KWAME HOLMAN: The morning after revealed an upbeat and chipper
Bob Dole.
SEN. BOB DOLE, Republican Presidential Candidate: I haven't had as much
fun since last night.
KWAME HOLMAN: Appearing at a rally in Toms River, New Jersey, as part
of a bus tour, Dole returned to one of his debate themes, that President
Clinton is falsely labeling him an enemy of Medicare, Social Security,
and other government benefits.
SEN. BOB DOLE: Now I know why Clinton only wanted two debates. We
wanted four debates but he can't say anything in two debates. He'll finish
up in two debates. All he can say is Bob Dole is against everything, he's
for everything, and I want to say one word because I know a lot of people
are retired here, don't let Bill Clinton scare you. That's all they have.
They don't have any agenda. They haven't had an idea in four years. They're
trying to frighten senior citizens, veterans, and everybody in America.
(applause)
KWAME HOLMAN: Overnight polls show the debate apparently did not help
Dole close the public opinion gap with President Clinton. Still, Dole
claimed his campaign is on target for election day.
SEN. BOB DOLE: This is a great way to start the post debate efforts.
We've got 30 days to go. Don't believe the pundits; don't believe the
polls. Jack Kemp says don't look
up at the scoreboard; the game's still on. We've got 30 days. We're going
to win the election. We're going to win the election. (applause) We're
going to win the election because I said last night when people think
of Bob Dole, I want them thinking the word "trust," trust. When they think
of the word Bill Clinton, I want them to think of the word "fear," but
trust us. I trust you. You trust me. And we'll put America back together
again, and we'll go into the next century stronger and stronger and stronger
than ever.
KWAME HOLMAN: By contrast, President Clinton's first post-debate appearance
was understated and businesslike. In Stamford, Connecticut, the President
picked up the endorsements of a large group of traditionally Republican
constituents, leaders of major U.S. corporations.
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I have wondered for years why the Democratic Party
should not have at least as much or more support from American business
as the other party.
KWAME HOLMAN: President Clinton said nothing specifically about the debate
but once again touted his economic plan. It was attacked by Dole last
night as harmful to business.
PRESIDENT CLINTON: We never thought that being--or helping ordinary people
live up to
their full potential was inconsistent with trying to build a strong business
environment. In fact, I thought it was a precondition for helping people
to live out their dreams. This is a country with a strong private economy.
And if it doesn't work, then our aspirations for all the people we want
to help can never, never, never be fulfilled by anything the government
does. If there's not an effective partnership that is founded on a successful
private economy, the rest of our endeavors are doomed to be thwarted.
KWAME HOLMAN: And the President responded to Dole's charge the country
is worse off than it was at the beginning of the Clinton administration.
PRESIDENT CLINTON: You see here today how our country works at its best.
This country is better off than it was four years ago not because of anything
any of us did alone, including the President. Our job is to create the
conditions and to try to give people the tools to make the most of their
own lives. And we have done our best to do that. But you can see what
happens when we all work together. And that is my commitment to you--to
do that for four more years, to try to build that bridge to the 21st century.
KWAME HOLMAN: The candidates will have a few more days to hone their
rhetoric before the next debate, scheduled for a week from Wednesday in
San Diego.
ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: Now for some reaction from campaign strategists,
and to Margaret Warner.
MARGARET
WARNER: For insight into how the two campaigns assess last night's debate
and where they go from here, we have White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta
and the Dole campaigns's national chairman, former Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld. First, to Mr. Rumsfeld. Welcome.
DONALD RUMSFELD, Dole Campaign Chairman: Thank you very much...
MARGARET WARNER: Thanks for coming in. What did Sen. Dole achieve last
night?
MR. RUMSFELD: Well, I think he achieved exactly that which he needed
to. If you think
about it, he's had something like 75 to 80 million dollars of negative
ads against him over the last 18 months. He has never had an audience
of the size they did last night, and he was able to go into the living
rooms of the American people and show a very different Bob Dole than they
one they've seen on these negative ads from the Clinton campaign and the
labor unions and, indeed, from his Republican opponents in the primary.
They saw a warm, a humorous, a thoughtful, certainly an extremely knowledgeable
person, and the first task when you're running for President is the American
people have to be comfortable with you as President. At that point they're
willing to look at the issues, and I like the side of the issues that
Bob Dole's on, so I think that now they are comfortable. His ratings went
way up in terms of favorability. He--he certainly was a winner in terms
of humor. He was a winner on the issues. He was a winner in better than
expectations, and I think now the issues will begin to divide the American
people much more than they have previously. And they already knew Bill
Clinton. They didn't know Bob Dole.
MARGARET WARNER: And what do you think the President's strategy was last
night as you watched it?
MR. RUMSFELD: Well I think what he wanted to do was to lay out--he kept
repeating almost the same words--employment, environment, and three other
words that obviously have tested well in his polls or something, because
he must have repeated them three or four times. And I think that's what
he wanted to do. He wanted to frightened people about Bob Dole, and it
didn't work. He's not a frightening person. He's a very reasonable person.
He wanted to lead people to believe, as his ads do, that Bob Dole is
going to do something damaging to Social Security or something, and Bob
Dole's committed. He knows how important the safety net is in this society.
And, and I think that it was a good debate. Don't get me wrong. I thought
it was a good evening, and I must say I think Jim Lehrer did just a wonderfully
professional excellent job.
MARGARET WARNER: Well, Jim has warned us not to have too many compliments
on the air, so let me go on from there.
MR. RUMSFELD: I won't say anything else.
MARGARET
WARNER: Let me ask you about something that puzzled a lot of journalists
and a lot of Republicans I've talked to, that is before the debate, you
and the Dole campaign were saying that Sen. Dole had to fan the doubts
about Bill Clinton's character. Yet, when Jim Lehrer invited him to do
so, Sen. Dole basically sidestepped the question. Why?
MR. RUMSFELD: Well, I think I was saying that before the debate.
MARGARET WARNER: I wasn't saying you personally, but many people--
MR. RUMSFELD: Oh, I see.
MARGARET WARNER: --in the Dole campaign were saying that that was an
important--
MR. RUMSFELD: My feeling is that the American people know Bill Clinton's
character. There isn't a day that goes by that they don't see there's
another subpoena, there's another investigation, there's another cabinet
officer in trouble, there's another White House staff person dismissed
for some problem. They know all that. I don't know what Bob Dole could
do to heighten their knowledge or awareness. I mean, the papers are filled
with it.
The press is filled with it. It's a very sorry situation. And it seems
to me that what he needs to do is to tell the American people--Bob Dole
needs to do is to tell the American people what his hopes and aspirations
are for this country and where he would like to see us go. And that's
what he is doing. When he was invited to talk about Mr. Clinton's character,
I don't know how much more he could have added that they didn't already
know.
MARGARET WARNER: So what has Sen. Dole not yet done? If people now, you
believe, are comfortable with him, what remains to be done after last
night?
MR. RUMSFELD: I think now what he has to do is now that the people are
beginning to pay
attention to this campaign--and indeed they are--he has to position himself
and make them understand his position on the issue. And I would much rather
be going into this last month of the campaign in favor of tax relief to
the American people than I would on Bill Clinton's side, where he promised
the people a tax cut, broke his promise, raised taxes higher than anyone
ever has in the history of the country. I think that Bob Dole's position
with respect to teenage drug use is a serious problem in this country
and Mr. Clinton's record is not a good one there. He has dramatically
reduced funding for the Drug Office.
MARGARET WARNER: Are you--should we be expecting any shifts in emphasis,
for instance, in the message? I noticed you use the phrase tax relief
instead of tax cut, a minor difference, but--
MR. RUMSFELD: Well, I think the big issues that will be talked about
are tax relief for the American people. We're paying a higher level of
taxation than ever in history of 31.3 percent, federal, state, and local.
It will be tax reform, changing the Internal Revenue Service, as we know
it today, into a modern system that fits our society, that's not corrupt,
that's not damaging to so many things, creating a faster rate of growth
in our society, that certainly we can do a much better job. This is the
slowest recovery in the post World War II period. And we need to create
the kind of energy and vitality and creativity and innovation in our society
that will provide more people with jobs and better jobs and more stable
jobs and higher-paying jobs.
MARGARET WARNER: Are you suggesting there will be any de-emphasis off
the tax cut, which--
MR. RUMSFELD: Oh, absolutely not. No. No. I mean the tax--15 percent
across the board tax cut and the reduction in capital gains tax, no. That
will be right there, as will the subjects of drugs, violent
crimes, getting violent criminals off the streets, and education. Now
that--those clusters and I think also there will be probably somewhat
more discussion about foreign policy. It's not an appropriate thing to
be talking about really when there are troops engaged or when there's
a summit taking place, but for the period ahead, it seems to me, it is
proper to talk about the series of so-called false triumphs that seem
to be speckling the globe.
MARGARET WARNER: There were press reports before the debate, uh, saying
that the Dole campaign was going to wait until the debate to essentially
reassess, decide where to spend for the final month money and time and
advertising. Has that process started?
MR. RUMSFELD: No, it hasn't, but it won't--and it won't be a single event.
In other words, what will happen is--and I suppose in both camps--what
you do is you sit down and look at the 50 states. Some you know you can
win and you don't have to put your resources there.
Some you know you're not going to win and you don't have to put your
resources there, and then there are a large number in the middle, and
that's where your best--that's where the candidate goes and the vice presidential
nominee, and that's where the special surrogates go, and that's where
the advertising takes place. And that process will be done probably oh
several times between now and the end. The reason is, is there is enormous
volatility. I've seen numbers change in a state from five to twenty-three
in one four-day period, one seven-day period.
MARGARET
WARNER: Any states you're ready to say--
MR. RUMSFELD: No, no, no, no. We're going to look at it regularly. The
interesting thing about this is if you think about it, John Engler in
Michigan and Christie Todd Whitman and Mr. Jenkins down in Louisiana,
not one of them was ever ahead in the polls, and they all won. Mr. Jenkins
was listed five--he was fifth, and he won the next day. Christie Todd
Whitman was declared a loser, so I think there's a big opportunity here.
MARGARET WARNER: All right. Thanks, Mr. Rumsfeld, we'll leave it there.
MR. RUMSFELD: Thank you.
MARGARET WARNER: And now for a reaction to this, White House Chief of
Staff Leon Panetta.
Hello, Mr. Panetta.
LEON PANETTA, White House Chief of Staff: Nice to be with you, Margaret.
MARGARET WARNER: Nice to be with you. I know you just heard Donald Rumsfeld.
Would you agree with his assessment of what Sen. Dole achieved last night,
which was to make the American people comfortable with him as a person
and a potential President?
MR. PANETTA:
I think he's right in the sense of Bob Dole becoming more human with his
sense of humor. He's got a good sense of humor. He's just never shown
it very much lately, but he certainly showed it last night in the debate.
I think the fact that he was there and was able to counter the President
in terms of the debate and be there on the issues, the American public
got a chance to see him. So I think there's no question that it helped
Bob Dole. But in the end, I think people saw the difference in vision
between where the President wanted to take the country and where Bob Dole
wants to take the country. And I think to that extent, it certainly helped
the President as well.
MARGARET WARNER: Were you gratified or relieved that Sen. Dole didn't
level more of a character attack on the President, or do you disagree
with that assessment?
MR. PANETTA: No. As a matter of fact, I commend Bob Dole not only for
bringing back his sense of humor but also for being restrained about the
personal attacks. The President has always said that this campaign ought
to be about issues, not insults. It ought to be about his record, what
he's done for the country. It ought to be about each candidate's vision
about where they want to take the country for the future. And I think
to that extent it was a good debate last night because it basically did
focus on issues. It focused on the difference of visions between these
two candidates, and I think it was a healthy debate, good for America,
and I too want to commend Jim for the way he led that debate. It was great.
MARGARET WARNER: There's been a lot of commentary that basically all
the President has to do here is run out the clock, so I know you didn't
have a huge agenda for last night, but what do you think the President
achieved in terms of the dynamic of this race?
MR. PANETTA: I think it was important that the President again speak
directly to the American
people during the course of that debate to show what he had in terms of
a very clear vision for the future. He started really in his opening statement
when he talked about his record and what has happened over the last four
years on the deficit, reducing the deficit, the fifteen and I thought
of the ten and a half million new jobs, his ability to reduce unemployment,
to deal with crime, a hundred thousand cops, but more importantly, he
talked about the future and I think the big difference there in terms
of the future was on the education issue.
He talked specifically about scholarships to get our kids to be able
to go to college. He talked about increased investments in education.
Bob Dole talked about getting rid of the Department of Education, uh,
and I think as you went through it, whether it was on crime, whether it
was on the economy, you could sense that at least from our point of view
that American families saw in the President, uh, someone who really does
care about their families and really does care about trying to educate
their kids. And I think that is a very important point. And I think it
certainly was an effective point in terms of the course of that debate.
MARGARET WARNER: Let me ask you about one thing that there were a number
of polls done in the half hour after the debate before people had heard
any pundits or people like you or me, and though the polls did suggest
that basically it confirmed people's votes going into it, nonetheless,
a majority in several of the polls said they did think Sen. Dole was more
honest in the debate and that they thought President Clinton exaggerated
some in the debate. Is that a problem for him?
MR. PANETTA: It's not a problem because the record is there. I mean,
the American people
know the facts. They--you can listen to both candidates talk, and, uh,
obviously they have their own way of speaking to the American people.
But the record is clear, and the President speaks to that record. When
you--when we came into office, we were facing $300 billion deficits. We
have cut the deficit by 60 percent. That's fact. When we talk about jobs,
when we came in the economy was coming out of a recession, jobs, few jobs
had been produced in our economy. We've got 10 ½ million jobs. When you
look at crime in the streets and the ability of the President to put 100,000
cops out there and get that passed, to the assault weapons ban, the Brady
Bill, uh, these are all accomplishments--
MARGARET WARNER: Mm-hmm.
MR. PANETTA: --and I think to that extent the American people know that
this is a president who doesn't just promise things; he delivers on those
promises. And that makes a difference.
MARGARET
WARNER: Looking ahead to the future, one thing we didn't hear the President
mention last night was what plans he had for working with a Democrat Congress
if a Democrat Congress should be elected. Why didn't we hear anything
about that?
MR. PANETTA: Well, obviously, this is about who's to be President of
the United States, and what kind of agenda is that President going to
set for the future. That's--that was the main focus of the debate last
night. Obviously, the President does care about who's elected to the Congress
and whether that individual in the Congress or in the Senate supports
the goals that this President has in terms of the future of this country.
He certainly doesn't want to go through the last two years fighting the
course of a Republican Congress to basically take us backwards to $270
billion in cuts in Medicare and Medicaid, and education and fight against
everything the President wants to do for the future. So it's pretty obvious
that the President wants a Congress that obviously will support his vision
of the future.
MARGARET WARNER: And does he unequivocally believe that would be a Democratically-controlled--Democrat-controlled
Congress?
MR. PANETTA: Well,
I think that is the case because he's out there every place he goes, he's
basically on the stage supporting congressional Democratic congressional
candidates, Democratic Senatorial candidates. So we think there's no question
that they support the same agenda that this President supports for the
future.
MARGARET WARNER: And should be able to--should we expect coming out of
last night that we'll see more sort of wholehearted campaigning in tandem
between the President and the Democratic candidates?
MR. PANETTA: Well, the President's already been doing that. Every trip
I've been on with the President, we have had the candidates there at the
events. Many have spoken. He's done fund-raisers for Senate candidates,
for congressional candidates. He's working very hard to try to assist
them in their campaign efforts but obviously his main
focus is to try to make sure the American people understand what his vision
is for this country in terms of the future.
MARGARET WARNER: Okay. Mr. Panetta, thank you very much.
MR. PANETTA: Thank you, Margaret.

|