Diffrent levels of distraction
RAY SUAREZ: If you're watching a person, either at a simulator or watching them, in fact, as they drive, what's different about the level of distraction if you're talking to an actual human being in the car versus talking to someone on the phone, versus getting a hit from them and then quickly typing back to them a response to their last message?
DAVID STRAYER: It's a good question, because you basically have two types of communication, the person sitting right next to you where the person that you would be talking to on a phone, both are conversations, but they turn out to have very different distraction profiles.
When someone has a passenger in the vehicle, they're actually slightly less likely to be involved in an accident than if they're driving by themselves. So there doesn't seem to be a substantial crash risk for passenger conversations. And, of course, cell phone conversations increase the risk substantially.
And one of the reasons for that is that, with a passenger, especially an adult passenger, they'll adjust their conversation depending on driving difficulties. So if driving becomes difficult, they might stop talking. They might alert the driver to hazards or remind them of their exit.
So what happens is you really have two sets of eyes with a passenger in the vehicle, and it produces a very different kind of conversation.
RAY SUAREZ: Is there much variation among drivers and their ability to do more than one thing at a time, between young and old drivers, between men and women, between people who are doing different kinds of driving?
DAVID STRAYER: Well, we know that there are some groups that seem to be at risk. Teen drivers, for example, tend to be at risk for trying to multitask. They're just learning how to drive, so some of the things that a more experienced driver might have automated or become habitual are still quite effortful for a teen driver, so, unfortunately, for the teens who are probably just learning to drive, and they're also probably the most likely to be multitasking, either using a cell phone, or an iPod, or text messaging.
There are some individual differences, but as far as we can tell, 98 percent of the population shows substantial significant impairments when they try and multitask using a cell phone.
RAY SUAREZ: So the bottom line, doing anything besides driving is going to make you a worse driver?
DAVID STRAYER: Well, not always. Those kinds of technologies that we just mentioned certainly are, but listening to the radio doesn't appear to produce substantial impairments. Listening to books on tape also doesn't seem to produce substantial impairments.
And that appears to be largely because a lot of the impairments associated with using a cell phone come from speech production, the actual generation of speech. And if you're just passively listening to conversations or the radio, it seems not to produce the kind of impairments that you'd see if you were actually engaged in a conversation on the phone.
RAY SUAREZ: Well, we have very little time left, but some states have passed laws against texting while driving. Others haven't. Have we seen any difference in those places yet?
DAVID STRAYER: I think it's too early to know. Utah, for example, just put a law in place, but it just went on the books July 1st. I think it's an uphill battle, just because you've got so many different ways that a person can be distracted with wireless technologies.
And so one of the things I think is likely to happen is, with text messaging and the impairments that we see, it's likely to raise the dialogue and the discourse about what we should do with driver distraction, because it's becoming a greater and greater problem.
RAY SUAREZ: Professor Strayer, thanks a lot for joining us.
DAVID STRAYER: Thank you. |