|
||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Not a blog but a "q-and-a" (pronounced "quanda"), this page is about the basics of economics. Its premise: there are no stupid q's. And if some a's seem dim, take heart: I can brighten them up in response to objections, corrections, refinements. Comments on posts feature yours, and my responses. Enough of you now frequent and query the quanda that I post most every day. Haven't seen your q yet? Send it again. All a's should be taken with a shaker of sodium chloride, if not a Lot's-wife's-worth. And speaking of salt, the mustache and "hair" in the photo has a lot less of that condiment, and rather more pepper, than can be seen on TV. Think of it as time travel. |
« Previous Entry | Main | Next Entry » Why Can't We Let Too-Big-to-Fail Companies Fail? Name:
The Populist
Question: Paul, I want to ask you about the "bigness" issue -- "too big to fail." If the big corporations produce most of the economy's products, such as those companies listed in the Dow & S&P 500, percentage-wise, but employ fewer people percentage-wise given the amount they produce, then why should we care if these "too big to fail companies" go down? Since they privatize the profits and socialize the costs/risks and do not employ the bulk of Americans, can we say let them die in peace? Paul Solman: I'm afraid not. Or more to the point, OTHERS are afraid not. The reason they've been saved is that when one wasn't -- Lehman Brothers, thought NOT too big to fail -- the world financial system pretty much froze. No one dares chance that again. The real question, then, is why we haven't done anything about the problem, why we haven't created strong incentives or even regulations to force financial institutions to become smaller, and thus less of a threat to the system as a whole, as George Schultz suggested to me in this recent interview. At the annual economics convention in Atlanta this week, where everyone seemed to agree that something needs to be done, I asked Paul Krugman this question: Paul Solman: So why isn't it happening? Paul Krugman: Well, you know the old line: It's very difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it. And in this case you might say it's very difficult to get a member of Congress to understand something when his campaign contributions depend on his not understanding that. This is as raw an incidence of the power of money in preventing us from doing something that everybody knows we should do that I've ever seen. PS: Will we then, are we then fated to not doing anything? PK: You know the next couple of months will tell. I think if President Obama puts his weight behind it, if there's a real push from the chattering classes on this, which obviously has got to include me, that we can get something. It will probably fall short of what you'd like but there are people who want to leave their mark. I think Barney Frank doesn't want to go down as the Tsar of Finance in the House of Representatives who failed to do anything about the greatest crash since the Great Depression. -- Posted January 6, 2010 | Comments ( ) | Permalink
TrackBacksListed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Why Can't We Let Too-Big-to-Fail Companies Fail?. TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/2448 Comments |
||
![]() |
![]() |
| |||||
|
|||||
| |||||
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | |||||