Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

a NewsHour with Jim Lehrer Transcript
Online NewsHourOnline Focus
IGOR IVANOV

March 7, 2003
Iraq/U.N.

Russia's minister for foreign affairs emphasized that "the possibilities for disarming Iraq through political means do exist" and said that his nation was in favor of "continuing and strengthening the inspections activities."

realaudio

 
NewsHour Links

Online Special:
Intervention in Iraq?

 

News for Students: The Iraq Conflict

 

 

Outside Links

The United Nations

 

IGOR IVANOV (Through interpreter): Mr. President, Mr. Secretary General, distinguished colleagues, the Iraq problem has many aspects to it. On the one hand, we all agree that we must achieve full and effective disarmament of Iraq, in accordance with United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441. On the other hand, it is quite clear that the way in which we resolve this problem will determine not just the future of Iraq. In essence, we are now laying the foundations for ensuring peace and security in our time.

Herein lies the special responsibility we have at the moment and the choice which we will have to make. If we succeed, through our joint efforts, at resolving the Iraq crisis, pursuant to the United Nations Charter, this of course will have a positive effect on our efforts at settling other conflicts. And most importantly, it will become an important step towards a new, just and secure world order.

This is why Russia has consistently and unswervingly been striving to resolve the Iraq problem on the basis of international law and United Nations Security Council resolutions. And today we have, more than ever before, grounds for stating that this is not only the real but the most reliable way.

The report submitted by Mr. Blix demonstrates that thanks to our common energetic work, thanks to the pressure which has been brought to bear on Baghdad from all sides, including through a buildup of military presence, we have been able to achieve essential progress in implementation of Resolution 1441.

Let us take a look at the facts.

In Iraq there has been introduced, and there is under way, an enhanced inspections regime. The international inspectors are being given immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, unrestricted access to any sites. During the course of the inspections, active use is being made of helicopters and aircraft, and this is also for aerial surveillance purposes. On the whole, the level of cooperation of the Iraqi authorities with the inspectors is thoroughly different from the practice we saw under the previous United Nations Special Commission.

Mr. Blix and Mr. ElBaradei have pointed out repeatedly, and this includes in their latest reports, problems in conducting interviews with Iraqi specialists. We agree with the view that the Iraqi leadership must more energetically encourage its citizens to take part in these interviews without minders.

Judging from the latest reports, such interviews are gradually beginning to become the norm. During the process of the inspections, qualitatively new changes have taken place in carrying out concrete tasks -- qualitative changes. I repeat: For the first time in many years, in Iraq, there is a process of real disarmament underway. Weapons banned by Security Council resolutions are being eliminated. These are the Al-Samoud 2 missiles, which were officially declared by the Iraqi side and are now being destroyed under UNMOVIC's supervision. These are the discovered 120-mm shells which can carry poisonous chemical substances. The Iraqis have transmitted to the inspectors for analysis fragments of more than 100 R-400 aerial bombs. The experts are working on the possibility of analyzing ground soil in areas where the VX gas and anthrax growth media have been destroyed. Baghdad has transmitted to the inspectors some dozens of new documents, which are now being analyzed.

I repeat, all of these are facts, and these are two facts which show that the process of the activities of the inspectors is developing. In principle, we agree with the view of Mr. Blix that if the latest positive steps taken by Baghdad had been undertaken earlier, then the results right now would be more convincing. But it is important that these steps have been taken. And as the leader of UNMOVIC and the leader of IAEA have pointed out, they open up the way to solving remaining problems. I would like to emphasize once again, they open up the way to resolving remaining problems. This is important in principle.

Furthermore, I would like to draw your attention to yet another aspect which Mr. Blix highlighted, and that is long-term monitoring for the non-production of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. This is yet another important safety machinery which safeguards that Iraq will not produce weapons of mass destruction in future either.

In this connection, the question arises, is it now reasonable to halt the inspections and in that way eliminate the momentum gained in the process of Iraq's disarmament? Let us take another look. What is really in the genuine interests of the world community? Continuing the albeit difficult but clearly fruitful results of the inspectors' work, or resorting to force, which inevitably will result in enormous loss of life and is fraught with serious and unpredictable consequences for regional and international stability? It is our deep conviction that the possibilities for disarming Iraq through political means do exist. And they really exist. And this cannot but be acknowledged.

Now, we need not new Security Council resolutions. We have enough of those. We need now active support of the inspectors in carrying out their tasks.

Russia is firmly in favor of continuing and strengthening the inspections activities and making them more focused in nature. This goal would be furthered by the speedy, in the days to come, submission for approval by the United Nations Security Council of an UNMOVIC program of work with the inclusion in it of a list of key remaining disarmament tasks. Such tasks should be formulated with the utmost clarity and should be realizable. This would enable us objectively to evaluate the level of cooperation of Iraq, and most importantly, to provide an exhaustive answer to all the remaining open questions on banned Iraqi military programs.

Mr. President, distinguished colleagues, of course we all face a difficult choice. Hardly anyone from among us could claim to be in possession of the absolute truth. Therefore, it is quite natural that during the course of our discussion different points of view be expressed. But such differences should not lead to a rift among us. We are all standing on the same side of the barricade. We all share common values. And only acting in solidarity can we effectively face up to new global threats and challenges.

We are certain that the United Nations Security Council must emerge from the Iraq crisis not weakened and divided, but united and strong. And Russia will work further towards that goal.

Thank you, sir.

 


    REGIONS | TOPICS | RECENT PROGRAMS | ABOUT US | FEEDBACK |SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS:
POD|RSS
SEARCH
Funded, in part, by:ChevronIntelBNSF RailwayWells FargoToyotaMonsantoCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.