|

JIM LEHRER: Now to some less official views. As we've said, instant polling
done last night by ABC, Newsweek and other news organizations showed people
mostly split down the middle on which candidate did the best last night.
Elizabeth Brackett did her form of polling for us. She watched the debate
with a group of Chicago area voters she first talked to for a pre-debate
report last Friday. Here is his follow-up.
ELIZABETH
BRACKETT: The television set was the focal point of Kathy and Rich Brooks'
suburban Chicago living room last night. The seven voters we asked to
watch the debate gathered around the set, ready for the first faceoff
between the two candidates.
GOV. DUKAKIS: Values begin at the top, in the White House. Those are
the values I want to bring to the Presidency.
ELIZABETH BRACKETT: Illinois, particularly suburban Chicago, is a critical
battleground for the campaigns. In a close race four years ago, Ronald
Reagan won with the help of Reagan Democrats, many of them suburbanites.
Kathy Brooks was raised a Democrat, but she voted for Reagan four years
ago, as did her husband, Rich. Lawyer Tom Allen Stuck with the Democrats.
He and his wife, Jan, lean to Dukakis this time. William McKinney is looking
for a job. He is also looking at Dukakis. His wife, Debbie, thinks their
economic situation might be better with Dukakis. Retired mailman Harry
Keefe usually votes Republican, but says he's undecided. No one in the
group was firmly committed to either candidate as they began to watch
the debate, but previous perceptions of the candidate and his party did
seem to influence the message that was heard. On the question of dealing
with the homeless, Harry heard Dukakis say.
HARRY
KEEFE: It seemed to me that Dukakis was favoring a welfare state in order
to finance all these homes and everything else. Everybody could have a
new home and have two cars in the garage and all this old song and dance
that we've heard for years when you go way back, but paying for it is
another thing.
ELIZABETH BRACKETT: Now did anybody else hear that?
WILLIAM McKINNEY: No. I think Dukakis said the money had to come from
everybody, from Governors, from real estate companies, from the government,
itself, everybody had to pitch in to build affordable housing for people
who couldn't afford 'em normally.
RICHARD BROOKS: I hear more of what Harry was saying in that it sounded
great, but then how do you actually do it?
ELIZABETH BRACKETT: On the deficit --
KATHY
BROOKS: The blame for it goes so many places that I don't know exactly
where it came from.
WILLIAM McKINNEY: Actually he was saying the Republicans made the deficit.
KATHY BROOKS: I understand he said that, but you know --
WILLIAM McKINNEY: How did they make it? No one came --
HARRY KEEFE: The people that have got the purse strings, the Congress,
are Democrats and if they're spending the money, you can't blame the guy
that's on top.
TOM ALLEN: But you know that point Dukakis made he should have hammered
it a little better. I mean, you caught it, I caught it, but it's something
that's beneficial to his campaign and he should have hammered it in greater,
more simplistic terms too.
ELIZABETH BRACKETT: So he hit it so lightly that Rich hear didn't even
hear it.
TOM ALLEN: He didn't want to hear it.
ELIZABETH
BRACKETT: So those who thought Dukakis was a liberal felt Bush scored
points with jabs like this one.
VICE PRESIDENT BUSH: The liberals do not like me talking about liberal.
They don't like it when I say that he says he's a card carrying member.
And I hope that people don't think that I'm questioning his patriotism.
GOV. DUKAKIS: Of course, the Vice President is questioning my patriotism.
I don't think there's any question about that. And I resent it.
TOM ALLEN: Dukakis' response was an orchestrated, preplanned zinger he
was going to get in.
ELIZABETH BRACKETT: Did it work?
TOM ALLEN: But he didn't expect Bush to precede the zinger with the confession
of hey, don't worry, I'm not worried about your patriotism. Did it work?
No. I think it was awkward.
WILLIAM
McKINNEY: They was mainly just pickin' at each other, just pickin', tryin'
-- it seemed like they wanted to make the other guy made enough to expose
something that he shouldn't, let the people see the other side of him.
ELIZABETH BRACKETT: Who won the battle of the one liners would you say?
KATHY BROOKS: I think they both lost. I think there were a lot of cheap
shots thrown back and forth. I think they started off in that tone very
early on and it gave me a very frustrated feeling as to how the debate
was going.
ELIZABETH BRACKETT: Which man appeared more Presidential to you?
TOM ALLEN: What does that mean, since you like to coin those phrases?
ELIZABETH BRACKETT: Which man would you be more comfortable with leading
the country after watching the debate tonight?
KATHY BROOKS: One thing that Dukakis did that really made me feel uncomfortable
was that he appealed to a lot of emotional type issues. I think he brought
up this young girl who wanted to be under a drug program and you know
he brought up various things like that which I just don't think it gives
any credibility to him to tug at the heart strings of America. I don't
think it's an appropriate way to conduct yourself in a debate. And I guess
in that case I lost some respect for him.
DEBBIE
McKINNEY: I was leaning towards Dukakis before I came in and maybe I just
wanted to hear what he was saying but what he was saying were on sensitive
issues and I learned more about how he felt about those sensitive issues
that those issues are important to me, health care and homeless, and he
explained what he wanted to do about them where I didn't hear what Bush
wanted to do about them and so that makes me think well, just continue
what they're doing.
ELIZABETH BRACKETT: Here's the final question. Tell me who you think
won and why.
RICHARD BROOKS: George Bush won the debate. He was, again, he was even
tempered. He seemed more human even though Dukakis was going for the emotional
points, George Bush seemed more human and I risk saying less rehearsed,
but I think he was answering the questions as he felt they should be answered.
Dukakis was answering the questions like he had rehearsed them to be answered.
ELIZABETH BRACKETT: Kathy.
KATHY BROOKS: I have to agree with that. I think Bush won in my book
because it makes me surer that I'm going to vote for him. I felt frustrated
by Dukakis because he did bring up emotional points and I think he hit
Bush really hard in some inappropriate ways.
ELIZABETH
BRACKETT: Jan.
JAN ALLEN: Okay. I guess at this stage I would feel this debate was a
draw. I don't see either candidate shining or pulling ahead. Neither one
of them did that extraordinary of a job that I would say one would have
won and one lost. So they're equal.
ELIZABETH BRACKETT: Tom.
TOM ALLEN: If you measure it in terms of these historically, when you
go into these debates, you don't want to make a mistake, you know, you
just want to play it level, and as trivial and minor as Bush's mistake
was, he did what he was probably trying to avoid, screwing up, and so
if you're going to measure it in those terms, I'd say he lost, and history
has shown that whoever makes the biggest guffaw like Gerald Ford in '76
or whatever year -- and in that sense I think he lost.
WILLIAM
McKINNEY: I was going to say that it was more or less a draw. I don't
think neither of the candidates got really what they needed out of this
debate. I think they drawed more even than they stepped ahead of each
other. Because of the cheap shots and stuff, people are not going to pay
too much attention to the debate.
DEBBIE McKINNEY: I'm not a very good judge on debates. This is the first
one I've really sat down and seriously looked at. I liked what I heard
from Dukakis. I felt that he explained himself better, so if you're going
to measure it on that, I think Dukakis won.
ELIZABETH BRACKETT: Harry.
HARRY KEEFE: As far as the debate is concerned, I don't think either
one of them won. I think it was a tie.
Continue...
|