|
| IRAQI PRISONER ABUSE | |
May 4, 2004 |
|
|
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told reporters Tuesday that the actions of U.S. soldiers photographed abusing Iraqi prisoners are "totally unacceptable and un-American." Two members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, members of which received a closed door briefing on the allegations Tuesday, discuss the potential impact of the abuse scandal and investigations into U.S. military prison practices. |
|
So far, six soldiers have been charged, and at least six others, including the commanding officer at the prison, have been reprimanded. At the Pentagon this afternoon, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said the military's first investigation was launched the day after the abuses were reported, a press release on the allegations was issued in mid-January, and six investigations either are completed or ongoing. Rumsfeld then fielded questions from the Pentagon press corps. CHARLES ALDINGER, Reuters: Mr. Secretary, this administration has said repeatedly that in removing Saddam Hussein, the United States has gotten rid of a man who has murdered and raped and pillaged and tortured people in his country. And now these photographs and stories show that in fact the U.S. military has done that to prisoners in Iraq. And you say that this has -- I believe you said it's damaged U.S. attempts to establish trust in the country. I guess I'd ask you more broadly, is this a major setback for U.S. efforts in Iraq?
MARTHA RADDATZ, ABC News: General Myers said on Sunday that he had not seen the report. I don't believe you had seen the report even if -- I don't know if you have now. Isn't this something you would have liked to have been flagged about? DONALD RUMSFELD: It's, I guess the way to put it is that the department has been aware of it since it was first noticed, and up the chain of command we're told that there were investigations into alleged abuses as long ago as last Jan. 16. It takes time for reports to be finished -- correction: to be gathered. This is a very comprehensive report. I mean, the fact of the matter is that this is a serious problem. And it's something that the department is addressing. The system works. The system works. There were some allegations of abuse in a detention facility in Iraq. It was reported in the chain of command. Immediately it was announced to the public. Immediately an investigation was initiated. Six separate investigations have been undertaken over a period of months since January. REPORTER: On Capitol Hill today, there was quite a bit of anger expressed at the fact that they're just finding out about this now. Shouldn't you have done a better job keeping Congress informed? At least they feel they should have been kept informed. DONALD RUMSFELD: Well, we informed the world on Jan. 16 that these investigations were under way. It seems to me that that is a perfectly proper thing to do. The investigations were announced. The world knew it. It was briefed to the press and the world.
What is being done correctly -- and we want to take care of an event that is -- as bad as it is, we do not want to turn our justice system on its head in response to it. We want at each level for each commander to do his or her duty, which is to take the documentation that they have, read it thoroughly -- and these things can be that thick -- take the time, read it thoroughly, make the judgments that they must make, see whether or not there's some other facet of this that should be looked into at their level, make the decisions they're able to do, and pass it on up the chain. REPORTER: A number of times from the podium you've said U.S. troops do not torture individuals. Is this one of those rare exceptions here that torture took place? DONALD RUMSFELD: I think that -- I'm not a lawyer. My impression is that what has been charged thus far is abuse, which I believe technically is different from torture. Just a minute. I don't know if the -- it is correct to say what you just said, that torture has taken place, or that there's been a conviction for torture. And therefore I'm not going to address the "torture" word. There's no question but that it has been my conviction that all of our rules, all of our procedures, all of our training is against abuse of people that are detained. You know that. I know that. I've been over it in detail. And the fact that it happens, notwithstanding the fact that it's against everything that they're taught, against everything that we believe, it's also against anything that any individual on their own ought to believe is right. And so there's, all I can say is what I've said. REPORTER: Mr. Secretary, have you yet read the Taguba report? DONALD RUMSFELD: It's -- which -- yeah. You're -- I think you're talking about the executive summary. I've seen the executive summary. REPORTER: Have you read through it, sir?
REPORTER: Just to follow up on Jamie's question, given the ramifications of not only what is in this report, the findings specifically, but the pictures, the photographs that you knew, as of a couple of weeks ago, were going to be broadcast, why did you not feel incumbent upon you at that time to ask for the findings, to take a look at the pictures beforehand, so you could perhaps be prepared to deal with some of the world reaction? DONALD RUMSFELD: I think I did inquire about the pictures and was told that we didn't have copies. REPORTER: Mr. Secretary, I did ask how you felt this episode has in fact damaged the U.S. efforts. DONALD RUMSFELD: I've answered that. I answered that earlier. I'm not in a position to make a judgment. Time will tell. Clearly we would wish it would not because it is an exceptional, isolated... we hope an isolated case. And our country is our country, and it is a wonderful country. And the American people are wonderful people, and our armed forces are wonderful people. And when one drops a plumb line through the totality of that, is it perfect? No. Are there things like this that happen? Yes. But over time, the people tend to find their way to fair, reasonable conclusions. KWAME HOLMAN: The Senate Intelligence Committee announced today it
will hold a closed hearing on the abuse tomorrow afternoon. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reaction from lawmakers | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
JIM LEHRER: And to Margaret Warner.
Based on the briefing you all got this morning, Senator Levin, what's your conclusion about what went wrong? What explains those photographs we saw of American soldiers abusing Iraqi prisoners?
We know that there's been six troops, six soldiers who have been the subject of criminal investigations. Apparently three of them have already been referred for a court martial. Three of them are still under investigation. We've got a couple of officers, noncommissioned, and a couple of general officers who are under investigation, and who have, I think, already been disciplined to some extent. But this is just really the beginning of what is required here, which is a very thorough, a very intense, a very tough, and a very prompt investigation. MARGARET WARNER: Senator Sessions, how detailed was this morning's briefing that you all got? For example, did they take questions or talk to you all about allegations that have been in the newspaper that not only active duty military, but in fact perhaps private contractors and military intelligence and perhaps even CIA people were involved? How much detail did you get?
MARGARET WARNER: So, in other words, were you told, essentially, that the military isn't sure yet, the investigators aren't sure yet how high up the responsibility goes? SEN. JEFF SESSIONS: Well, we were told some of that. Some things we were told, they were not sure about. But I think it's pretty clear that at least a couple of contractors may have been involved. Interestingly, I authored a piece of legislation in 2000 that deals with the ability to prosecute employees of the Department of Defense, civilian employees, if they violate laws outside the country. So I think that statute, in fact, would cover the circumstances, and would allow for a prosecution of a contractor in a United States court if they violated any law. MARGARET WARNER: And did that legislation pass? That is law? SEN. JEFF SESSIONS: Yes, it did. It passed in 2000. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluating the system of reporting abuses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SEN. CARL LEVIN: The people who briefed us this morning didn't have any reference to this kind of abuse, but as to allegations of abuse of prisoners, there have been a number of those allegations over the last couple years. There have been many of them. They have been in various places in the investigative process. But this type of abuse, we were told by our briefers, was not similar to the other types, which we were informed about, at least numerically. MARGARET WARNER: Senator Sessions, today at his press conference, Secretary Rumsfeld -- and he was speaking now of the way the Department of Defense has handled it -- he said "the system worked." And by that, he said he meant that once a single soldier complained in January, an investigation was immediately started. Other investigations have been started. How do you judge the way the Department of Defense has handled this?
MARGARET WARNER: Senator Levin, your view on that, about whether the system worked? SEN. CARL LEVIN: The system did not work in terms of the notice to the Congress of a very, very serious incident that's going to have an effect on America, our security, and on our troops for a long time to come. This report was finished sometime in February, we're now told. It was acted upon in early April, we're now told. We knew nothing about it until we saw it on a TV show. At the same day that Secretary Rumsfeld came up here to brief us on events in Iraq, he didn't even tell us that same day as to what was going to explode that evening, although he apparently knew all about it. So in terms of informing the public, this is just too secretive an administration on this issue, and on too many other issues. MARGARET WARNER: Now, let me just remind you of what Secretary Rumsfeld said about that today, and General Pace said the same thing: That these investigations go up a chain of command, and that each successive level is supposed to read the whole report, deal with it at their level, and that there's a sort of methodical process. Are you saying that should have been leapfrogged at some point and come directly to your committee, and if so, what would you have done about it?
We know there's contractors now that were apparently either involved or who knew about it, and it's stunning to me that we have contractors doing interrogation. That's something we surely should have been informed about a long time before now. So I'm not at all satisfied. I hope the investigation has been thorough as far as the Army can go, but I don't think we can take that for granted. We have to have checks and balances, we've got to have oversight, and that's what hopefully the Armed Services Committee is going to do. MARGARET WARNER: And general -- Senator Sessions -- excuse me, I almost made you a general -- you share that view that at least once these charges had been filed and these actions had been taken, your committee should have been told? SEN. JEFF SESSIONS: Well, I think so. I think the results of the confusion make clear that it would have been better had that occurred. I did want to say, though, really, the Defense Department moved on this. They charged people, and they followed up with a thorough investigation by a high-ranking officer. That's what we expect of them. They did not, I think, handle the public relations well, and it's made it more difficult for us than otherwise would have been the case. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The roles of contractors and training | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SEN. JEFF SESSIONS: Well, let me say this: I think every soldier is taught the Geneva Conventions. They're taught how to treat a prisoner of war, even if they're not in the MPs, the military police. Apparently these soldiers were military police. Some of them had been correctional officers before. No matter how many were there, how did they have time to do this kind of thing? This is unacceptable by any American standards of law or the military law. So I think how many troops we had there or whether they were thoroughly trained in prisons is really beside the point. The question is, did they have enough supervision? Were they managed effectively? Certainly they made individual decisions that were just calamitous. MARGARET WARNER: Senator Levin, your view on that issue, and what you heard this morning about whether there were adequate, trained military people to do this job? SEN. CARL LEVIN: Well, I think that -- I don't know about the training. We'll find that out during the investigation. It shouldn't take special training, frankly, for people not to behave this way. That should not be needed. This is just so basic. This kind of conduct, it seems to me, is so brutal, it's so bestial that it shouldn't take special training for anybody not to participate in that kind of conduct.
SEN. JEFF SESSIONS: I have a little different tact on that. We have a lot of former military people with military intelligence experience -- former FBI agents, police officers -- who can be contracted to handle these kind of interrogations, and are used to doing it in these circumstances. So I don't complain that they've used contractors. I think it could be very helpful, really. But it does indicate that we need good supervision and good management. No one can be left unsupervised in these kind of circumstances. MARGARET WARNER: Senator Sessions and Senator Levin, thank you both. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | ||
| PBS Online Privacy Policy Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved. | ||