Q & A: 'How Do Family-Owned Corporations Compete With Joint Stock Companies?' | The Business Desk with Paul Solman | PBS NewsHour

ABOUT US \| LOCAL TV LISTINGS EMAIL PRINT

REGION: North America

TOPIC: Business & Economy

PBS NewsHour

In the fall of 2007, when the U.S. economy first seemed in peril, I began answering reader queries here on the Business Desk. I still do so, but this page has expanded to include posts from eminent economists, "far-flung correspondents," and a variety of voices that have intriguing and/or useful things to say about economics, broadly defined. Please feel encouraged to respond to any and all of them.

« Previous Entry | Main | Next Entry »

Q & A: 'How Do Family-Owned Corporations Compete With Joint Stock Companies?'

Photo by Comstock Images via Getty Images.

Paul Solman frequently answers questions from the NewsHour audience on business and economic news on his Making Sen$e page. Here is Tuesday's query:

Steven Hall: How do family-owned corporations like SC Johnson and Boehringer Ingelheim compete with joint stock companies?

Paul Solman: I don't know enough about either company to give a specific answer, but I can make a few general observations.

First of all, family-owned firms are also almost always "joint stock companies" -- private organizations whose stock is owned by more than one investor. The key factor in "family ownership" is control. If my family owns more than 50 percent of the company's stock, it can clearly dictate almost any major decision.

Family-owned corporations are often said to have real advantages over publicly traded ones. The main one: they can plan and invest long-term, not being subject to the vagaries of the how-much-did-we-earn-yesterday? stock market. Family-owned corporations whose stock is not "publicly traded" on an exchange also have a lot less paperwork to file -- with the SEC, Sarbanes-Oxley, etc. Generally, "privately held" firms have fewer than 500 shareholders.

As any family knows, though, over time, maintaining viable "family ownership" is no simple matter. The greater the number of generations one gets from the original owner(s), the greater the number of decision-makers, the greater the number of different points of view and objectives. Consider how hard it can be to divvy up mom and dad's furniture. Or read The Patriarch: The Rise and Fall of the Bingham Dynasty, by Susan Tifft and Alex Jones to see what happened to the "family-owned" newspaper, the Louisville Courier-Journal.

As usual, look for a second post this afternoon. But please don't blame us if events or technology make that impossible. Meanwhile, let it be known that this entry is cross-posted on the Rundown- NewsHour's blog of news and insight.

Follow @paulsolman

-- Posted October 15, 2012 | Comments ( ) | Permalink

TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Q & A: 'How Do Family-Owned Corporations Compete With Joint Stock Companies?'.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/15178

Comments

*Photo by Comstock Images via Getty Images.* *Paul Solman frequently answers questions from the NewsHour audience on business and economic news on his [**Making Sen$e**](http://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/makingsense/) page. Here is Tuesday's query:* **Steven Hall**: How do family-owned corporations like SC Johnson and Boehringer Ingelheim compete with joint stock companies? **Paul Solman**: I don't know enough about either company to give a specific answer, but I can make a few general observations. First of all, family-owned firms are also almost always "joint stock companies" -- private organizations whose stock is owned by more than one investor. The key factor in "family ownership" is control. If my family owns more than 50 percent of the company's stock, it can clearly dictate almost any major decision. Family-owned corporations are often said to have real advantages over publicly traded ones. The main one: they can plan and invest long-term, not being subject to the vagaries of the how-much-did-we-earn-yesterday? stock market. Family-owned corporations whose stock is not "publicly traded" on an exchange also have a lot less paperwork to file -- with the SEC, Sarbanes-Oxley, etc. Generally, "privately held" firms have fewer than 500 shareholders. As any family knows, though, over time, maintaining viable "family ownership" is no simple matter. The greater the number of generations one gets from the original owner(s), the greater the number of decision-makers, the greater the number of different points of view and objectives. Consider how hard it can be to divvy up mom and dad's furniture. Or read [**The Patriarch: The Rise and Fall of the Bingham Dynasty**](http://www.amazon.com/The-Patriarch-Rise-Bingham-Dynasty/dp/0671797077), by Susan Tifft and Alex Jones to see what happened to the "family-owned" newspaper, the Louisville Courier-Journal. *As usual, look for a second post this afternoon. But please don't blame us if events or technology make that impossible. Meanwhile, let it be known that this entry is cross-posted on the [**Rundown**](http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/)- NewsHour's blog of news and insight.*

Follow @paulsolman