Is It Realistic for the President to Cut the Deficit in Half? | The Business Desk with Paul Solman | PBS NewsHour

ABOUT US \| LOCAL TV LISTINGS EMAIL PRINT

REGION: North America

TOPIC: Business & Economy

PBS NewsHour

Not a blog but a "q-and-a" (pronounced "quanda"), this page is about the basics of economics. Its premise: there are no stupid q's. And if some a's seem dim, take heart: I can brighten them up in response to objections, corrections, refinements. Comments on posts feature yours, and my responses. Enough of you now frequent and query the quanda that I post most every day. Haven't seen your q yet? Send it again. All a's should be taken with a shaker of sodium chloride, if not a Lot's-wife's-worth. And speaking of salt, the mustache and "hair" in the photo has a lot less of that condiment, and rather more pepper, than can be seen on TV. Think of it as time travel.

« Previous Entry | Main | Next Entry »

Is It Realistic for the President to Cut the Deficit in Half?

Name: bfredrich
City & State: Colorado Spring, Colo.

Obama; file photo

Question: Is it realistic for the president to cut the deficit in half in four years, even while spending on the war [in Iraq] and moving [troops] to Afghanistan?

Paul Solman: The skepticism seems clear and well-taken. The most important factor in cutting the deficit will be future economic growth, from which government revenues derive. And if the president can revive the economy, not only will government revenues grow, but government expenditures will shrink, since the stimulus package will be shorter-term and bailouts will no longer be needed.

That's why, for so many people who think deeply about the economy these days, the emphasis is not on the annual deficit, but on enough government spending to take up the slack being caused by the lack of consumer spending and business investment.

-- Posted March 10, 2009 | Comments ( ) | Permalink