|
| REMEMBERING THE GI BILL | |
July 4, 2000 |
|
|
The education and housing benefits World War II veterans received from the GI Bill transformed society. After a background report, Jim Lehrer leads a discussion about the bill's legacy with a panel of historians. |
|
JIM LEHRER: Now, some further perspective on the GI Bill from NewsHour regulars presidential historians Doris Kearns Goodwin and Michael Beschloss, journalist/author Haynes Johnson; joining them tonight Historian Stephen Ambrose, who's written extensively on World War II. His last book was Citizen Soldiers: the U.S. Army from the Normandy Beaches to the Bulge to the Surrender of Germany. |
|||||||||||||||||||
| A bill that "made modern America" | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Steve Ambrose, how important was the GI Bill to this country
right after the war?
JIM LEHRER: Transformed our country, Doris? DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: Oh, no question. I agree with everything Steve said, including the passion with which he said it. I think few laws have had so much effect on so many people. It meant that blue collar workers, a whole generation of blue collar workers were enabled to go to college, become doctors, lawyers, and engineers, and that their children would grow up in a middle class family. It meant, as Stephen said, that people had homes, instead of being renters in the city, so that they could bring up their children in a home that they had owned.
JIM LEHRER: "Extraordinary." "amazing." Haynes, those words do jump to mind, don't you think? HAYNES JOHNSON: Yeah. And what they said is right; it did transform the country. It made a difference. Steve Ambrose got his graduate degree in Wisconsin. I was on the GI Bill after Korea, and I got a scaled down version, but that's how I got my graduate degree. JIM LEHRER: I bought my first house on the GI Bill.
JIM LEHRER: Michael, was the transformation intentional, or was it an accidental end result of the GI Bill?
JIM LEHRER: Do you read the record the same way, or that what they were really aiming to do was to reward the veterans, not to change American society, but it just happened? |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
| From soldiers to dedicated students | ||||||||||||||||||||
| STEPHEN AMBROSE: Oh, yes, that's absolutely right, and let's
remember, this does go back to the Revolutionary War. Revolutionary War
soldiers got land bonuses after the war was over, and America has always
tried to do something for its veterans after the Civil War. It didn't
do very well after World War I, which is why the Bonus March had to take
place. But the GI Bill was designed to help veterans, not to transform
America. No one had that idea in mind. But I'll tell you. Millions of
GIs who never, never dreamed that they might be able to go to college
suddenly had the opportunity, and these guys went, and they became - there's
a teacher in this country who isn't aware of this - the best students
we've ever had. God, they worked so hard, and they - all of them - came
back to America feeling I just wasted the best years of my life. I know
how to man a machine gun; I know how to fire a mortar; but I can't make
a living out of this.
And now they had college opened up to them, and these guys went on a make of 21 hours a semester, 24 hours a semester, and they worked. They just wanted to get that education. I lived in a small college town in Wisconsin, and the houses all around us were divided up into little rooms where the GIs could stay. We had a basketball court in our backyard, and these guys would come over and we'd play - I was 10 years old - we would play basketball together - shirt and skins - damned near every one of them had a scar. And the only recreation they ever took was we'd do an hour of basketball and then it was right back to the books for them, and they're the students that every teacher in this country would just kill to have. JIM LEHRER: But, Steve, what drove them to go to school? They didn't think about going to college when they went into the army. What happened in the army that - to cause them to take advantage of the GI Bill when they got out?
One of the things that the army or the navy or the air force or the coast guard or the marines have done for them was - they could see - you do your job, you do it well, you're going to get promoted. And if you do that job well, you're going to get promoted again, and pretty soon you're going to be in officer's candidate school. And then you're going to get a battlefield commission and then you're going to go from lieutenant to captain and captain to major and so on. They saw it with their own eyes. They experienced with their own bodies the joys of moving ahead. JIM LEHRER: And, Doris, to use the word transforming society, I mean, the legacy of what happened to those World War II vets continues to this day, does it not, in our society? DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: Oh, without question, it's the generation that really built the whole decades that followed after that. You know, just following on what Steve said, most of the people who went into the GI - into the soldier's war - had not left their counties; they hadn't traveled much in the United States. So suddenly they are in this war; they're all over the world; they see things they have never seen before. So possibilities open to them, and I think that's partly what led to that changing attitude toward their educational possibilities I'm going to take advantage of as well. The other thing that's so interesting to remember is that during this debate it was opened up as a possibility that the war workers at home would be eligible, as well, for the GI Bill of Rights, and think of what that would have meant. Women - 60 percent of the jobs in the shipyards and the airplane factories held by women - instead of those women going home and being thrown out of work and then becoming a generation that really didn't move forward until the next generation, think of the social revolution that might have prevailed. |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
| A gateway to the middle class | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
HAYNES JOHNSON: Really, this word "transforming" that he used, Steven used, that's what it did. I mean, the country - we were a class country; we're not supposed to be, this democracy -- equality, "up from the bottom," "make it on your own," "Horatio Alger," all of that -- but this made it possible to go to college, and that wasn't the case of most Americans. They actually had the opportunity. And the irony of this, we're talking about, this was the biggest government grant, in effect, it was the government, federal government. Today people hate the government. This was once there was no debate about it. There's no controversy about it. There's no ideological argument about it. JIM LEHRER: Why is that, Michael? Why is there no argument? Why does everybody - whether you're from the very far right or the very far left or Republican or Democrat and everything else in-between, everybody loves the GI Bill. MICHAEL BESCHLOSS: Because it succeeded so well - that's the first thing. And the other thing - JIM LEHRER: Not everybody wanted society transformed, did they? MICHAEL BESCHLOSS: No, absolutely. At the time that the bill was debated in Congress it passed only by a very slim margin, and, in fact, a lot of -- particularly Republicans -- said let's not pass this thing because a big part of the GI Bill was to give returning vets $20 a week for 52 weeks. They felt that would encourage sloth; that people would not try to get jobs. They thought that this would extend the welfare state, rather than do the opposite. But the other thing I think really endures as a part of America's philosophy is this linked the idea of service to education. You serve the country; the government pays you back by allowing you educational opportunities you otherwise wouldn't have had, and that in turn helps to approve this society. That's something that goes al the way back to the time of he Revolution, and I think it's one reason why we think of it so fondly. JIM LEHRER: Yeah. And, Steve, do you agree that this country that we live in today was changed by the GI Bill? I mean, there are things - STEPHEN AMBROSE: Absolutely. Listen, Haynes and I went to the University of Wisconsin, and I was a little bit later than he was because I'm a little bit younger than he was (laughter), but just think what it did in Madison or in Cambridge or in East Lansing or in Berkeley. The American educational establishment of today, which is the envy of the world, was made by the GI Bill and those veterans who came back brought about this enormous expansion and jobs for professors and jobs for technicians and jobs in the laboratories and students going to school learning and then going out into the world and applying what they have learned, the beginning of modern America. Listen, these GIs -- and that includes the marines and the navy and the air force of course - these GIs made modern America, and they did it because the government had enough sense to say we're going to educate these guys. We're not going to be stingy as we were after Word War II; we're going to give these guys an opportunity, and they could go to Harvard. They could go to Stanford. They could go to the University of Chicago. They could go, as Art Buchwald did, to the Sorbonne in Paris and get 50 bucks a month if they weren't married, 75 if they were. Later on, that figure was moved up, and they could and study and work and improve themselves, and the institutions that served them, that grew out of this - like the state teacher's colleges in Wisconsin -- or like Harvard and all the others in between - they all benefited from it. |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
| The rise of the suburbs | ||||||||||||||||||||
| JIM LEHRER: And, Doris, there's also the housing thing.
I mean, it revolutionized the way people live in this country, to this
day, right?
JIM LEHRER: Michael. MICHAEL BESCHLOSS: I hate to be a downer. One thing that it didn't work so well at was helping black Americans. Many black Americans who got GI benefits could not get into some of these towns - Levittown on Long Island was segregated. You couldn't buy a house if you were black. Many colleges - JIM LEHRER: The federal government - the GI Bill law did not resolve that. MICHAEL BESCHLOSS: No. Would give you the money and would give you the money to go to a school, but oftentimes colleges were segregated too. It took civil rights legislation and the Supreme Court in the 50s and 60s to really make the GI Bill do what it ultimately was able to do. JIM LEHRER: Yeah. What would you add to the housing things, Haynes? HAYNES JOHNSON: Well, I think the nature of the country and the way we live today, the highways, the cars, the suburban element of it is - that's what America is now. We are no longer in the central cities of our country, and the idea - what Michael is talking about, civil rights, that came later. We focused on civil rights and women's rights - tremendous changes there, but this one came first. And then the integration of the armed forces and then the civil rights, and they all kind of together, I think, really made the difference. JIM LEHRER: Well, it's stunning - and you have all said it - how one piece of legislation could have such an effect and once you start thinking about it, those effects grow and grow and grow. And thank you all four very much. |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | ||
| PBS Online Privacy Policy Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved. | ||