|
| MOHAMED ELBARADEI | |
February 14, 2003 | |
|
The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency told the council that U.N. inspectors so far have not found any evidence that Iraq has resumed its nuclear weapons program, but there was more work for inspectors to do. |
|
MR. ELBARADEI: Mr. President,
my report to the council today is an update on the status of IAEA's nuclear
verification activities in Iraq, pursuant to Security Council Resolution
1441 and other relevant resolutions. Less than three weeks have passed since my last update to the council on 27 January, a relatively short period in the overall inspection process. However, I believe it is important for the council to remain actively engaged and fully informed at this critical time. The focus of the IAEA inspection has moved from the reconnaissance phase into the investigative phase. The reconnaissance phase was aimed at reestablishing rapidly our knowledge base of Iraq's nuclear capabilities, ensuring that nuclear activities at known key facilities had not been resumed, verifying the location of nuclear material and relevant non-nuclear material and equipment, and identifying the current workplace of former key Iraqi personnel. The focus of the investigative phase is achieving an understanding of Iraq's activities over the last four years, in particular in areas identified by states as being of concern, and those identified by the IAEA on the basis of its own analysis. Since our 27 January report, the IAEA has conducted an additional 38 inspections at 19 locations, for a total of 177 inspections at 125 locations. Iraq has continued to provide immediate access to all locations. In the course of the inspections, we have identified certain facilities at which we will be establishing containment and surveillance systems in order to monitor on a continuous basis activities associated with critical, dual-use equipment. At this time, we are using recurrent inspections to ensure that this equipment is not being used for prohibited purposes. As I mentioned in my last report to the council, we have a number of wide-area and location-specific measures for detecting indications of undeclared past or ongoing nuclear activities in Iraq, including environmental sampling and radiation-detection surveys. In this regard, we have been collecting a broad variety of samples,
including water, sediment and vegetation, at inspected facilities and
at other locations across Iraq and analyzing them for signature of nuclear
activities. In addition, discussion has continued to be conducted with Iraqi technicians
and officials as part of inspection activities and technical meetings.
I should note that during our recent meeting in Baghdad, Iraq reconfirmed
its commitment
to encourage its citizens to accept interviews in private both inside
and outside of Iraq. We will continue, however, to ask for information about Iraqi personnel
of lesser rank whose work may be of significance to our mandate. I should mention that, shortly before our recent meeting in Baghdad,
and based on our discussion with Iraqi counterpart, Iraq provided documentations
related to these issues: the reported attempt to import uranium, the
attempted procurement of aluminum tubes, the procurement of magnets
and magnet production capabilities, the use of HMX and, those questions
and concerns that were outstanding in 1998. However, we are still exploring whether the tubes were intended rather for the manufacture of centrifuges for uranium enrichment. In connection with this investigation, Iraq has been asked to explain the reasons for the high-tolerance specifications that it had requested from various suppliers. Iraq has provided documentations related to the project of reverse
engineering, and has committed itself to providing samples of tubes
received from prospective suppliers. We
will continue to investigate the matter further. Our review of these documents suggests that the carbon fibers sought
by Iraq was not intended for enrichment purpose, as the specification
of the material appear not to be consistent with those needed for manufacturing
rotor tubes. In addition, we have carried out follow-up inspection,
during which we have been able to observe the use of such carbon fibers
in non-nuclear-related applications and to take samples. The IAEA will
nevertheless continue to pursue this matter. As I reported earlier, Iraq has declared that 32 tons of the HMX, previously
under IAEA seals, had been transferred for use in the production of
industrial explosives, primarily to cement plants as a booster for explosives
used in quarrying. However, given the nature of the use of high explosives, it may well
be that the IAEA will be unable to reach a final conclusion on the end
use of this material. While we have no
indication that this material was used for any application other than
that declared by Iraq, we have no technical method of verifying quantitatively
the declared use of the material in explosions. We will continue to
follow this issue through a review of civilian mining practices in Iraq
and through interviews of key Iraqi personnel involved in former relevant
research and development activities. Nothing contained in the documents alters the conclusion previously drawn by the IAEA concerning the extent of Iraq's laser enrichment program. We, nevertheless, continue to emphasize to Iraq that it should search
for and provide all documents, personal or otherwise, that might be
relevant to our mandate. The resolution of this long-standing legal matter was, in my
view, a step in the right direction for Iraq to demonstrate its
commitment to fulfilling its obligations under Security Council
resolutions. To strengthen and accelerate our ability to investigate matters of
concern and to reinstate and reinforce our ongoing monitoring and verification
system that came to a halt in 1998, we intend to increase the number
of inspectors and support staff. We will also be adding more analysts
and translators to support analysis of documents and
other inspection finding. We intend to augment the number of customs
and procurement experts for the monitoring of imports by Iraq. We will
also intensify and expand the range of technical meetings and private
interviews with Iraqi personnel, in accordance with our preferred modalities
and locations, both inside and outside Iraq. Hence, our focus since the resumption of our inspection in Iraq two
and a half months ago has been verifying whether Iraq revived its nuclear
program in the intervening years. To that end, we intend to make full use of the authority granted to
us under all relevant Security Council resolutions to build as much
capacity into the inspection process as necessary. In that context,
I would underline the importance of information that states may be able
to provide to help us in assessing the accuracy and completeness of
the information provided by Iraq. However, prompt, full and active cooperation by Iraq, as required under
Resolution 1441, will speed up the process, and more importantly, it
will enable us to reach the high degree of assurance required by the
Security Council in the case of Iraq, in view of its past clandestine
WMD programs and past pattern of cooperation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||
|
|||||
| |||||
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | |||||