|
|
TERENCE SMITH: For the last month Russian journalist Andrei
Babitsky has been caught in the cross fire of the ongoing war in Chechnya.
A war correspondent for U.S.-funded Radio Liberty, Babitsky was arrested
in late January. Then in an extraordinary development captured on this
video, the Russian military allegedly turned him over to Chechen rebels
in exchange for the release of some of their own soldiers. Nothing was
heard from Babitsky until February 9, when a videotape was broadcast
on Russian Independent Television. In it, a bruised Babitsky described
his predicament in guarded tones.
ANDREI
BABITSKY (speaking through interpreter): I am relatively all right.
The only problem is time, because the circumstances are such that, unfortunately,
I can't come home right away. People who are around me are trying to
help me. The only problem is I really want to come home. I want all
this to finally end.
TERENCE SMITH: Today Babitsky suddenly surfaced, calling his wife from
neighboring Dagestan. He told her he was all right and hoped to reach
Moscow tomorrow. His alleged barter for Russian POWs came in the
midst of a media crackdown by the government of acting president and
former KGB official Vladimir Putin. Perhaps responding to international
concern, Putin recently told journalists that he would assure Babitsky's
life and freedom.
Putin has said he will not suppress freedom of expression as president,
but last week 32 Russian media organizations published a special edition
criticizing the Kremlin for the Babitsky incident and other restrictions
on media coverage in Chechnya. The paper asserted that the Russian media
are experiencing open and regular suppression.
JIM LEHRER: Yesterday before Babitsky's phone call to his wife, Terence
Smith recorded this discussion.
|
|
|
TERENCE
SMITH: For more the status of Andrei Babitsky and the current state
of the Russian media, we turn to Tom Dine, president of Radio Free Europe
and Radio Liberty, headquartered in Prague; and Ellen Mickiewicz, a
professor at Duke University and author of a recent book called Changing
Channels: Television and the Struggle for Power in Russia. Welcome
to you both.
Now, it's a fact that Andrei Babitsky's reporting has been something
of a thorn in the Kremlin's side, has it not?
TOM
DINE, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty: It's been extraordinary because
the recent violations of human rights that have been reported by Human
Rights Watch and other great human rights organizations really were
the essence of his reporting in December and the first part of January.
Only really two media in Russia were reporting the facts of civilian
deaths and violence to the Chechen citizens were NTV and Radio Liberty
by Andrei Babitsky.
TERENCE SMITH: One of the television channels, NTV?
TOM DINE: Yes.
TERENCE SMITH: Do you assume, therefore, that he was first arrested
by the Russian military and then ostensibly traded because of his reporting?
TOM DINE: That is a basic assumption on our part and the part of his
colleagues in Russia, in Moscow particularly.
TERENCE SMITH: Is it in part because he works for a U.S.-funded radio?
TOM
DINE: I don't think so. I'd like not to think so. We may be an aggravation
to certain ultra-nationalists, but I think people respect our objectivity,
the fact that we uphold Western journalism's highest standards of balance
and accuracy, not just rumors. And Babitsky reported in such a way during
the first Chechen war with Russia in 1994-1996 that he won awards for
the accuracy of his reporting, the graphic-ness of these reports and
the fact that state television and state radio and state newspapers
were not reporting any of this, and this is true today.
|
 |
|
TERENCE
SMITH: Ellen Mickiewicz, what does -- you're familiar with the media
in Russia. This story, what does it say to you about the state of press
freedom in Russia today?
ELLEN MICKIEWICZ, Duke University: I think it's always a struggle.
It's always tension between security and issues of national security,
wartime on the one hand, and press freedom on the other. It's always
going to be a struggle. And what the Russian military had thought they
would do in this war, as opposed to the first Chechen war, is simply
to cordon it off and try to keep the news of what's going on from the
news organizations. That's not a long-term strategy that works, as we
see. Information seeps out. It's not the best idea.
I think that what we are into now is a period when there is maybe setting
the stage for what will happen to press freedom in Russia and setting
the stage in terms of trying to carve out that area of press autonomy
that has so far been won and try to stabilize it even though it may
interfere with security goals in the short run or what might be thought
to be efficient.
Let
me just say a word about the media landscape because it is interesting
and it is diverse enough to give people different points of view. Tom
mentioned NTV. NTV's coverage has differed from the other two national
networks that carry a lot of news. NTV is the second largest network
even though about two-thirds of Russians actually receive it. In all
the polls, including the most recent ones, NTV's coverage is thought
to be far more objective and accurate than any other station. So, the
other side of the press scene in Russia, I think, is that there is an
audience there, an audience that is smart and savvy and able to make
judgments when it sees differences in how news is covered. I think that's
really important.
TERENCE SMITH: Professor, do you think that the Russian people are
getting a fair and full picture of what's going on in Chechnya?
ELLEN MICKIEWICZ: It's not comprehensive, of course not. That's true.
It's very hard to gain access to this area, and although NTV is carrying
news of casualties and setbacks and the other two stations are doing
very little of that, so far there hasn't really been investigation of
these alleged atrocities that are coming out now, dribbling out through
witnesses. But part of that is a real lack of access. NTV I think was
slow to start covering this impact on civilians in Chechnya, but it
is doing that now.
TERENCE SMITH: Tom Dine, what's your view of that?
TOM
DINE: I agree with what Ellen has said. The two state-owned television
stations have towed the party line. This provides enormous angst for
those of us who have gone through the Soviet Union period, and now we're
quite hopeful that once the curtain went up and the Soviet Union fell
apart that these freedoms would come and would stay, but they're quite
fragile and the Putin government is on record as saying, 'We must centralize
authority. We must control the news and this is a war of national security
and we must, therefore, report only what we want to report.'
ELLEN MICKIEWICZ: May I just --
TERENCE SMITH: Go ahead.
ELLEN
MICKIEWICZ: -- say something there. Putin is speaking in many different
ways. And I think what we're seeing is a casting-about for just where
Vladimir Putin is going to end up in terms of a possible presidential
administration. Part of him does speak in the sense of, 'We must do
only what is militarily necessary and keep out the press if we think
that will help,' and on the other hand, he will pull back when receiving
opposite advice and appear to understand the effects of this on the
international scene and the effects of this at home because what we
see at home, too, that is in Russia, is a real kind of corporate outpouring
on the part of journalists in Russia to indicate their sense that these
are freedoms that have to be kept and must be maintained and supported.
You referred to the special issue in which many different journalists,
the Journalists
Union of Russia, 120,000 strong, came out against this -- came out --
they are very aware of the importance of perhaps the greatest achievement
that the post-Soviet Russian government has actually made possible,
which is freedom of expression.
|
|
|
TERENCE SMITH: The flow of information. Tom Dine, what did you think
when that edition came out?
TOM DINE: When that edition came out? It was fantastic. There were
at least 180,000 copies that were distributed all over the streets of
Moscow.
TERENCE SMITH: This is the first time they've done anything like this
in eight or nine years.
TOM DINE: I believe two issues came out in 1991 during the failed coup
of August of 1991 and then shortly thereafter when the end came for
the Soviet Union and then again in October of 1993 when there was the
assault on the parliament.
TERENCE SMITH: Final word, Ellen Mickiewicz?
ELLEN
MICKIEWICZ: Although I think the Babitsky case is very important and
I think it's very important that it's mobilized journalistic forces
both in Russia and outside because these are the most important ones,
I think, I think it's still a case that's closer to issues of national
security, misunderstood but nonetheless national security, than it is
to the everyday work of journalists. So I think it in some ways it's
a special case but one that bears great watching.
TERENCE SMITH: OK. Tom Dine, your --
TOM
DINE: I can't help but say I disagree with that. Yeltsin with all his
faults, President Yeltsin, once he assumed the powers of the presidency,
welcomed Radio Liberty to come to Russia physically from its headquarters
in Munich at the time, come to Russia, open a bureau. He issued a presidential
decree to allow us to open a bureau. The first step of Putin is to try
to close us down, if you will, to silence one of our reporters. The
prospects are not good.
TERENCE SMITH: All right. I'm afraid we have to leave it there. Tom
Dine, Ellen Mickiewicz, thank you very much both.
|
|