ArticleDownload Worksheet May 31st, 2013
Obama Administration Moves to Limit Girls’ Access to Emergency Contraception
The Obama administration is fighting a judge’s order that would allow girls of all ages prescription-free access to Plan B, a pill that drastically lowers the chance of pregnancy if taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex.
Emergency contraceptives like Plan B prevent pregnancy by delaying or inhibiting ovulation. Depending on the pharmacy, the pill can cost anywhere from $10 to $70.
The Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) prior ruling allowed girls 17 and older to buy the drug without a doctor’s prescription. Pharmacies are required to keep the drug behind the counter. Girls under the age of 17 seeking to prevent an unwanted pregnancy have to visit a doctor in order to get a prescription for the pill.
Argument is messy intersection of medical research and politics
The battle over age limits began in 2005 when members of women’s groups filed a lawsuit against the FDA’s restriction on emergency contraceptive, saying it was “arbitrary and capricious” and “not the result of reasoned and good faith agency decision-making.”
Judge Edward Korman ruled in favor of the women’s groups in 2009, and ordered the FDA to allow Plan B’s manufacturer to come up with an evidence-based answer to whether to allow over-the-counter access to younger girls, and to consider lifting age restrictions altogether.
However, the case was reopened three years later when Kathleen Sebelius, the head of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, overruled the FDA’s plan to approve sales of Plan B for all women regardless of age.
The judge stood by his ruling, saying the administration’s position requiring women to prove their age would disadvantage young, poor and minority women who are less likely to have an identification card.
The FDA has now approved the sale of emergency contraceptives to women over the age of 15. It will be sold in pharmacies and will be displayed on the shelf, but a chip in the packaging will alert the cashier to check for ID.
Judge Korman, meanwhile, ordered the government to allow all girls to have access to the pills without a prescription.
The Obama administration backs Secretary Sebelius and the U.S. Justice Department who deny the Judge Korman has the right to issue such an order.
Consequences for young women
The policy resulting from this legal battle will have real consequences for young girls, who are reaching puberty at earlier ages and are more likely to have unintended pregnancies.
Supporters of over-the-counter access to emergency contraception say opening up the sale of Plan B would help young women avoid having a baby before they are ready, increasing their control over their own health and lives.
“Unintended pregnancies pose a significant risk to the physical and emotional health of adolescents,” said Thomas K. McInerny, MD, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics. “While pediatricians recommend that teens delay sexual activity until they fully understand its consequences, we strongly encourage the use of contraception—including emergency contraception—to protect the health of our adolescent patients who are sexually active.”
On the other side, many people feel that young girls should have parental and doctor supervision and guidance over decisions related to their sexual activity and health.
“This decision shows an alarming lack of concern for the safety of young girls, the fundamental rights of parents, and concerns of the medical community,” said Anna Higgins of the Family Research Council. “Instead of allowing unfettered access to potentially dangerous drugs to teens, parent-teen communication regarding the medical and moral issues involved with sexual behavior should be encouraged.”
While it seems the FDA tried to compromise by moving the age limit from 17 to 15, the judge in the original case continues to argue that the age limit is arbitrary and political, and only creates problems for younger girls who might face unwanted pregnancies.
— Compiled by Elise Garofalo for NewsHour Extra
Submit Your Student Voice
Tooltip of RSS content 3
Political Parties: Two is Company, Three’s a Crowd – Lesson Plan
How have third parties changed the outcomes of U.S. presidential elections? The Founders did not intend to create a two-party system. In this lesson, students watch the We The Voters film “American Party Animals” to better understand the two-party system, and then break into groups to study three U.S. elections with major third party candidates. Continue readingCivicsDemocratic PartyDemocratsDonald TrumpElection 2016Gary JohnsonGovernment & CivicsGreen PartyHillary Clintonpolitical partiespolitical partyRepublican PartyRepublicansSocial Studiesthird partiesThird-PartyU.S. government
This nine-year-old boy is destined to become a spiritual leader
Jalue Dorje is not your everyday nine-year-old Minnesota boy. While Dorje enjoys soccer, swimming and Pokemon, he is believed to be the reincarnation of an eminent Buddhist spiritual leader who died nine years ago. Continue readingBuddhismBuddhistDalai LamareincarnationReligionSocial StudiesspiritualityTibetworld religions
How does the rest of the world view the U.S. election?
As Election Day draws near, the eyes of much of the world are on the United States and the contentious race between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Continue readingCampaignDonald TrumpElection 2016Hillary ClintonRussiaSyriaworld affairs
Down Ballot Voting – Lesson Plan
Help students understand the importance of local elections and ballot measures with this lesson plan, which includes guidelines for examining a local voter’s guide. Continue readingBallotCivicsdown ballotElection 2016ElectionsGovernmentGovernment & CivicsPresidential ElectionsU.S. government
To Vote or Not to Vote – Lesson Plan
Why is voting an important responsibility for citizens? Less than 60 percent of eligible voters voted in the 2012 general election. Yet, for other Americans, voting is a very meaningful, almost sacred duty. In this lesson, students will view three short films that explore the importance of voting. Continue readingcitizenshipCivicscivil rightscivil rights act of 1965constitutionElection 2016GovernmentGovernment & CivicsimmigrationraceSocial StudiesSupreme CourtU.S. governmentVotevotingvoting historyvoting rights