ArticleDownload Worksheet April 29th, 2013
Syria’s Use of Chemical Weapons Could Be “Game-Changer”
New allegations that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons against its people has forced President Barack Obama to reconsider whether or not to intervene militarily in the civil war that has already killed over 70,000 Syrians.
“The U.S. intelligence community assesses with some degree of varying confidence that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons on a small scale in Syria, specifically, the chemical agent sarin,” said U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel last week.
On Friday, President Barack Obama told reporters that the U.S. is working with the United Nations and countries in the region to quickly assess the situation. He said the “preliminary” intelligence reports left “varying degrees of confidence about the actual use.”
Determining whether or not the regime has used chemical weapons is important in planning a possible U.S. response. “I’ve been very clear publicly, but also privately, that for the Syrian government to utilize chemical weapons on its people crosses a line that will change my calculus and how the United States approaches these issues,” said the president. “To use potential weapons of mass destruction on civilian populations, that is going to be a game changer.”
Should the U.S. send troops to Syria?
While members of Congress agree that the U.S. must respond if Syria uses chemical weapons, there is no consensus about what action to take.
Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona supports arming the rebels and imposing a no-fly zone, but not sending in U.S. troops.
“The American people are weary. They don’t want boots on the ground. I don’t want boots on the ground,” McCain said during an appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press. “The worst thing the United States could do right now is put boots on the ground on Syria.”
However, his colleague Republican Senator Lindsay Graham of South Carolina says that sending in U.S. troops is necessary to secure chemical weapons supplies.
“If we keep this hands-off approach to Syria, this indecisive action toward Syria, kind of not knowing what we’re going to do next, we’re going to start a war with Iran because Iran’s going to take our inaction in Syria as meaning we’re not serious about their nuclear weapons program,” Graham said on the CBS News program Face the Nation.
The White House has refused to speculate on its response until the intelligence has been confirmed, but a letter to Congress warned that “no option is off the table.”
According to a Reuters/Ipsos poll, only 27 percent of Americans would support intervening in Syria if the government in Damascus uses chemical weapons, while 44 percent would remain opposed.
What is sarin gas?
According to the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA), modern chemical weapons first came into use during World War I. Chlorine, phosgene (a choking agent), mustard gas (which inflicts painful burns on the skin) and other chemicals killed over 100,000 people.
This led to the 1925 Geneva Protocol, which banned the use of chemical weapons in warfare. Later, the 1993 UN Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) outlawed the production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons. However, Syria is one of eight nations who have not signed the treaty.
The chemical that Syria is accused of using is sarin gas. Sarin is a colorless, odorless liquid known as a “nerve agent” that can shut down the body’s nervous system when inhaled in gas form or absorbed through the skin.
In 1988, the Iraqi government used sarin gas and other chemical weapons on the city of Halabja in Northern Iraq, killing an estimated 5,000 people. Sarin was used again in 1995 when a Japanese cult released the gas into the Tokyo subway, killing 13 people and injuring a thousand others.
— Compiled by Allison McCartney for NewsHour Extra
More Extra Articles on Syria
|Syrian Refugees Face Harsh Conditions||Syrian Fighting Spills Over into Bordering States||Civil War in Syria Raises Questions on When to Intervene|
Submit Your Student Voice
Tooltip of RSS content 3
Debating Our Destiny: Do Presidential Debates Matter? – Lesson Plan
The presidential debates have been an important part of the U.S. election process for decades, but how much do they really influence voters? In this lesson, students will watch video clips from PBS NewsHour’s “Debating Our Destiny” with Jim Lehrer, which includes famous debate moments as well as interviews with the candidates themselves. Continue readingCivicsdebatingDonald TrumpElection 2016Hillary ClintonJim LehrerLee Banvillepresidential debatesSocial Studies
Where do the presidential candidates stand on education?
As Election Day approached, the candidates running for president have made and effort to appeal to parents, teachers and students by showing them where they stand on education.CampaignDonald TrumpeducationElection 2016Hillary Clinton
Candidates cite security qualifications after weekend attacks
Following pipe bomb attacks over the weekend, the presidential candidates each took a moment to assure voters of their national security qualifications. Continue readingCampaignElection 2016extremismterrorist attacks
Clinton on bed rest and defensive over ‘deplorables’ remark
Hillary Clinton had to stay home in order to recover from pneumonia this week, but that didn’t stop her campaign.campaign 2016Donald TrumpElection 2016Hillary ClintonPolitics
Native American tribes band together to block oil pipeline
Unrest in North Dakota persists as the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe continues to protest the building of an oil pipeline that would threaten its culture and health. Continue readingArmy Corps of EngineersNative AmericansNorth DakotaoilpipelineSiouxsocial justiceSocial StudiesStanding Rock Sioux Tribe