PBS NewsHour
ABOUT US  |  LOCAL TV LISTINGS    EMAIL   PRINT
TopicsVideoRecent ProgramsTeacher ResourcesThe Rundown: news blogSubscribe rss | podcast


REGION: North America
TOPIC: Business & Economy
PBS NewsHour
The Business Desk with Paul Solman
Not a blog but a "q-and-a" (pronounced "quanda"), this page is about the basics of economics. Its premise: there are no stupid q's. And if some a's seem dim, take heart: I can brighten them up in response to objections, corrections, refinements. Comments on posts feature yours, and my responses. Enough of you now frequent and query the quanda that I post most every day. Haven't seen your q yet? Send it again. All a's should be taken with a shaker of sodium chloride, if not a Lot's-wife's-worth. And speaking of salt, the mustache and "hair" in the photo has a lot less of that condiment, and rather more pepper, than can be seen on TV. Think of it as time travel.

« Previous Entry | Main | Next Entry »

Response to Andrews-McArdle

Question: How do you react to the unseasonal blizzard of emails in response to the Megan McArdle post/the Ed Andrews parry/the McArdle riposte?

Paul Solman: Fascinating to see the strength of sentiment -- on both sides. Enough of the facts are out there for viewers and readers to form their own conclusions, I think. Personally, I should recuse myself in that I really liked Ed and wife Patty and was especially taken with the two children I met: a young adult son of his and her 11-year-old daughter. So I was quite sympathetic, I guess, to an answer of his that didn't make it into our NewsHour story. It came when I pressed the question, "How could you have fallen for it?"

"I didn't fall for it. I knew this was a huge gamble from the moment I took it on, but a house is the kind of thing that grabs a hold of you in so many different ways. It was absolutely the critical link for my kids to have the stability and continuity as I tried to start the second chapter of my life. It was crucial to having our families be able to come together, and we had a lot of children between the two of us. If it was just Patty and me we wouldn't have gone down this road. We had a boatload, a Brady-bunch load of kids between us and so you know this was the part that could make the dream come true and I had my own dream here."

This hardly gets him off the hook. But then, he said he was guilty as sin, only no more so than many people around him. In that regard, I do wonder at some of the vituperation.

Of course, I especially wonder when the vituperation is directed against me. We were doing a book interview, not an investigative report or expose, so the expectation that we check court records about bankruptcies we didn't even know of is -- well, how to put this? -- somewhat extravagant. That said, had I known about the bankruptcies, I certainly would have asked about them. I sure was surprised to read about them in McArdle's columns.

As to identifying Ms. McArdle as "a free-market enthusiast," I meant only to compress, without prejudice, some sense of her economic bent. Regular readers of this page know that "free-market enthusiast" Adam Smith is perhaps my favorite economist.

This makes me suspect many of the commenters below were NOT regular readers of this page, to which they are herewith warmly welcomed. They should also be advised that I was trying to be careful. I had not wanted to shorthand Ms. McArdle simply, as she is often identified, as "libertarian," since she herself has modified the term in writing of her "libertarian-ish perch." As to her writing under the pen name "Jane Galt" for more than a decade, an apparent kindred-spirit allusion to the steely free-market hero of Objectivist Ayn Rand's libertarian scripture, "The Fountainhead Atlas Shrugged" McArdle has written that she assumed the nom de blog to provoke someone (presumably on the left) who referred to those with whom he disagreed as "Randroids." I omitted any mention of her well-known pen name so as not to pigeon-hole her. I did include McArdle's own amusing self description: "the world's tallest female econoblogger." (She's 6'2", it seems.) I thought that would show her self-deprecating sense of humor.

But you see how long all this is taking. And the post was about Ed Andrews, not McArdle. As to his poltical persuasion, I haven't a clue.

Update: On Sunday, liberal Democrat economist Brad DeLong published a long and thoughtful comment on the Andrews/McArdle affair on his blog.

-- Posted May 25, 2009 | Comments ( ) | Permalink

TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Response to Andrews-McArdle.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/1331

Comments

 

 

Archive

April 2012
Sun  Mon  Tue  Wed  Thu  Fri  Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
 

 
» See All Entries

Paul's Video Reports
Paul Solman on Twitter

NewsHour economic coverage is funded by a grant from: The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
The PBS NewsHour is Funded in part by: The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Additional Foundation and Corporate Sponsors
Program
Support
From:
Copyright © 1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.