ArticleDownload Worksheet January 24th, 2013
Military to Lift Ban on Women in Combat Roles
The United States military announced plans this week to allow women to fight on the front lines and hold combat roles previously reserved for men. The new policy will allow women to command troops on the ground and open more opportunities for promotion and career advancement.
The Joint Chiefs of Staff, senior military leaders who advise the president and Defense Department, recommended the change and informed the Senate of their decision Wednesday, January 23. The armed services plans to open most positions to women by May 15.
“The department’s goal in rescinding the rule is to ensure that the mission is met with the best-qualified and most capable people, regardless of gender,” Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said in a statement.
Most, but not all positions will be open to women
This change reverses the 1994 policy called the Direct Ground Combat Definitions and Assignment Rule which banned women from small combat units and gave branches of the military (Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard) the power to restrict women from certain positions.
Women currently make up approximately 14 percent of the 1.4 million active military personnel and 10 percent of those sent to serve in war zones.
However, due to the changing nature of war, women were already in the line of fire.
“Anyone who has spent any time in Iraq or Afghanistan knows that women are on the tip of the spear. There are no front lines in these counterinsurgency wars,” explained National Journal reporter James Kitfield on the NewsHour. Over 130 women have been killed – many in logistics or supply battalions.
“Wars have a way of sort of making some of these distinctions meaningless, because women are already in combat, quite honestly,” Kitfield continued.
The Pentagon’s decision could open up as many as 230,000 jobs to women with higher levels and salaries than ever before.
But this policy change doesn’t mean unlimited opportunities for women. The branches of the military have until January of 2016 to either implement the policy or ask for special exceptions for positions they think must remain closed off to women.
Positions in special operations forces such as Navy SEALs and Army Rangers, may not become available for women for some time.
Changing attitudes towards women in combat
In February 2012, the Pentagon opened 14,500 combat positions to women, mostly in the Army. But many members of Congress and citizens reacted critically to the decision, saying it wasn’t enough to only open a few positions to women.
“I feel like it’s beyond time,” Staff Sergeant Tiffany Evans, a soldier stationed at Fort Hood, Texas, said in an interview with Reuters.
But others question the impact of the decision. Duncan Hunter, a Republican in the House of Representatives and a Marine combat veteran, doesn’t oppose the plan but said he wonders, “whether this change will actually make our military better at operating in combat and killing the enemy.”
Women serve combat roles in many other countries. Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania and Sweden permit women in “close combat roles,” according to a 2010 survey by the British Ministry of Defense. Australia, Ethiopia, South Korea, Japan and Switzerland also allow women a degree of involvement in combat positions.
However, even in countries that don’t limit women’s participation, very few women actually hold combat roles. For example, Canada’s elite anti-terrorist unit allows women to participate, but no women have been able to meet the physical fitness requirements.
Secretary Panetta said leaders of each branch of the military will have to come up with ways to ensure that this new policy is more than just a change of law and actually results in women having access to top military jobs.
— Compiled by Alyssa Goard for NewsHour Extra
Submit Your Student Voice
Tooltip of RSS content 3
To Vote or Not to Vote – Lesson Plan
Why is voting an important responsibility for citizens? Less than 60 percent of eligible voters voted in the 2012 general election. Yet, for other Americans, voting is a very meaningful, almost sacred duty. In this lesson, students will view three short films that explore the importance of voting. Continue readingcitizenshipCivicscivil rightscivil rights act of 1965constitutionElection 2016GovernmentGovernment & CivicsimmigrationraceSocial StudiesSupreme CourtU.S. governmentVotevotingvoting historyvoting rights
Decoding Media Bias – Lesson Plan
Students will view the We The Voters film “MediOcracy,” and then examine current news stories and how they’re covered by the three main cable news outlets. They will conclude by examining news stories for bias/point of view. Continue readingbiascable networksCivicsElection 2016GovernmentGovernment & Civicsmediamedia biasMedia Literacynewsnews medianews organizationsSocial Studies
Polling Pitfalls – Lesson Plan
What do people need to consider when evaluating public opinion polls? After viewing The Poll Dance, students will examine important aspects of valid polling and evaluate three polls. Continue readingCivicsdemocracyElection 2016GovernmentpollingPollspollsterpublic opinionSocial StudiesU.S. government
Will Americans living in poor rural areas vote?
Some poorer residents of rural America say their voices are not being heard as part of the national political dialogue and the presidential election. Continue readingEconomicseconomyElection 2016low-incomeNorth Carolinapovertyrural AmericaSocial StudiesvoterWilkesboro
Student Reporting Labs STEM Lesson Plan: How well are our wells?
In the PBS NewsHour Student Reporting Lab video, “Water Scarcity for New Mexico Natives,” Las Cruces High School students describe climate changes and human activities which impact quality and availability of groundwater. In the lesson plan, students gather information from a low-cost physical model, choose a part of the groundwater and well problem, propose a solution and defend their proposal. Continue readingEPAgroundwaterScienceSRLSTEMstudent reporting labsUnited State Geological SurveyUSGSwaterwells