What Do Fewer Workers Mean for the U.S. Economy? | The Business Desk with Paul Solman | PBS NewsHour

ABOUT US \| LOCAL TV LISTINGS EMAIL PRINT

REGION: North America

TOPIC: Business & Economy

PBS NewsHour

In the fall of 2007, when the U.S. economy first seemed in peril, I began answering reader queries here on the Business Desk. I still do so, but this page has expanded to include posts from eminent economists, "far-flung correspondents," and a variety of voices that have intriguing and/or useful things to say about economics, broadly defined. Please feel encouraged to respond to any and all of them.

« Previous Entry | Main | Next Entry »

What Do Fewer Workers Mean for the U.S. Economy?

Help Wanted Photo by Scott Eells/Bloomberg via Getty Images.

Paul Solman answers questions from the NewsHour audience on business and economic news here on his Making Sen$e page. Here is Wednesday's query:

Name: Taylor Vincent

Question: Surprised by the significant change in the unemployment rate, I looked into the Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers for the first time in a long time. Based on the numbers, the rate is correct. But I bumped into an issue which might be of interest - the change in the Civilian Labor Force Participation Rate from 64.2 percent to 63.7 percent. This means that the ratio of worker to non-worker has fallen significantly. Since we look at the unemployment rate as a proxy for the economic strength and contribution of workers, should we also consider this offsetting factor? What weight should we give it?

Paul Solman: It's never safe to assign much weight to month-to-month fluctuations in the government's labor data. Here's a longer-term picture for Americans 16 and older. The dramatic rise in the rate starting in the '60s is mostly women entering the workforce. And male members of the Baby Boom, too, presumably, as its members reached working age. (I myself, born a year ahead of the Boom, joined the workforce in 1969, near the bottom.)

Civilian labor force participation rate, 16 years and over

BLS Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

A good number to track in the months ahead.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes the change in the rate on the first Friday of every month. Check it out for the latest number, and a historical view that puts it in context.

And check here on Friday for the most inclusive under- and unemployment tally, our monthly U-7 statistic. It still totaled 27 million Americans last month.

This entry is cross-posted on the Rundown- NewsHour's blog of news and insight.

Follow @PaulSolman

-- Posted March 7, 2012 | Comments ( ) | Permalink

TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: What Do Fewer Workers Mean for the U.S. Economy? .

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/13178

Comments

*Photo by Scott Eells/Bloomberg via Getty Images.* *Paul Solman answers questions from the NewsHour audience on business and economic news here on his [**Making Sen$e**](http://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/makingsense/) page. Here is Wednesday's query:* **Name: Taylor Vincent** **Question:** Surprised by the significant change in the unemployment rate, I looked into the Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers for the first time in a long time. Based on the numbers, the rate is correct. But I bumped into an issue which might be of interest - the change in the Civilian Labor Force Participation Rate from 64.2 percent to 63.7 percent. This means that the ratio of worker to non-worker has fallen significantly. Since we look at the unemployment rate as a proxy for the economic strength and contribution of workers, should we also consider this offsetting factor? What weight should we give it? **Paul Solman:** It's never safe to assign much weight to month-to-month fluctuations in the government's labor data. Here's a longer-term picture for Americans 16 and older. The dramatic rise in the rate starting in the '60s is mostly women entering the workforce. And male members of the Baby Boom, too, presumably, as its members reached working age. (I myself, born a year ahead of the Boom, joined the workforce in 1969, near the bottom.) **Civilian labor force participation rate, 16 years and over** BLS Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

BLS Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

A good number to track in the months ahead. The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes the change in the rate on the first Friday of every month. [**Check it out**](http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000) for the latest number, and a historical view that puts it in context. And check here on Friday for the most inclusive under- and unemployment tally, our monthly U-7 statistic. It still totaled **[27 million Americans last month**](http://www.pbs.org/newshour/businessdesk/2012/02/unemployment-dips-to-83-lowest.html). *This entry is cross-posted on the [**Rundown**](http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/)- NewsHour's blog of news and insight.*

Follow @PaulSolman