|
| |
| ||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
« Previous Entry | Main | Next Entry » What's the Relationship Between Inflation and Interest Rates? Name:
Denny Kirwan
Question: I am confused about the cause/effect relationship between inflation and interest rates. Many economic talking heads claim that interest rates will rise if present monetary policy produces inflation. But the principle of supply and demand suggests that if money is plentiful, its cost -- i.e. interest rates -- should decrease. Thus any rise in interest rates would be the result of fiscal policy to fight inflation and not just because of inflation, right? Hope you can straighten me out without using "stagflation." First, waiting -- also known as the time value of money. Imagine an inflation-free environment, such as today's. Which would you take: a thousand dollars today or a thousand dollars, guaranteed, a year from now? Unless you're a very unusual person, it's the thousand right now, so you can do something with the money. If you forgo the money, you generally need to be paid something for doing so, for waiting -- in recent history, around 2 percent a year. Second is the risk of not being paid back. This is why folks with low FICO scores have to pay such high rates of interest. This obviously varies enormously. But the U.S. government has generally been thought to pay the "risk-free" rate: 0 percent for risk. The rest of the interest rate is inflation. If money is losing value and you lend it, you're going to expect to be reimbursed for the loss. Say you and I both expect an inflation rate of 10 percent next year, Denny. I ask to borrow a thousand dollars from you. What rate will you charge me? LESS THAN 10 percent? Great. Let's make that a loan for a billion dollars, shall we? Look, here's the flaw in your logic: If you're paying for your dollars IN dollars, then the less the dollars are worth, the more dollars you'll have to promise in the future to pay back what you borrowed. That IS a higher interest rate. -- Posted June 23, 2009 | Comments (2) | Permalink
TrackBacksListed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: What's the Relationship Between Inflation and Interest Rates?. TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/1417 2 CommentsLeave a comment |
||
![]() |
![]() |
| ABOUT US | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS: |
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | ||
| PBS Online Privacy Policy Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved. | ||
As with many people, you don't elaborate on the word "inflation", particularly its measurement. Your reasoning is good with the appropriate measure of inflation and making lots of important assumptions that you leave out.
The supply and demand argument is extremely important in establishing the connection of money to goods and services. People need to understand this concept and how the fed sets the money supply by buying and selling financial instruments which are multiplied by the banks. This process along with banks wanting high profits sets the interest rates.
You need to explain that this supply and demand for money over time type of inflation is different than CPI (consumer price index), charged interest rates, labor costs, and other common measures of inflation. This explanation is extremely important because many "economists" particularly from Wall Street, the media, and congress are deliberately confusing them. One interpretation of why you chose your particular explanation is that you are deliberately trying to confuse people about the fed's role in inflation and interest rates.
Your three factors determining the inflation rate leave out the most important -- the availability of money to lend. In a free market supply and demand sets the rate and loans, on average, will go to those projects which will be most econmically productive, thus producing the most wealth for the economy as a whole.
For example, if you have $10000 to lend and 10 people want to borrow it, the interest rate will be bid up to however much the highest bidder thinks is justified based on the return he expects to get from his project.
In a regulated market with a central bank and fiat money, the central bank "creates" as much money as it wants, so that it has control of the supply side of the equation. By increasing the money supply, people don't have to compete as much to borrow thus they pay lower interest rates. The lower the rate the larger the proportion of loans which go to projects which the underlying economics don't justify and as a result, on average, money is not allocated to the most productive projects. The result is an economy which in the long run produces less wealth as a whole.