should assist, of course, in terms of burden sharing financially, fine, but we have to say to the governments of Pakistan and Iran, "You should not w hundred thousands of people to be in immense misery in a war- torn country where fighting is going on. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Donor fatigue | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ROBERT MAC NEIL: When you were on this program last March, you were facing a certain amount of donor fatigue from the rich countries, regarding Afghanistan. Has the war on terrorism, as it's being called in the United States, has that changed all that?
And we have another problem: Some countries divert money-- what they have promised us for other actions in Africa and so -- now to Afghanistan, because in the parliaments and in politicians and with the public at large, it's so much more attractive to say, "we are there for Afghanistan." So there is a sort of... ROBERT MAC NEIL: Money is being siphoned from other places. RUUD LUBBERS: Yeah, yeah, that's not good. ROBERT MAC NEIL: Well, Mr. Lubbers, thank you very much for joining us. RUUD LUBBERS: Thank you. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||
|
|||||
| |||||
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | |||||