Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

a NewsHour with Jim Lehrer Transcript
Online NewsHour Online Focus
THE CIVILIAN-MILITARY GAP

November 10, 1999
gap

 


Following this background report, Margaret Warner discusses the growing gap between civilian and military thought with four experts, both civilian and military. Also, join in an online forum to discuss the issue.

realaudio

NewsHour Links

Nov. 1999:
Online Forum: Four experts take your questions on the civil-military gap.

Nov. 1999:
Background on the civil-military gap by forum participants.

Sept. 20, 1999:
A report on the lobbying campaign to save the defense project F-22.

July 1, 1999:
Gen. Wesley Clark discusses the war in Kosovo and the military lessons learned.

April 15, 1999:
A look at the continuing debate over the use of ground forces in Yugoslavia.

April 8, 1999:
Two experts discuss the draft issue in comparison to an all-volunteer military force.

April 6, 1999:
A discussion on mounting tensions between the Pentagon and the press over the news from the front.

April 6, 1998:
Should men and women should go through military basic training together?

Dec. 16, 1997:
A special commission suggests separating military training by gender

Browse the NewsHour's coverage of the military

 

Outside Links

The TISS Project on the Gap Between the Military and Civilian Society

"The Origins of the American Military Coup of 2012" by Charles Dunlap

The Pentagon

The Department of Defense

MARGARET WARNER: Through much of American history, the United States relied on citizen soldiers drawn from every strata of society, who fought the nation's wars, then returned to their civilian lives. The end of the Vietnam War brought an end to the draft, in favor of an all-volunteer professional force.

SOLDIER: Keep going, keep going, keep going!

soldiersMARGARET WARNER: One thing remained constant, however. The nation's soldiers, while led by military officers, all serve under a civilian. The president, with oversight by a popularly elected Congress, a system designed by the framers of the Constitution to maintain civilian control of the military. Now, since the end of the Cold War, a number of articles and studies have suggested there is a growing gap -- political and social -- between the military and the civilian society it serves.

crawlThe gap was apparent in differences over social and cultural issues, highlighted by the confrontation over gays in the military in the first days of the Clinton administration. General Colin Powell and the Joint Chiefs of Staff publicly challenged the president's desire to let gays serve openly in the armed forces. Congress eventually compromised with legislation that allowed gays to serve, only if they weren't open about their homosexuality.

SOLDIER: You shoot two shots in the same place --

 
Multiple tensions
womanMARGARET WARNER: Another point of tension touching social and legal issues has involved the military's adjustment to the growing presence of women in its ranks. That was highlighted during the 1997 controversy over the discharge of Air Force lieutenant Kelly Flynn on charges of adultery and disobeying orders, a move that prompted a public outcry and a Senate hearing into the matter.

tankOther points of tension have involved the very essence of the military's mission, particularly over where and when to deploy troops. In 1993, the Pentagon resisted arguments by some in the White House and State Department to use force in Bosnia. General Powell complained later in his memoirs that American GIs were not toy soldiers to be moved around on some sort of global game board. U.S. air strikes were eventually launched in 1995 and ground troops deployed later that year.

In 1997, Secretary of Defense William Cohen, in a speech at Yale University, spoke about the growing gap between civilians and the military. "One of the challenges for me is to somehow prevent a chasm from developing between the military and civilian worlds," Cohen said, "where the civilian world doesn't fully grasp the mission of the military, and the military doesn't understand why the memories of our citizens and civilian policy makers are so short, or why the criticism is so quick and so unrelenting."

articleResponding to that, and to the raft of articles, a consortium of universities in North Carolina undertook a study of the military-civilian gap. The first phase of its study has just been released. Among its key findings: Fewer American civilian leaders -- including members of Congress -- have military experience; military and civilian leaders hold different views on the use of force; and military leaders are less tolerant of casualties than civilian leaders or the public.

Civilians are more receptive than military leaders to seeing women in combat and homosexuals serving openly in the military; top military officers tend to be more politically conservative than civilian society and more pessimistic about its moral health. They are also critical of the quality of civilian leadership and of civilian institutions like the press. In the past 25 years, top military officers have largely abandoned political neutrality, the study said, and have become more heavily Republican than civilian society as a whole.

cohen


    REGIONS | TOPICS | RECENT PROGRAMS | ABOUT US | FEEDBACK |SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS:
POD|RSS
SEARCH
Funded, in part, by:ChevronIntelBNSF RailwayBank of AmericaToyotaMonsantoCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.