Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

a NewsHour with Jim Lehrer Transcript
Online NewsHour Online Focus
STARR TESTIMONY

April 14, 1999

 


Kenneth Starr, the independent counsel who investigated the Monica Lewinsky affair and the Whitewater land deal, called for the end of the statute that authorized his work.

realaudio

NewsHour Links

Full coverage of the impeachment trial: analysis and trial documents.

The 445-page report from the Independent Counsel

March 17, 1999: Attorney General Reno's testimony about the law.

Feb. 24, 1999: Debate over the Independent Counsel law.

Feb. 10, 1999:
Analysis of the pending investigations against Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr and his office.

Feb. 1, 1999:
Can Kenneth Starr indict President Clinton while he's in office?

Dec. 3, 1998:
In light of the acquittal of former Agriculture Secretary Mike Espy on corruption charges, Jim Lehrer and guests discuss the independent counsel law.

Nov. 18, 1998:
Did Independent Council Kenneth Starr leak parts of his investigation to the press?

Nove. 9, 1998:
The High Court hears arguments regarding the Starr investigation and school vouchers.

Nov. 5, 1998:
The House Judiciary Committee prepares to hear from Independent Counsel Ken Starr.

Oct. 1, 1998:
A discussion on the methods of the Starr Investigation on President Clinton.

June 4, 1998:
The Supreme Court refused to hear from Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr.

Feb. 13, 1998:
Our presidential historians offer some historical perspectives on the role of the independent counsel
.

Browse the NewsHour's coverage of the White House, Starr Investigation, and Conversations on Clinton.

 

Outside Links

The White House

Office of Independent Counsel

KWAME HOLMAN: The Independent Counsel Statute is set to expire on June 30th. Testifying before the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee today, Kenneth Starr said the law that authorized his six-year, ongoing investigation of President Clinton doesn't work, and shouldn't be renewed.

 
Starr: act is "constitutionally dubious."

StarrKENNETH STARR, Whitewater Independent Counsel: The reason is not that criminality in government no longer exists. As Mr. Hamilton said in The Federalist, if men and women were angels, government would not be necessary. Nor is the reason that the public has grown indifferent to our tradition of holding government officials to a high standard.

Rather, the reason is this: By its very existence, the Act promises us that corruption in high places will be reliably monitored, investigated, exposed, and prosecuted, through a process fully insulated from political winds. But that is more than the act delivers and more than it can deliver under our constitutional system. The statute in sum tries to cram a fourth branch of government into our three-branch system. But invariably, this new entity lacks, in Mr. Madison's phrase, "the constitutional means to resist encroachments." The result is structurally unsound, constitutionally dubious, and, in overstating the degree of institutional independence, disingenuous.

StarrIn conclusion, I think it is fair to say that the act has been a worthwhile experiment. It has yielded significant results. The results, I believe, support this conclusion: Jurisdiction and authority over these sensitive matters ought to be returned to the Justice Department. And who will oversee them? The Congress, the press, the public.

KWAME HOLMAN: Committee members asked Starr how his position squares with his continuing his own investigation.

Sen. SpecterSEN. ARLEN SPECTER, R-PA: Let me ask you about your status to continue as independent counsel, in light of your condemnatory language of the statute you operate under.

KENNETH STARR: Well, Congress frequently passes laws, the wisdom of which individuals may question, but their duty as law officers is to live up to their legal obligations. One cannot quote Mr. Bumble in a Dickensesque fashion, and then say "I refuse to enforce or carry out those laws."

SEN. ARLEN SPECTER: If it's as bad as you say it is, maybe we ought to abrogate it now.

KENNETH STARR: Well, I'm suggesting that it not be reauthorized.

SEN. ARLEN SPECTER: That's different from abrogating it now.

starrKENNETH STARR: Oh, I think that's unwise, unless -- well, you could provide -- you could provide, and I know that there was a -

SEN. ARLEN SPECTER: If we listen to your characterization, it's abhorrent.

SEN. RICHARD DURBIN, D-IL: During the impeachment trial, someone on your staff said, "You know, I think in maybe two more years we can probably get this all wrapped up." And we know statements being made about this dogged pursuit of Susan McDougal and Webster Hubbell, until you finally get them back in jail. But I have to ask you point-blank: How can we justify continuing your authority or the authority of any independent counsel under this constitutional monstrosity of a statute, as you have described it?

KENNETH STARR: Frankly I am very proud, you may disagree, I'm sure you do, of the record that career prosecutors and cadres have amassed against very difficult odds: The conviction of a sitting governor of a sitting governor of the state, the conviction of the then-recently resigned associate attorney general of the United States, and 14 others. We found, senator, serious criminality, and the two individuals whose names you've mentioned stand as convicted felons. And one of them chose to appeal her conviction, and her conviction was unanimously affirmed a United States Court of Appeals. So there were serious crimes, serious wrongdoing. So what do we do in terms of a going-forward basis? Once the statute lapses, the independent counsel is called upon to make a professional judgment as to whether it is required that he continue certain matters. And that's a judgment that I haven't had to face yet. But presumably, I may or will have to face that on June 30th.

Sen. DurbinSEN. RICHARD DURBIN: And it is possible that Congress may intervene and decide that in its judgment, it's time for you to head off to some university, or whatever your future plans may entail.

KENNETH STARR:I tried to do that once, senator. (Laughter)

SEN. RICHARD DURBIN: I know you did.

KENNETH STARR: It didn't work out. But maybe you can do it for me, senator.

SEN. RICHARD DURBIN: Be careful what you wish for.

Independent counsel as advocate.

KWAME HOLMAN: Starr's report to the House of Representatives last year was criticized by Democrats for seeming to advocate impeachment of President Clinton for offenses stemming from the Paula Jones case.

Sen. AkakaSEN. DANIEL AKAKA, (D) HI: What did you feel the results would have been if your office had provided the House only raw evidence regarding the Jones vs. Clinton matter?

KENNETH STARR: I think, Senator-- and it's a very thoughtful question-- that it would have put an undue burden of organization on the House of Representatives, the Judiciary Committee, and the professional staff of the Judiciary Committee.

KWAME HOLMAN: Starr acknowledged his own ethics advisor, Samuel Dash, resigned in protest when Starr chose to testify in support of his referral.

KENNETH STARR: And at that point, reasonable minds are going to differ. Sam Dash then said, "The referral is fine, but your testimony, you became an advocate." And I said, "Gosh, I don't think so." I kept saying, "This is up to you all." As we say in my native Texas, it's "y'all." You know, I've given you the information, and I've given it to you coherently and in an organized fashion. But y'all decide what to do with it, including throwing it in the trash can

Right-wing conspiracy denied.

KWAME HOLMAN: Following Starr to the witness table this afternoon was the panel of three federal judges charged with appointing independent counsels, a responsibility taken away from the attorney general when the Independent Counsel Act was reauthorized in 1994.

Judge SentelleJUDGE DAVID SENTELLE, US Court of Appeals: During my tenure, the court has maintained a talent book that includes the names and brief biographies of attorneys of relevant skill, particularly in federal and white-collar crime.

KWAME HOLMAN: David Sentelle is the only member who remains from the panel that appointed Kenneth Starr as an independent counsel, who, at the time, was considered to be a partisan choice. Connecticut Democrat Joseph Lieberman asked Judge Sentelle whether his selection of Starr was at all influenced by a lunch he had with Republican Senators Lauch Faircloth and Jesse Helms, two staunch opponents of the President's, just days before the Starr appointment was announced.

Sen. LiebermanSEN. JOSEPH LIEBERMAN, D-CT: Obviously there were questions, as you know, raised about whether Senator Faircloth had spoken with you about this decision.

JUDGE DAVID SENTELLE: There may have been some discussion in one sentence of have we done it. I recall if there was or not. There was nothing unusual about that lunch, nothing improper about that lunch. And I've never done anything in my life as innocent and had as much made of it. There is no vast right-wing conspiracy out to get anybody. And if there one, we wouldn't meet in the Senate dining room. We'd do it by telephone or in secret somewhere. If we were that nefarious, we're not that dumb.

KWAME HOLMAN: With the conclusion of this final hearing, Committee Chairman Fred Thompson says he'll now sit down with members of the committee to determine whether to recommend the independent counsel statute be rewritten, or simply left to expire.

 


    REGIONS | TOPICS | RECENT PROGRAMS | ABOUT US | FEEDBACK |SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS:
POD|RSS
SEARCH
Funded, in part, by:ChevronIntelBNSF RailwayWells FargoToyotaMonsantoCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.